Pharmacokinetics of Ampreloxetine, a Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder or Fibromyalgia Pain

Jitendra Kanodia, Arthur Lo, R Michael Baldwin, Richard A Graham, David L Bourdet, Jitendra Kanodia, Arthur Lo, R Michael Baldwin, Richard A Graham, David L Bourdet

Abstract

Background and objective: Ampreloxetine is a novel norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor in development for the treatment of symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. The objectives of this analysis were to define the pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral ampreloxetine and provide dose recommendations for clinical development.

Methods: We fitted a population pharmacokinetic model to ampreloxetine plasma concentrations from single- and multiple-ascending dose trials in healthy subjects and two phase II studies in adult subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder or fibromyalgia at doses of 2-50 mg.

Results: Ampreloxetine pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The terminal half-life was 30-40 h, resulting in sustained drug concentrations for the entire 24-h dosing interval at steady state. Covariates of age, weight, or renal impairment did not impact ampreloxetine exposure. Cytochrome P450 2D6 phenotype had no influence on ampreloxetine exposure. Sex and smoking status were identified as statistically significant covariates, suggesting a role for cytochrome P450 1A2 in the elimination of ampreloxetine. Despite statistical significance, differences in ampreloxetine exposure in male vs female subjects and smokers vs non-smokers were not clinically meaningful at the recommended dose. At the 10-mg dose, > 75% norepinephrine transporter inhibition and < 50% serotonin transporter inhibition are anticipated for adult subjects.

Conclusions: The population pharmacokinetic model effectively described the plasma concentration-time profile of ampreloxetine after single and multiple doses. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis justified using a fixed dosing regimen with no dose adjustments across a broad population and can be used to inform dosing strategies in future clinical studies.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers NCT01693692 (fibromyalgia); NCT01458340 (attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder).

Conflict of interest statement

Jitendra Kanodia, Arthur Lo, R. Michael Baldwin, Richard A. Graham, and David L. Bourdet are current or former employees of Theravance Biopharma US, Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean plasma concentrations of ampreloxetine: a day 1 of single-ascending dose (SAD) study, b day 14 of multiple-ascending dose (MAD) study, and c attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder study grouped by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 phenotype
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of covariates on the model-predicted ampreloxetine exposure following repeated 10-mg once-daily dosing: a sensitivity plot comparing the effect of significant covariates, b grouped by disease state. Base, as represented by the black vertical line, refers to the predicted typical area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) in a female non-smoker from the population pharmacokinetic model. The top horizontal bar with values at each end shows the 5th to 95th percentile AUC0–24 range across the entire population. The middle and lower horizontal bars represent the influence of a single categorical covariate on AUC0–24, with one subject created from each category with other covariates fixed at the typical values for the base subject. The solid black line denotes the median; the top and the bottom of the box denote the first and third quartiles; the whiskers denote 1.5 times the interquartile range. ADHD attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, AUCss AUC at steady state, CI confidence interval, FM fibromyalgia
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Predicted ampreloxetine steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following repeated 10-mg and 5-mg doses: a area under the concentration–time curve (AUC). b Predicted brain norepinephrine transporter (NET) occupancy at an average plasma concentration of ampreloxetine. The solid black line denotes the median; the top and the bottom of the box denote the first and third quartiles; the whiskers denote 1.5 times the interquartile range

References

    1. Smith JA, Bourdet DL, Daniels OT, Ding YS, Gallezot JD, Henry S, et al. Preclinical to clinical translation of CNS transporter occupancy of TD-9855, a novel norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;18(2):pyu027. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu027.
    1. Hegde S, Pulido-Rios M, McNamara A, Smith J, Smith W, Kanodia J, et al. Preclinical cardiovascular sympathoexcitatory effects of TD-9855, a novel norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibitor in development for the treatment of symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) in subjects with primary autonomic failure [abstract] Mov Disord. 2018;33(Suppl. 2):S748.
    1. Kaufmann H, Biaggioni I, Chatamra K, Panneerselvam P, Haumann B, Vickery R. A Phase 2 study of the efficacy, durability, and safety of ampreloxetine (TD-9855), a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, given once-daily to treat neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) in subjects with synucleinopathies. Poster presented at the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society; 22–26 September 2019; Nice.
    1. Metzler M, Duerr S, Granata R, Krismer F, Robertson D, Wenning GK. Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. J Neurol. 2013;260(9):2212–2219. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6736-7.
    1. Florinef (fludrocortisone acetate) [package insert]. Bristol: Monarch Pharmaceuticals, Inc,; 2003.
    1. ProAmatine (midodrine) [package insert]. Lexington: Shire US Inc., 2017.
    1. Northera (droxidopa) [package insert]. Deerfield: Lundbeck NA Ltd., 2017.
    1. Eschlböck S, Wenning G, Fanciulli A. Evidence-based treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and related symptoms. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2017;124(12):1567–1605. doi: 10.1007/s00702-017-1791-y.
    1. Palma JA, Kaufman H. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017;4(3):298–308. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12478.
    1. Kaufmann H, Freeman R, Biaggioni I, Low P, Pedder S, Hewitt LA, et al. Droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Neurology. 2014;83(4):328–335. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000615.
    1. Hauser RA, Isaacson S, Lisk JP, Hewitt LA, Rouse G. Droxidopa for the short-term treatment of symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease (nOH306B) Mov Disord. 2015;30(5):646–654. doi: 10.1002/mds.26086.
    1. Biaggioni I, Freeman R, Mathias CP, Low P, Hewitt LA, Kaufmann H, et al. Randomized withdrawal study of subjects with symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension responsive to droxidopa. Hypertension. 2015;65(1):101–107. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04035.
    1. Shibao C, Raj SR, Gamoa A, Diedrich A, Choi L, Black BK, et al. Norepinephrine transporter blockade with atomoxetine induces hypertension in patients with impaired autonomic function. Hypertension. 2007;50(1):47–53. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089961.
    1. Strattera (atomoxetine hydrochloride) [package insert]. Indianapolis: Eli Lilly and Company; 2017.
    1. Yeola S, Bolleddula J, Brassil P, Worboys P, Bourdet D. Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of [14C]TD-9855 after single oral administration to healthy human subjects. Poster presented at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists; 13–17 November 2016; Denver (CO).
    1. World Medical Association . Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding doctors in clinical research. Ferney-Voltaire: World Medical Association; 1964.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Assessing the effect of food and drugs in INDs and NDAs: clinical pharamacology considerations. Guidance for industry. February 2019. Available from: . Accessed 15 June 2020.
    1. Adler L, Spencer T. The adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS) New York: New York University School of Medicine; 2004.
    1. Crews KR, Gaedigk A, Dunnenberger HM, Leeder JS, Klein TE, Caudle KE, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype and codeine therapy: 2014 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(4):376–382. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.254.
    1. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia: report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(2):160–172. doi: 10.1002/art.1780330203.
    1. Srivastava K, Arora A, Kataria A, Cappelleri JC, Sadosky A, Peterson AM. Impact of reducing dosing frequency on adherence to oral therapies: a literature review and meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adher. 2013;7:419–434.
    1. Faber MS, Jetter A, Fuhr U. Assessment of CYP1A2 activity in clinical practice: why, how, when? Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;97(3):125–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_973160.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe