Criteria and procedures for breast conserving surgery

Josip Fajdic, Drazen Djurovic, Nikola Gotovac, Zlatko Hrgovic, Josip Fajdic, Drazen Djurovic, Nikola Gotovac, Zlatko Hrgovic

Abstract

Aim: Emphasizing circumstances that determine increasingly popular surgical approach of breast conserving surgery (BCS), used in lower grade breast tumors, while maintaining survival that is found when more radical procedures are used.

Patients and methods: Several leading oncological protocols in the world are compared, using PubMed database, and our own experience. Data gathered are compared to conclusions of Consensus Conference on Breast Conservation (Milan, 2005). Furthermore, surgical contraindications found in our everyday work are considered, having in mind satisfactory cosmetic outcome, as well as keeping the 1 cm border of "clear" edges. Such more practical problems of edge detection can compromise BCS results.

Results: After observing several relevant protocols, we found very high frequency of mastectomy vs. BCS, despite the fact that stage of disease was low. We also found only 20% of absolute contraindications for BCS. Most frequent contraindication for BCS was multicentricity of the tumor (with micro calcifications), especially in ductal in situ carcinoma.

Conclusion: BCS followed by radiation therapy with tumor-free edges is standard procedure in treatment of T1 and small T2 breast cancers. This approach implies higher risk of local recurrence (LR), although local recurrence is low (1% per year), with rates of survival similar to radical procedures.

Keywords: breast conserving; mastectomy; medical contraindication; surgery.

Figures

Slika 1.
Slika 1.
Mamografija - standardne projekcije: mediolateralna kosa (MLO) i kraniokaudalna (CC
Slika 2.
Slika 2.
Magnetna rezonancija dojki: poslijekontrastni dinamički prikaz u T1 mjerenom vremenu sa supresijom signala masti i prikazom normalne kinetičke krivulje zdravog parenhima

References

    1. Newman A, Lisa and Kuerer M.Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 1685-1697
    1. Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB., et al. Consensus Conference on Breast Conservation. Seminars in Breast Disease. Milano, 2005: 178-185
    1. Singletary SE.Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002; 184: 383-393
    1. Veronesi U.How Important Is the Assessment of Resection Margins in Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer? Editorial. 1994:1660-1661
    1. Fajdic J.Medjunarodni dogovor o kirurgiji raka dojke s ocuvanjem dojke. Da li su medicinske kontraindikacije glavni razlog da se u nekih bolesnica ova metoda ne primjenjuje. XXI Sastanak bolesti dojke, HAZU, Zagreb, 2009
    1. Morrow M.Limiting breast surgery to the proper minimum. The Breast. 2005: 523-526
    1. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, et al. The Relationship between Microscopic Margins of Resection and the Risk of Local Recurence in Patients with Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy. Cancer. 1994; 74(6): 1746-1751
    1. Veronesi U, Farante G, Galimberti V, Greco M, Luini A, Sacchini V, et al. Evaluation of resection margins after breast conservative surgery with monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991; 17: 338-341
    1. Schnall M, Blume J, Bluemke D., et al. MRI detection of multifocal breast carcinoma: report from the International Breast MRI Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22:4s.(abstract 504)
    1. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52: 277-300
    1. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL.Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens: a clinically oriented approach. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992; 98: 125-137
    1. Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance oft he Lumpectomy Surgicac Margin Status in Long Term Results oft he Breast Conservation. Cancer. 1995; 76(2): 259-267
    1. Meric F, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, et al. Positive Surgical Margins and Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Predict Disease-Specific Survival after Breast-Conserving Therapy. Cancer. 2003; 97: 926-933
    1. Osten RT, Winchester DP, Cunningham MP.Breast Cancer. In Steele GD, Jr, Jessup JM, Winchester dp, et al. National Cancer Dana base Annual Review of Patient Care, 1995. Atlanta GA: American Cancer Society, 1995:12-35
    1. Lazovich D, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE.Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991; 266: 3433-3438
    1. Morrow M, White J, Moughan J, Owen J, Pajak T, Sylvester J, et al. Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 2254-2262
    1. Locker G, Sainsbury R, Cuzick J.The ATAC Trialists Group breast surgery int he ATAC trial: Women from the United States are more likely to have mastectomy. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, 2002
    1. Foster RS, Farwell ME, Constanza MC.Breast-conserving for breast cancer: patterns of care in a geographic region and estimation of potential applicabillity. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995; 2: 275-280
    1. Morrow M, Bucci C, Rademaker A.Medical Contraindications Are Not a Major Factor in the Underutilization of Breast Conserving Therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 186: 269-274
    1. Farrow DC, Hunt WC, Samet JM.Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326:1097-1011
    1. Kotwall CA, Covington DI, Rutledge R, et al. Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina. Ann Surg. 1996; 224: 419-429
    1. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Hoffman RG, et al. Minimal increase in use of breast-conserving surgery from 1986 to 1990. Med Care. 1996; 34: 479-489
    1. Samet JM, Hunt WC, Farrow DC.Determinants of receiving breast-conserving surgery. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1983-1986. Cancer. 1994; 73: 2344-51

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe