Prevention of Heart Failure in Hypertension-Disentangling the Role of Evolving Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Blood Pressure Lowering: The ALLHAT Study

Kyle Johnson, Suzanne Oparil, Barry R Davis, Larisa G Tereshchenko, Kyle Johnson, Suzanne Oparil, Barry R Davis, Larisa G Tereshchenko

Abstract

Background Hypertension is a known risk factor for heart failure ( HF ), possibly via the mechanism of cardiac remodeling and left ventricular hypertrophy ( LVH ). We studied the extent to which blood pressure ( BP ) change and evolving LVH contribute to the effect that lisinopril, doxazosin, and amlodipine have on HF compared with chlorthalidone. Methods and Results We conducted causal mediation analysis of ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) data (1994-2002; in-trial follow-up). ALLHAT participants with available serial ECG s and BP measurements were included (n=29 892; mean age 67±4 years; 32% black; 56% men): 11 008 were randomized to chlorthalidone, 5967 to doxazosin, 6593 to amlodipine, and 6324 to lisinopril. Evolving ECG LVH and BP lowering served as mediators. Incident symptomatic HF was the primary outcome. Linear regression (for mediator) and logistic regression (for outcome) models were adjusted for mediator-outcome confounders (demographic and clinical characteristics known to be associated both with both LVH /hypertension and HF ). A large majority of participants (96%) had ECG LVH status unchanged, but 4% developed evolving ECG LVH . On average, BP decreased by 11/7 mm Hg. In adjusted Cox regression analyses, progressing ECG LVH (hazard ratio [ HR ] 1.78 [95% CI 1.43-2.22]), resolving ECG LVH ( HR 1.33 [95% CI 1.03-1.70]), and baseline ECG LVH (1.17 [95% CI 1.04-1.31]) carried risk of incident HF . After full adjustment, evolving ECG LVH mediated 4% of the effect of doxazosin on HF . Systolic BP lowering mediated 12% of the effect of doxazosin, and diastolic BP lowering mediated 10% of the effect of doxazosin, 7% of the effect of amlodipine, and borderline 9% of the effect of lisinopril on HF . Conclusions Evolving ECG LVH and BP change account for 4% to 13% of the mechanism by which antihypertensive medications prevent HF . Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00000542.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000542.

Keywords: ECG; antihypertensive agent; heart failure; hypertension; left ventricular hypertrophy.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of exclusion criteria applied to achieve the final study population for this secondary analysis of ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) data. BP indicates blood pressure; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; ITT, intention to treat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Directed acyclic graph to illustrate possible structural relationships between randomized antihypertensive treatment (Rx) in intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis evolving ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (A) or blood pressure (BP) lowering (B), and incident heart failure (HF). CC denotes common causes (confounding factors), measured and unmeasured. The mediated effect is represented by the pathway from antihypertensive Rx to incident HF that goes through (A) evolving ECG LVH or (B) BP lowering. The direct effect is the pathway from antihypertensive Rx straight to incident HF.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatterplots of (A) in‐trial systolic blood pressure (SBP) change (Y‐axis) against baseline SBP (X‐axis), and (B) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) change (Y‐axis) against baseline DBP (X‐axis). A line of the best linear fit is shown.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Unadjusted Kaplan‐Meier curves for probability of (A) incident symptomatic heart failure (HF) and (B) hospitalized or fatal HF in all treatment groups ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) participants with evolving ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) development (blue dotted line), resolution (green dashed line), or without evolving ECG changes (red solid line).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Unadjusted Kaplan‐Meier curves for probability of incident symptomatic heart failure (HF) in (A) doxazosin, (B) chlorthalidone, (C) amlodipine, and (D) lisinopril treatment groups. Evolving ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) groups as described in Figure 3 legend. CHF indicates congestive heart failure.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Adjusted (by age, sex, and race/ethnicity) risk of symptomatic congestive heart failure (HF) associated with achieved in‐trial greatest (A) systolic blood pressure (SBP) and (B) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) changes in all participants. Restricted cubic spline with 95% CI show change in hazard ratio (Y‐axis) in response to BP change (X‐axis). The 50th percentile of BP change is selected as the reference. BP indicates blood pressure.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Adjusted risk of symptomatic congestive heart failure (HF) associated with achieved in‐trial greatest systolic blood pressure SBP (I) and diastolic blood pressure DBP (II) changes in (A) doxazosin, (B) chlorthalidone, (C) amlodipine, and (D) lisinopril treatment groups. See Figure 5 legend for details. HR indicates hazard ratio.

References

    1. Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, Pujades‐Rodriguez M, Shah AD, Denaxas S, White IR, Caulfield MJ, Deanfield JE, Smeeth L, Williams B, Hingorani A, Hemingway H. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life‐years lost, and age‐specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet. 2014;383:1899–1911.
    1. Zanchetti A. Hypertension: cardiac hypertrophy as a target of antihypertensive therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:66–67.
    1. Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, Koepsell TD, Weiss NS, Heckbert SR, Lemaitre RN, Wagner EH, Furberg CD. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first‐line agents. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA. 1997;277:739–745.
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA, Williamson JD, Wright JT. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APHA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:e127–e248.
    1. Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta‐analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ. 2009;338:b1665.
    1. Davis BR, Cutler JA, Gordon DJ, Furberg CD, Wright JT Jr, Cushman WC, Grimm RH, LaRosa J, Whelton PK, Perry HM, Alderman MH, Ford CE, Oparil S, Francis C, Proschan M, Pressel S, Black HR, Hawkins CM. Rationale and design for the antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Research Group. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:342–360.
    1. Schmieder RE, Martus P, Klingbeil A. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. A meta‐analysis of randomized double‐blind studies. JAMA. 1996;275:1507–1513.
    1. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid‐lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. JAMA. 2000;283:1967–1975.
    1. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. The Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial . Major outcomes in high‐risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the antihypertensive and lipid‐lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288:2981–2997.
    1. Einhorn PT, Davis BR, Massie BM, Cushman WC, Piller LB, Simpson LM, Levy D, Nwachuku CE, Black HR. The Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) heart failure validation study: diagnosis and prognosis. Am Heart J. 2007;153:42–53.
    1. Davis BR, Kostis JB, Simpson LM, Black HR, Cushman WC, Einhorn PT, Farber MA, Ford CE, Levy D, Massie BM, Nawaz S. Heart failure with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Circulation. 2008;118:2259–2267.
    1. Davis BR, Piller LB, Cutler JA, Furberg C, Dunn K, Franklin S, Goff D, Leenen F, Mohiuddin S, Papademetriou V, Proschan M, Ellsworth A, Golden J, Colon P, Crow R. Role of diuretics in the prevention of heart failure: the Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack trial. Circulation. 2006;113:2201–2210.
    1. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang Z‐M. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings: Standards and Procedures for Measurement and Classification. London: Springer; 2010.
    1. Crow RS, Prineas RJ, Hannan PJ, Grandits G, Blackburn H. Prognostic associations of Minnesota Code serial electrocardiographic change classification with coronary heart disease mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:138–144.
    1. Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3:143–155.
    1. Valeri L, Vanderweele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for exposure‐mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013;18:137–150.
    1. Piller LB, Baraniuk S, Simpson LM, Cushman WC, Massie BM, Einhorn PT, Oparil S, Ford CE, Graumlich JF, Dart RA, Parish DC, Retta TM, Cuyjet AB, Jafri SZ, Furberg CD, Saklayen MG, Thadani U, Probstfield JL, Davis BR. Long‐term follow‐up of participants with heart failure in the Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Circulation. 2011;124:1811–1818.
    1. Schocken DD, Benjamin EJ, Fonarow GC, Krumholz HM, Levy D, Mensah GA, Narula J, Shor ES, Young JB, Hong Y. Prevention of heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Epidemiology and Prevention, Clinical Cardiology, Cardiovascular Nursing, and High Blood Pressure Research; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group; and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2008;117:2544–2565.
    1. Roush GC, Buddharaju V, Ernst ME, Holford TR. Chlorthalidone: mechanisms of action and effect on cardiovascular events. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2013;15:514–521.
    1. Cacciapuoti F. Molecular mechanisms of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in systemic hypertension (SH)—possible therapeutic perspectives. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011;5:449–455.
    1. Ernst ME, Davis BR, Soliman EZ, Prineas RJ, Okin PM, Ghosh A, Cushman WC, Einhorn PT, Oparil S, Grimm RH Jr; Group ACR . Electrocardiographic measures of left ventricular hypertrophy in the antihypertensive and lipid‐lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016;10:930–938.
    1. Jain A, Tandri H, Dalal D, Chahal H, Soliman EZ, Prineas RJ, Folsom AR, Lima JA, Bluemke DA. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of electrocardiography for left ventricular hypertrophy defined by magnetic resonance imaging in relationship to ethnicity: the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am Heart J. 2010;159:652–658.
    1. Leigh JA, O'Neal WT, Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of cardiovascular disease independent of left ventricular anatomy in subjects aged >/=65 years. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:1831–1835.
    1. Oseni AO, Qureshi WT, Almahmoud MF, Bertoni AG, Bluemke DA, Hundley WG, Lima JA, Herrington DM, Soliman EZ. Left ventricular hypertrophy by ECG versus cardiac MRI as a predictor for heart failure. Heart. 2017;103:49–54.
    1. Bang CN, Devereux RB, Okin PM. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy or strain is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients independent of blood pressure reduction—a LIFE review. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47:630–635.
    1. Tereshchenko LG, McNitt S, Han L, Berger RD, Zareba W. ECG marker of adverse electrical remodeling post‐myocardial infarction predicts outcomes in MADIT II study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51812.
    1. Biering‐Sorensen T, Kabir M, Waks JW, Thomas J, Post WS, Soliman EZ, Buxton AE, Shah AM, Solomon SD, Tereshchenko LG. Global ECG measures and cardiac structure and function: the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e005961.
    1. Davis BR, Furberg CD, Wright JT Jr, Cutler JA, Whelton P. ALLHAT: setting the record straight. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:39–46.
    1. Proschan M, Ford CE, Cutler JA, Graumlich JF, Pavlik V, Cushman WC, Davis BR, Alderman MH, Gordon D, Furberg CD, Franklin SS, Blumenthal SS, Castaldo RS, Preston RA; LHAT Collaborative Research Group . How much effect of different antihypertensive medications on cardiovascular outcomes is attributable to their effects on blood pressure? Stat Med. 2013;32:884–897.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe