Directly auto-transplanted mesenchymal stem cells induce bone formation in a ceramic bone substitute in an ectopic sheep model

Anja M Boos, Johanna S Loew, Gloria Deschler, Andreas Arkudas, Oliver Bleiziffer, Heinz Gulle, Adrian Dragu, Ulrich Kneser, Raymund E Horch, Justus P Beier, Anja M Boos, Johanna S Loew, Gloria Deschler, Andreas Arkudas, Oliver Bleiziffer, Heinz Gulle, Adrian Dragu, Ulrich Kneser, Raymund E Horch, Justus P Beier

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering approaches increasingly focus on the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). In most animal transplantation models MSC are isolated and expanded before auto cell transplantation which might be critical for clinical application in the future. Hence this study compares the potential of directly auto-transplanted versus in vitro expanded MSC with or without bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) to induce bone formation in a large volume ceramic bone substitute in the sheep model. MSC were isolated from bone marrow aspirates and directly auto-transplanted or expanded in vitro and characterized using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and RT-PCR analysis before subcutaneous implantation in combination with BMP-2 and β-tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (β-TCP/HA) granules. Constructs were explanted after 1 to 12 weeks followed by histological and RT-PCR evaluation. Sheep MSC were CD29(+), CD44(+) and CD166(+) after selection by Ficoll gradient centrifugation, while directly auto-transplanted MSC-populations expressed CD29 and CD166 at lower levels. Both, directly auto-transplanted and expanded MSC, were constantly proliferating and had a decreasing apoptosis over time in vivo. Directly auto-transplanted MSC led to de novo bone formation in a heterotopic sheep model using a β-TCP/HA matrix comparable to the application of 60 μg/ml BMP-2 only or implantation of expanded MSC. Bone matrix proteins were up-regulated in constructs following direct auto-transplantation and in expanded MSC as well as in BMP-2 constructs. Up-regulation was detected using immunohistology methods and RT-PCR. Dense vascularization was demonstrated by CD31 immunohistology staining in all three groups. Ectopic bone could be generated using directly auto-transplanted or expanded MSC with β-TCP/HA granules alone. Hence BMP-2 stimulation might become dispensable in the future, thus providing an attractive, clinically feasible approach to bone tissue engineering.

© 2011 The Authors Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine © 2011 Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine/Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Sheep MSC were characterized using FACS and RT-PCR analysis. (A) With RT-PCR analysis CD29, CD44 and CD166 expression of MSC could be proofed on mRNA level. As indicated by increased CD45 expression, ratio of hematopoietic cells was higher in directly auto-transplanted MSC as compared to expanded MSC. (B–D) FACS analysis revealed sheep MSC to express CD29, CD44 and CD166. Expanded MSC (B) were negative for the hematopoietic markers CD31 and CD45. Directly auto-transplanted cells (C) had a different expression pattern than expanded MSC. The directly auto-transplanted MSC had a weaker CD29 and CD166 but a stronger CD45 expression. Mean fluorescent indices are shown in (D).
Fig 1
Fig 1
Sheep MSC were characterized using FACS and RT-PCR analysis. (A) With RT-PCR analysis CD29, CD44 and CD166 expression of MSC could be proofed on mRNA level. As indicated by increased CD45 expression, ratio of hematopoietic cells was higher in directly auto-transplanted MSC as compared to expanded MSC. (B–D) FACS analysis revealed sheep MSC to express CD29, CD44 and CD166. Expanded MSC (B) were negative for the hematopoietic markers CD31 and CD45. Directly auto-transplanted cells (C) had a different expression pattern than expanded MSC. The directly auto-transplanted MSC had a weaker CD29 and CD166 but a stronger CD45 expression. Mean fluorescent indices are shown in (D).
Fig 2
Fig 2
DiI-labelled MSC at passage 5. MSC DiI labelling was effective and was stable over several passages in cell culture. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue).
Fig 3
Fig 3
MSC in a fibrinogen–thrombin matrix were implanted subcutaneously on the sheep’s back (groups 1–3). Explants were harvested after 2 weeks (shown in A and B) and 4 weeks (shown in C and D) to investigate apoptosis and sufficient DiI labelling of the implanted MSC. Constructs with expanded MSC are shown in (A) and (C) versus constructs with directly auto-transplanted MSC shown in (B) and (D). DiI+ cells (red) were identified at all time-points in the subcutaneous implants. The staining intensity of expanded MSC was stronger in comparison to directly auto-transplanted MSC. Apoptotic cells (TUNEL assay) are shown in green. Both expanded and directly auto-transplanted cells had a decreasing apoptosis during the implantation period.
Fig 4
Fig 4
MSC in a fibrinogen–thrombin matrix were implanted subcutaneously on the sheep’s back (groups 1–3). Explants were harvested after 2 weeks (shown in A and B) and 4 weeks (shown in C and D) to investigate proliferation of the implanted MSC. Constructs with expanded MSC are shown in (A) and (C) versus constructs with directly auto-transplanted MSC shown in (B) and (D). DiI-labelled MSC are shown in red. Proliferating cells (Ki67) are shown in green. Both expanded and directly auto-transplanted cells had a constant proliferation during the implantation period.
Fig 5
Fig 5
β-TCP/HA granules were implanted subcutaneously in sheep with different BMP-2 concentrations (groups 5–7). Haematoxylin and eosin (A–C) and collagen I (D–F) staining were performed. A/D 2.5 μg/ml BMP-2, B/E 12.5 μg/ml BMP-2, C/F 60 μg/ml BMP-2. Only initial signs of bone formation could be observed while using 2.5 or 12.5 μg/ml BMP-2 nearby the β-TCP/HA granules. Trabecular, osteon-like bone formation could be detected in combination using 60 μg/ml BMP-2.
Fig 6
Fig 6
β-TCP/HA granules were implanted subcutaneously in sheep with different BMP-2 concentrations (groups 4–7) (A and B). The expression of genes specific for bone can be detected in the 60 μg/ml constructs. Expression levels in bone serve as controls. (C) Osteocalcin, osteonectin, osteopontin and collagen I are up-regulated in 60 μg/ml constructs compared to the control group using β-TCP/HA granules with fibrinogen–thrombin matrix without growth factors or cells.
Fig 7
Fig 7
For determination of the cell type which is qualified best for bone tissue engineering purposes, different groups (expanded versus directly auto-transplanted MSC, groups 8–10) were investigated. In both groups cells were DiI labelled prior to implantation and implanted subcutaneously with or without BMP-2. Bone formation is shown in haematoxylin and eosin (A–C) and collagen I staining (D–F). Directly auto-transplanted (B, E) or expanded MCS (A, D) and BMP-2 in combination with directly auto-transplanted MSC (C, F) contribute to bone formation in subcutaneous sheep implants. Bone formation was observed in all groups. (G) There is no difference between the groups with expanded or directly auto-transplanted MSC. Even the combination with BMP-2 in this setting did not improve the bone mass.
Fig 8
Fig 8
For determination of the cell type which is qualified best for bone tissue engineering purposes, different groups (expanded versus directly auto-transplanted MSC, groups 8–10) were investigated. In both groups cells were implanted subcutaneously with or without BMP-2. (A–C) The expression of bone-specific genes is proofed by RT-PCR analysis. (D) Osteocalcin and osteopontin are up-regulated in all three groups in comparison to the control group using β-TCP/HA granules with fibrinogen–thrombin matrix without growth factors or cells.
Fig 9
Fig 9
For determination of the cell type which is qualified best for bone tissue engineering purposes, different groups (expanded versus directly auto-transplanted MSC, groups 8–10) were investigated. In both groups cells were DiI labelled prior to implantation and implanted subcutaneously with or without BMP-2. (A–C) Expanded MSC (A), directly auto-transplanted MSC (B), BMP-2 in combination with directly auto-transplanted MSC (C). DiI-labelled MSC (red) could be found close to β-TCP/HA granules contributing to the newly formed bone parts. In the explants with directly auto-transplanted MSC a higher section of the DiI-labelled cells were found in the connective tissue parts of the constructs compared to the explants with expanded MSC or directly auto-transplanted MSC with BMP-2. (D–F) Sections of constructs of the groups with expanded MSC (D), directly auto-transplanted MSC (E), BMP-2 in combination with directly auto-transplanted MSC (F) were evaluated for vascularization. The constructs in all three groups are well vascularized as shown by CD31 immunohistochemistry (green). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue).

References

    1. Kneser U, Schaefer DJ, Polykandriotis E, et al. Tissue engineering of bone: the reconstructive surgeon’s point of view. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10:7–19.
    1. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:10–27.
    1. Vaccaro AR. The role of the osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft. Orthopedics. 2002;25:s571–8.
    1. Deschaseaux F, Pontikoglou C, Sensebe L. Bone regeneration: the stem/progenitor cells point of view. J Cell Mol Med. 2009 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00878.x.
    1. Niedhart C, Maus U, Redmann E, et al. Stimulation of bone formation with an in situ setting tricalcium phosphate/rhBMP-2 composite in rats. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;65:17–23.
    1. Eyckmans J, Roberts SJ, Schrooten J, et al. A clinically relevant model of osteoinduction: a process requiring calcium phosphate and BMP/Wnt signaling. J Cell Mol Med. 2009 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00807.x.
    1. Sampath TK, Coughlin JE, Whetstone RM, et al. Bovine osteogenic protein is composed of dimers of OP-1 and BMP-2A, two members of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:13198–205.
    1. Sampath TK, Maliakal JC, Hauschka PV, et al. Recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (hOP-1) induces new bone formation in vivo with a specific activity comparable with natural bovine osteogenic protein and stimulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:20352–62.
    1. Burkus JK, Sandhu HS, Gornet MF, et al. Use of rhBMP-2 in combination with structural cortical allografts: clinical and radiographic outcomes in anterior lumbar spinal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1205–12.
    1. Yang XB, Whitaker MJ, Sebald W, et al. Human osteoprogenitor bone formation using encapsulated bone morphogenetic protein 2 in porous polymer scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:1037–45.
    1. Lee K, Chan CK, Patil N, et al. Cell therapy for bone regeneration–bench to bedside. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;89:252–63.
    1. Satija NK, Singh VK, Verma YK, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy: a new paradigm in regenerative medicine. J Cell Mol Med. 2009 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00857.x.
    1. Liu H, Toh WS, Lu K, et al. A subpopulation of mesenchymal stromal cells with high osteogenic potential. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:2436–47.
    1. Niemeyer P, Fechner K, Milz S, et al. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue for bone regeneration in a critical size defect of the sheep tibia and the influence of platelet-rich plasma. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3572–9.
    1. Mrugala D, Bony C, Neves N, et al. Phenotypic and functional characterisation of ovine mesenchymal stem cells: application to a cartilage defect model. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:288–95.
    1. McCarty RC, Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, et al. Characterisation and developmental potential of ovine bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2009;219:324–33.
    1. Weir C, Morel-Kopp MC, Gill A, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells: isolation, characterisation and in vivo fluorescent dye tracking. Heart Lung Circ. 2008;17:395–403.
    1. Kon E, Muraglia A, Corsi A, et al. Autologous bone marrow stromal cells loaded onto porous hydroxyapatite ceramic accelerate bone repair in critical-size defects of sheep long bones. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;49:328–37.
    1. Sales VL, Mettler BA, Lopez-Ilasaca M, et al. Endothelial progenitor and mesenchymal stem cell-derived cells persist in tissue-engineered patch in vivo: application of green and red fluorescent protein-expressing retroviral vector. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:525–35.
    1. Vincentelli A, Wautot F, Juthier F, et al. In vivo autologous recellularization of a tissue-engineered heart valve: are bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells the best candidates? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:424–32.
    1. Ishikawa H, Kitoh H, Sugiura F, et al. The effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the osteogenic potential of rat mesenchymal stem cells after several passages. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:285–92.
    1. Kalia P, Blunn GW, Miller J, et al. Do autologous mesenchymal stem cells augment bone growth and contact to massive bone tumor implants? Tissue Eng. 2006;12:1617–26.
    1. Giannoni P, Mastrogiacomo M, Alini M, et al. Regeneration of large bone defects in sheep using bone marrow stromal cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2008;2:253–62.
    1. Geiger F, Bertram H, Berger I, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene-activated matrix (VEGF165-GAM) enhances osteogenesis and angiogenesis in large segmental bone defects. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:2028–35.
    1. Steffens L, Wenger A, Stark GB, et al. In vivo engineering of a human vasculature for bone tissue engineering applications. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:3380–6.
    1. Beckermann BM, Kallifatidis G, Groth A, et al. VEGF expression by mesenchymal stem cells contributes to angiogenesis in pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:622–31.
    1. Pirraco RP, Marques AP, Reis RL. Cell interactions in bone tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;14:93–102.
    1. Arkudas A, Tjiawi J, Bleiziffer O, et al. Fibrin gel-immobilized VEGF and bFGF efficiently stimulate angiogenesis in the AV loop model. Mol Med. 2007;13:480–7.
    1. Maus U, Andereya S, Gravius S, et al. BMP-2 incorporated in a tricalcium phosphate bone substitute enhances bone remodeling in sheep. J Biomater Appl. 2008;22:559–76.
    1. Maegawa N, Kawamura K, Hirose M, et al. Enhancement of osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells cultured by selective combination of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007;1:306–13.
    1. Selvamurugan N, Kwok S, Vasilov A, et al. Effects of BMP-2 and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on rat primary osteoblastic cell proliferation and gene expression. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:1213–20.
    1. Vitale-Brovarone C, Verne E, Robiglio L, et al. Development of glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: characterisation, proliferation of human osteoblasts and nodule formation. Acta Biomater. 2007;3:199–208.
    1. Beier JP, Horch RE, Arkudas A, et al. De novo generation of axially vascularized tissue in a large animal model. Microsurgery. 2009;29:42–51.
    1. Beier JP, Horch RE, Hess A, et al. Axial vascularization of a large volume calcium phosphate ceramic bone substitute in the sheep AV loop model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2009 10.1002/term.229.
    1. Arkudas A, Beier JP, Heidner K, et al. Axial prevascularization of porous matrices using an arteriovenous loop promotes survival and differentiation of transplanted autologous osteoblasts. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:1549–60.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe