Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986

Maria De Santis, Joaquim Bellmunt, Graham Mead, J Martijn Kerst, Michael Leahy, Pablo Maroto, Thierry Gil, Sandrine Marreaud, Gedske Daugaard, Iwona Skoneczna, Sandra Collette, Julie Lorent, Ronald de Wit, Richard Sylvester, Maria De Santis, Joaquim Bellmunt, Graham Mead, J Martijn Kerst, Michael Leahy, Pablo Maroto, Thierry Gil, Sandrine Marreaud, Gedske Daugaard, Iwona Skoneczna, Sandra Collette, Julie Lorent, Ronald de Wit, Richard Sylvester

Abstract

Purpose: This is the first randomized phase II/III trial comparing two carboplatin-based chemotherapy regimens in patients with urothelial cancer who are ineligible ("unfit") for cisplatin chemotherapy.

Patients and methods: The primary objective of the phase III part of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and an impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate < 60 but > 30 mL/min) and/or performance score of 2 who were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) or methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine (M-CAVI). To detect an increase of 50% in median survival with GC compared with M-CAVI (13.5 v 9 months) based on a two-sided log-rank test at error rates α = .05 and β = .20, 225 patients were required. Secondary end points were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of life.

Results: In all, 238 patients were randomly assigned by 29 institutions over a period of 7 years. The median follow-up was 4.5 years. Best ORRs were 41.2% (36.1% confirmed response) for patients receiving GC versus 30.3% (21.0% confirmed response) for patients receiving M-CAVI (P = .08). Median OS was 9.3 months in the GC arm and 8.1 months in the M-CAVI arm (P = .64). There was no difference in PFS (P = .78) between the two arms. Severe acute toxicity (death, grade 4 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 3 or 4 renal toxicity, neutropenic fever, or mucositis) was observed in 9.3% of patients receiving GC and 21.2% of patients receiving M-CAVI.

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in efficacy between the two treatment groups. The incidence of severe acute toxicities was higher for those receiving M-CAVI.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram. GC, gemcitabine/carboplatin; M-CAVI, methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Duration of survival by treatment group. GC, gemcitabine/carboplatin; M-CAVI, methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine; O, observed number of deaths.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
(A) Impact of stratification factors and (B) Bajorin risk groups on survival. GFR, glomerular filtration rate (mL/min); O, observed number of deaths; PS, performance status.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe