Decitabine for Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Chinese Patients: An Open-Label, Phase-3b Study

Depei Wu, Xin Du, Jie Jin, Zhijian Xiao, Zhixiang Shen, Zonghong Shao, Xiao Li, Xiaojun Huang, Ting Liu, Li Yu, Jianyong Li, Baoan Chen, Guangsheng He, Zhen Cai, Hongchuang Liang, Jigang Li, Changgeng Ruan, Depei Wu, Xin Du, Jie Jin, Zhijian Xiao, Zhixiang Shen, Zonghong Shao, Xiao Li, Xiaojun Huang, Ting Liu, Li Yu, Jianyong Li, Baoan Chen, Guangsheng He, Zhen Cai, Hongchuang Liang, Jigang Li, Changgeng Ruan

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of decitabine in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Methods: Patients (≥18 years) who had a de novo or secondary MDS diagnosis according to French-American-British classification and an International Prognostic Scoring System score ≥0.5 were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to one of two decitabine regimens: 3-day treatment (3-h intravenous infusion of 15 mg/m(2) given every 8 h for three consecutive days/cycle/6 weeks) or 5-day treatment (1-h intravenous infusion of 20 mg/m(2) once daily on days 1-5/cycle/4 weeks). After a minimum of 30 patients were assigned to 3-day schedule, the remaining were assigned to the 5-day schedule. The primary efficacy endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary outcome measures included hematologic improvement (HI), cytogenetic response rate, the time to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression, and overall survival (OS).

Results: In total, 132 of 135 enrolled patients (3-day treatment, n = 36; 5-day treatment, n = 99) discontinued treatment (major reasons included patient withdrawal/lack of efficacy, n = 48; adverse events, n = 23; and disease progression, n = 22). During the study, 35 of 132 (26.5%) patients from the intent-to-treat (ITT) group achieved significant (P < 0.001) ORR [3-day group (n = 10, 29.4%), P = 0.003; 5-day group (n = 25, 25.5%), P < 0.001]. The HI rate was similar between the 3-day (47.1%) and 5-day groups (48.0%). Cytogenetic response was achieved in 20 of the 30 (66.7%) patients who had a baseline cytogenetic abnormality. Fifty-three (40.2%) AML transformations or deaths occurred and the median AML-free survival time was 23.8 months for all patients from the ITT set; 24-month OS rate was 48.9%. Adverse events of myelosuppression-related disorders (85.6%) and infections (43.2%) were commonly reported.

Conclusion: Decitabine treatment was efficacious in Chinese patients with MDS with its safety profile comparable to the global studies of decitabine conducted to date.

Funding: Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd. China (a company of Johnson & Johnson).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01751867.

Keywords: Chinese population; Decitabine; Hematology; Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); Oncology; Phase 3b.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design and patient disposition. aAfter reaching a minimum of 30 patients in the intent-to-treat analysis set for the 3-day treatment group, all remaining patients were enrolled into the 5-day treatment group. bAll patients were treated for ≥4 cycles; treatment continued for a maximum of 2 years as long as patients continued to benefit. cOther reasons: primarily included patient voluntary withdrawal from the study, and withdraw from the study due to economic reasons or lack of efficacy. Decitabine for injection was supplied as a sterile lyophilized powder (50 mg decitabine), in a single dose vial to be aseptically reconstituted prior use. ITT intent to treat, IV intravenous, PK pharmacokinetics
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time to the first and best response—combining both treatment groups (ITT analysis set). Only patients with remission were included in the analysis. CR complete remission, HI hematologic improvement, ITT intent to treat, mCR marrow complete remission, PR partial remission
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing time to AML transformation or death after combining both treatment groups by IPSS classification (ITT analysis set). Hazard ratio is from nonstratified proportional hazards model. P value is from a nonstratified log-rank test. AML acute myeloid leukemia, CI confidence interval, IPSS International Prognostic Scoring System, ITT intent to treat
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing survival time after combining both treatment groups (intent-to-treat analysis set)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan–Meier curves of the overall survival rate according to IPSS classification (intent-to-treat analysis set). P value is from a nonstratified log-rank test. Hazard ratio is from nonstratified proportional hazards model. CI confidence interval, IPSS International Prognostic Scoring System
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean (standard deviation) decitabine plasma concentration on day 3 of cycle 1 with 3-day dosing regimen (pharmacokinetic analysis set). Decitabine 15 mg/m2 intravenous infusion was administered over 3 h every 8 h for three consecutive days
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mean (standard deviation) decitabine plasma concentration on day 5 of cycle 1 with 5-day dosing regimen (pharmacokinetic analysis set). Decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenous infusion was administered over 1 h, once daily for five consecutive days

References

    1. Liew E, Owen C. Familial myelodysplastic syndromes: a review of the literature. Haematologica. 2011;96:1536–1542. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043422.
    1. Seiter K. Myelodysplasia: new approaches. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013;14:156–169. doi: 10.1007/s11864-013-0224-x.
    1. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, et al. Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2000;96:3671–3674.
    1. Garcia-Manero G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2012;87:692–701. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23264.
    1. [Internet] Survellience Research Program, NCI [updated September 10, 2014]. . Accessed 27 Sept 2014.
    1. [Internet] Copyright © 2014 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre [updated May 2008]. . Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
    1. Chen B, Zhao WL, Jin J, et al. Clinical and cytogenetic features of 508 Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and comparison with those in Western countries. Leukemia. 2005;19:767–775. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403688.
    1. Leone G, Mele L, Pulsoni A, Equitani F, Pagano L. The incidence of secondary leukemias. Haematologica. 1999;84:937–945.
    1. Klepin HD, Rao AV, Pardee TS. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in older adults. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(24):2541–2552. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1564.
    1. List A. Methyltransferase inhibitors: changing the treatment algorithm for myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer Control. 2004;11:16–19.
    1. List AF. Treatment strategies to optimize clinical benefit in the patient with myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer Control. 2008;15(Suppl):29–39.
    1. DACOGEN™ (2010) Prescribing information. .
    1. Issa JP, Garcia-Manero G, Giles FJ, et al. Phase 1 study of low-dose prolonged exposure schedules of the hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in hematopoietic malignancies. Blood. 2004;103:1635–1640. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0687.
    1. Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Cortes J, et al. Results of decitabine (5-aza-2′deoxycytidine) therapy in 130 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cancer. 2003;98:522–528. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11543.
    1. Saunthararajah Y, Hillery CA, Lavelle D, et al. Effects of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine on fetal hemoglobin levels, red cell adhesion, and hematopoietic differentiation in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2003;102:3865–3870. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1738.
    1. Lubbert M, Wijermans P, Kunzmann R, et al. Cytogenetic responses in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome following low-dose treatment with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Br J Haematol. 2001;114:349–357. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02933.x.
    1. Sacchi S, Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, et al. Chronic myelogenous leukemia in nonlymphoid blastic phase: analysis of the results of first salvage therapy with three different treatment approaches for 162 patients. Cancer. 1999;86:2632–2641. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991215)86:12<2632::AID-CNCR7>;2-A.
    1. Willemze R, Suciu S, Archimbaud E, et al. A randomized phase II study on the effects of 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine combined with either amsacrine or idarubicin in patients with relapsed acute leukemia: an EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group phase II study (06893) Leukemia. 1997;11(Suppl 1):S24–S27.
    1. Kantarjian H, Issa JP, Rosenfeld CS, et al. Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study. Cancer. 2006;106:1794–1803. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21792.
    1. Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2670–2677. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9429.
    1. Steensma DP, Baer MR, Slack JL, et al. Multicenter study of decitabine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3842–3848. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6550.
    1. Kantarjian H, Oki Y, Garcia-Manero G, et al. Results of a randomized study of 3 schedules of low-dose decitabine in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:52–57. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021162.
    1. Wijermans P, Lubbert M, Verhoef G, et al. Low-dose 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, a DNA hypomethylating agent, for the treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter phase II study in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:956–962.
    1. Wang XQ, Ryder J, Gross SA, Lin G, Irons RD. Prospective analysis of clinical and cytogenetic features of 435 cases of MDS diagnosed using the WHO (2001) classification: a prognostic scoring system for predicting survival in RCMD. Int J Hematol. 2009;90:361–369. doi: 10.1007/s12185-009-0403-5.
    1. Matsuda A, Germing U, Jinnai I, et al. Difference in clinical features between Japanese and German patients with refractory anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2005;106:2633–2640. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0040.
    1. Muller-Berndorff H, Haas PS, Kunzmann R, Schulte-Monting J, Lubbert M. Comparison of five prognostic scoring systems, the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a single-center analysis. Ann Hematol. 2006;85:502–513. doi: 10.1007/s00277-005-0030-z.
    1. Navarro I, Ruiz MA, Cabello A, et al. Classification and scoring systems in myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 311 patients. Leuk Res. 2006;30:971–977. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.11.015.
    1. Lee JH, Jang JH, Park J, et al. A prospective multicenter observational study of decitabine treatment in Korean patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica. 2011;96:1441–1447. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.046078.
    1. Oki Y, Kondo Y, Yamamoto K, et al. Phase I/II study of decitabine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a multi-center study in Japan. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:1839–1847. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02386.x.
    1. Blum W, Garzon R, Klisovic RB, et al. Clinical response and miR-29b predictive significance in older AML patients treated with a 10-day schedule of decitabine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:7473–7478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002650107.
    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120:2454–2465. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489.
    1. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, et al. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the international working group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006;108:419–425. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149.
    1. Saba HI. Decitabine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3:807–817.
    1. Santini V. Novel therapeutic strategies: hypomethylating agents and beyond. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:65–73.
    1. Qian J, Yao DM, Lin J, et al. U2AF1 mutations in Chinese patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045760.
    1. Lin J, Yao DM, Qian J, et al. Recurrent DNMT3A R882 mutations in Chinese patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026906.
    1. Tefferi A, Vardiman JW. Myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1872–1885. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0902908.
    1. Lee JH, Choi Y, Kim SD, et al. Comparison of 7-day azacitidine and 5-day decitabine for treating myelodysplastic syndrome. Ann Hematol. 2013;92:889–897. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1702-8.
    1. Daskalakis M, Nguyen TT, Nguyen C, et al. Demethylation of a hypermethylated P15/INK4B gene in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome by 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) treatment. Blood. 2002;100:2957–2964. doi: 10.1182/blood.V100.8.2957.
    1. Valent P, Krieger O, Stauder R, et al. Iron overload in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)—diagnosis, management, and response criteria: a proposal of the Austrian MDS platform. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008;38:143–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01915.x.
    1. CTCAE. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events. Version 3.0.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe