Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel injection using in-plane ulnar approach: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study

Jin Young Lee, Yongbum Park, Ki Deok Park, Ju Kang Lee, Oh Kyung Lim, Jin Young Lee, Yongbum Park, Ki Deok Park, Ju Kang Lee, Oh Kyung Lim

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the degree of symptom improvement and the change of electrophysiological and ultrasonographic findings after sonographically guided local steroid injection using an in-plane ulnar approach in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Seventy-five cases of 44 patients diagnosed with CTS were included and evaluated at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after injection. All patients received injection with 40 mg of triamcinolone mixed with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine into the carpal tunnel using an in-plane Ultrasound (US)-guided ulnar approach, out-plane US-guided approach, and blind injection. For clinical evaluation, we used the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and electrophysiological tests. The ultrasonographic findings were also evaluated with regard to cross-sectional area and the flattening ratio of the median nerve. Subjective symptoms measured by BCTQ and median nerve conduction parameters showed significant improvement at 4 weeks in the in-plane ulnar approach group compared with the out-plane ulnar approach and blind injection. This improvement was still observed at 12 weeks. The flattening ratio and cross-sectional area of the median nerve showed a more significant decrease with the in-plane ulnar approach than with the out-plane ulnar approach and blind injection (P < 0.05). US-guided local steroid injection using an in-plane ulnar approach in the CTS may be more effective than out-plane or blind injection.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article. We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Transducer position and needle approach for each technique. (A) In-plane ulnar approach US-guided carpal tunnel injection, (B) out-plane US-guided carpal tunnel injection, and (C) blind injection. US = ultrasound.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Transverse sonogram of the right carpal tunnel in a patient with idiopathic CTS. A 27-gauge needle is shown passing from the ulnar aspect of the carpal tunnel to a position adjacent to the median nerve. (A) After positioning the needle tip next to the nerve, the local anesthetic-corticosteroid mixture is injected in order to peel the nerve off the overlying flexor retinaculum via hydrodissection. (B) Anechoic injectate is shown surrounding the deep surface of the median nerve and separating it via hydrodissection from the more deeply positioned hyperechoic flexor tendons and associated synovium. CTS = carpal tunnel syndrome.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Patients’ flow diagram. BCTQ = Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, CTS = carpal tunnel syndrome, EMG = electromyography, I = in-plane, O = in-plane.

References

    1. Katz JN, Simmons BP. Clinical practice. Carpal tunnel syndrome. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1807–1812.
    1. Andreu JL, Ly-Pen D, Millan I, et al. Local injection versus surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome: neurophysiologic outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 125:1479–1484.
    1. Racasan O, Dubert T. The safest location for steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30:412–414.
    1. Swan MC, Oestreich K. Re: median nerve damage following local corticosteroid injection for the symptomatic relief of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur 2009; 34:135–136.
    1. Grassi W, Farina A, Filippucci E, et al. Intralesional therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a sonographic-guided approach. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002; 20:73–76.
    1. Kim DH, Jang JE, Park BK. Anatomical basis of ulnar approach in carpal tunnel injection. Pain Physician 2013; 16:E191–E198.
    1. Smith J, Wisniewski SJ, Finnoff JT, et al. Sonographically guided carpal tunnel injections: the ulnar approach. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27:1485–1490.
    1. Wilson JK, Sevier TL. A review of treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Disability and rehabilitation 2003; 24:113–119.
    1. Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, et al. Bilateral clinical-neurophysiological assessment of median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21:264–265.
    1. Paliwal PR, Therimadasamy AK, Chan YC, et al. Does measuring the median nerve at the carpal tunnel outlet improve ultrasound CTS diagnosis? J Neurol Sci 2014; 339:47–51.
    1. Halil Ucan, Ilker Yagci, Lale Yilmaz, et al. Comparison of splinting, splinting plus local steroid injection and open carpal tunnel release outcomes in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatol Int 2006; 27:45–51.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe