Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial

David Rodriguez Sanz, Francisco Unda Solano, Daniel López López, Irene Sanz Corbalan, Carlos Romero Morales, Cesar Calvo Lobo, David Rodriguez Sanz, Francisco Unda Solano, Daniel López López, Irene Sanz Corbalan, Carlos Romero Morales, Cesar Calvo Lobo

Abstract

Introduction: Oral ibuprofen (OI) and median nerve neural mobilization (MNNM) are first line treatments for patients who suffer cervicobrachial pain (CP). OI may produce side effects which are not tolerated by all subjects who suffer CP, whereas MNNM has no known side effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of both treatments (OI vs. MNNM) in CP.

Material and methods: This investigation was a blinded parallel randomized clinical trial (NCT02593721). Sixty-two participants diagnosed with CP were recruited and randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 31), which received MNNM or 1200 mg/day OI treatment for 6 weeks. The numeric rating scale for pain intensity was the primary outcome. The cervical rotation range of motion (CROM) and the upper limb function were the secondary outcomes.

Results: The results showed that OI treatment (η2 = 0.612-0.755) was clearly superior to MNNM (η2 = 0.816-0.821) in all assessments (p < 0.05) except for the CROM device results, which were equivalent to those of the MNNM group (p > 0.05). Three subjects were discharged because of OI side effects.

Conclusions: Oral ibuprofen may be superior to MNNM for pain reduction and upper limb function increase of subjects with CP. Nevertheless, both treatments were effective. Median nerve neural mobilization may be considered an effective non-pharmaceutical treatment option in subjects with CP. Regarding OI adverse effects, our findings challenge the role of pharmacologic versus manual therapy as possible treatments that may improve pain intensity and upper limb functionality in subjects with CP.

Keywords: musculoskeletal manipulations; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents; rehabilitation; upper extremity.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram of voluntary participants through different study phases n – number of subjects, MNNM – median nerve neural mobilization, OI – oral ibuprofen.

References

    1. Huisstede BM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW, Verhaar JA. Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature. BMC Musculoskel Disord. 2006;7:7.
    1. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117:325–35.
    1. Daffner SD, Hilibrand AS, Hanscom BS, Brislin BT, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Impact of neck and arm pain on overall health status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2030–5.
    1. Cowell IM, Phillips DR. Effectiveness of manipulative physiotherapy for the treatment of a neurogenic cervicobrachial pain syndrome: a single case study – experimental design. Manip Ther. 2002;7:31–8.
    1. Salt E, Wright C, Kelly S, Dean A. A systematic literature review on the effectiveness of non-invasive therapy for cervicobrachial pain. Manip Ther. 2011;16:53–65.
    1. Eubanks JD. Cervical radiculopathy: nonoperative management of neck pain and radicular symptoms. Am Fam Phys. 2010;81:33–40.
    1. Peolsson A, Söderlund A, Engquist M. Physical function outcome in cervical radiculopathy patients after physiotherapy alone compared with anterior surgery followed by physiotherapy: a prospective randomized study with a 2- year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:300–7.
    1. Caridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J. 2011;7:265–72.
    1. Dillingham TR. Evaluating the patient with suspected radiculopathy. Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;5:41–9.
    1. Boyles R, Toy P, Mellon J, Hayes M, Hammer B. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19:135–42.
    1. Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, Aguilera AJ, Snyder AR. Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2009;89:632–42.
    1. De-la-Llave-Rincón A, Puentedura EJ, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Clinical presentation and manual therapy for upper quadrant musculoskeletal conditions. J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19:201–11.
    1. Asghar W, Jamali F. The effect of COX-2-selective meloxicam on the myocardial, vascular and renal risks: a systematic review. Inflammopharmacology. 2015;23:1–16.
    1. Clark BD, Barr AE, Safadi FF. Median nerve trauma in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorder. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20:681–95.
    1. Bove GM. Epi-perineurial anatomy innervation, and axonal nociceptive mechanisms. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008;12:185–90.
    1. Elvery R. Brachial plexus tension test and the pathoanatomical origin of the arm pain. In: Idezak R, editor. Aspects of Manipulative Therapy. Melbourne: Lincoln Institute of Health Science,; 1979. pp. 105–10.
    1. Elliot MB, Barr AE, Kietrys DM, AL-Shatti T, Amin M, Barbe MF. Peripheral neuritis and increased spinal cord neurochemicals are induced in a model of repetitive motion injury with low forcé and repetition exposure. Brain Res J. 2008;1218:103–13.
    1. Dabbs V, Lauretti WJ. A risk assessment of cervical manipulation vs. NSAIDs for thetreatment of neck pain. J Manip Physiol Therap. 1995;18:530–6.
    1. Van der Velde G, Hogg-Johnson S, Bayoumi AM. Identifying the best treatment among common nonsurgical neck pain treatments: a decision analysis. J Manip Phys Ther. 2009;32:209–18.
    1. Sheather-Reid RB, Cohen M. Efficacy of analgesics in chronic pain: a series of N-of-1 studies. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998;15:244–52.
    1. Nemes D, Amaricai E, Tanase D, Popa D, Catan L, Andrei D. Physical therapy vs. medical treatment of musculoskeletal disorders in dentistry: a randomized prospective study. Ann Agricult Environm Med. 2013;20:301–6.
    1. Borghi B, Aurini L, White PF. Treatment of chronic cervicalbrachial pain with periradicular injection of meloxicam. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Sep 3; [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Cohen ML, Arroyo JF, Champion GD, Browne CD. In search of the pathogenesis of refractory cervicobrachial pain syndrome. A deconstruction of the RSI phenomenon. Med J Aust. 1992;156:432–6.
    1. Day RO. Variability in response to NSAIDs: what progress? Agents Actions Suppl. 1993;44:3–6.
    1. Maguire TA. Ibuprofen: a model medicine for self-care of common conditions. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2013;178:43–6.
    1. Butler D. Mobilisation of the Nervous System. 1st ed. Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 1991.
    1. Butler D. The Sensitive Nervous System. 1st ed. Adelaide, Australia: Noigroup Publication; 2000.
    1. Butler D, Coppieters MW. Neurodynamics in a broader perspective. Man Ther. 2007;12:7–8.
    1. Coppieters MW, Butler DS. Do ‘sliders’ slide and ‘tensioners’ tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application. Manip Ther. 2008;13:213–21.
    1. Elvery RL, Hall TM. Neural tissue evaluation and treatment. Physical Therapy of the Shoulder. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
    1. Allison GT, Nagy BM, Hall TA. Randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for cervico-brachial pain syndrome: a pilot study. Manual Therapy. 2002;7:95–102.
    1. Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, George SZ. Effects of upper extremity neural mobilization on thermal pain sensitivity: a sham-controlled study in asymptomatic participants. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:428–38.
    1. Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Wouters LL, Janssens K. The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment technique in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:369–78.
    1. Kuchari E, Han S, Karłowicz-Bodalska K, Miśkiewicz K, Kutycka E. Safety of oral ibuprofen: analysis of data from the spontaneous reporting system in Poland. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceut. 2014;71:687–90.
    1. Rainsford KD. Ibuprofen: from invention to an OTC therapeutic mainstay. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2013;178:9–20.
    1. Nee RJ, Vicenzino B, Jull GA, Cleland JA, Coppieters MW. Neural tissue management provides immediate clinically relevant benefits without harmful effects for patients with nerve related neck and arm pain: a randomized trial. J Physiother. 2012;58:23–31.
    1. Borenstein D, Wiesel S, Boden S. Low Back and Neck Pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. pp. 771–849.
    1. Sniezek PJ, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen, acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and acetaminophen and codeine for postoperative pain relief after Mohs surgery and cutaneous reconstruction. Dermatol Surg J. 2011;37:1007–13.
    1. Carlesso LC, Gross AR, Santaguida PL, Burnie S, Voth S, Sadi J. Adverse events associated with the use of cervical manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain in adults: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15:434–44.
    1. Portenoy RK, Kanner RM. Nonopioid and adjuvant analgesics. In: RK Portenoy, Kanner RM., editors. Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Philadelphia: FD Davis Company; 1996. p. 219, 247.
    1. Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Gross AR, Walton DM, Santaguida PL. Treatment preferences amongst physical therapists and chiropractors for the management of neck pain: results of an international survey. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014;22:11.
    1. Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman D. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303:2058–64.
    1. Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ. North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2009;11:64–72.
    1. (American Cancer Society . Complementary and Alternative Methods and Cancer. 2015. .
    1. Cassileth BR, Deng GE, Gomez JE, Johnstone PA, Kumar N, Vickers AJ. American College of Chest Physicians. Complementary therapies and integrative oncology in lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition) Chest. 2007;132:340S–54S.
    1. Williams AM, Davies A, Griffiths G. Facilitating comfort for hospitalized patients using non-pharmacological measures: preliminary development of clinical practice guidelines. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009;15:145–55.
    1. Weiner DK, Ernst E. Complementary and alternative approaches to the treatment of persistent musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:244–55.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, the CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:726–32.
    1. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC) Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41:1073–93.
    1. Bahreini M, Jalili M, Moradi-Lakeh MA. Comparison of three self-report pain scales in adults with acute pain. J Emerg Med. 2015;48:10–8.
    1. Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994;56:217–26.
    1. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:174–88.
    1. Dowrick AS, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Does the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scoring system only measure disability due to injuries to the upper limb? J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88:524–7.
    1. Audette I, Dumas JP, Côté JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:318–23.
    1. Fletcher JP, Bandy WD. Intrarater reliability of CROM measurement of cervical spine active range of motion in persons with and without neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38:640–5.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreax L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes inchronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–58.
    1. Cleland JA, Whitman JM, Fritz JM, Palmer JA. Manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:802–11.
    1. Imani F, Motavaf M, Safari S, Alavian SM. The therapeutic use of analgesics in patients with liver cirrhosis: a literature review and evidence based recommendations. Hepat Mon. 2014;14:e23539.
    1. Savva C, Giakas G. The effect of cervical traction combined with neural mobilization on pain and disability in cervical radiculopathy. A case report. Manip Ther. 2013;18:443–6.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) FDA Meeting Topic: NDAC Meeting on Risks of NSAIDs.(April 01, 2015). 2015. Apr 01, .
    1. Unzueta A, Vargas HE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced hepatoxicity. Clin Liver Dis. 2013;17:43–56.
    1. Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion: comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;71:98–104.
    1. McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Dose-response in direct comparisons of different doses of aspirin, ibuprofen and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in analgesic studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:271–8.
    1. Santos FM, Silva JT, Giardini AC. Neural mobilization reverses behavioral and cellular changes that characterize neuropathic pain in rats. Molecul Pain. 2012;8:57.
    1. Kowalczyk B, Feluś J. Arthrogryposis: an update on clinical aspects, etiology, and treatment strategies. Arch Med Sci. 2016;12:10–24.
    1. Kałka D, Karpiński Ł, Gebala J, et al. Sexual health of male cardiac patients – present status and expectations of patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Med Sci. 2017;13:302–10.
    1. Ficklscherer A, Stapf J, Meissner KM, et al. Testing the feasibility and safety of the Nintendo Wii gaming console in orthopedic rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study. Arch Med Sci. 2016;12:1273–8.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe