Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events

Airazat M Kazaryan, Bård I Røsok, Bjørn Edwin, Airazat M Kazaryan, Bård I Røsok, Bjørn Edwin

Abstract

Background. Morbidity is a cornerstone assessing surgical treatment; nevertheless surgeons have not reached extensive consensus on this problem. Methods and Findings. Clavien, Dindo, and Strasberg with coauthors (1992, 2004, 2009, and 2010) made significant efforts to the standardization of surgical morbidity (Clavien-Dindo-Strasberg classification, last revision, the Accordion classification). However, this classification includes only postoperative complications and has two principal shortcomings: disregard of intraoperative events and confusing terminology. Postoperative events have a major impact on patient well-being. However, intraoperative events should also be recorded and reported even if they do not evidently affect the patient's postoperative well-being. The term surgical complication applied in the Clavien-Dindo-Strasberg classification may be regarded as an incident resulting in a complication caused by technical failure of surgery, in contrast to the so-called medical complications. Therefore, the term surgical complication contributes to misinterpretation of perioperative morbidity. The term perioperative adverse events comprising both intraoperative unfavourable incidents and postoperative complications could be regarded as better alternative. In 2005, Satava suggested a simple grading to evaluate intraoperative surgical errors. Based on that approach, we have elaborated a 3-grade classification of intraoperative incidents so that it can be used to grade intraoperative events of any type of surgery. Refinements have been made to the Accordion classification of postoperative complications. Interpretation. The proposed systematization of perioperative adverse events utilizing the combined application of two appraisal tools, that is, the elaborated classification of intraoperative incidents on the basis of the Satava approach to surgical error evaluation together with the modified Accordion classification of postoperative complication, appears to be an effective tool for comprehensive assessment of surgical outcomes. This concept was validated in regard to various surgical procedures. Broad implementation of this approach will promote the development of surgical science and practice.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic reproduction of the constituents of perioperative adverse events.

References

    1. Veen MR, Lardenoye JWHP, Kastelein GW, Breslau PJ. Recording and classification of complications in a surgical practice. European Journal of Surgery. 1999;165(5):421–425.
    1. Maddern GJ. Evidence-based medicine in practice: surgery. Medical Journal of Australia. 2001;174(10):528–529.
    1. Jaques DP. Measuring morbidity. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240(2):214–215.
    1. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. The Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1097–1104.
    1. Dindo D, Clavien PA. What is a surgical complication? World Journal of Surgery. 2008;32(6):939–941.
    1. Sokol DK, Wilson J. What is a surgical complication? World Journal of Surgery. 2008;32(6):942–944.
    1. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518–526.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240(2):205–213.
    1. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(2):177–186.
    1. Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, Strasberg SM. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2010;210(3):286–298.
    1. Cunningham SC, Klein RV, Kavic SM. A nomenclature of nomenclature: the sources of terminologic uncertainty and confusion and the value of communication. Archives of Surgery. 2009;144(2):104–106.
    1. Cunningham SC, Kavic SM. What is a surgical complication? World Journal of Surgery. 2009;33(5):1099–1100.
    1. Wilson J, Sokol DK. Do we need a concept of intraoperative complication? World Journal of Surgery. 2009;33(5):p. 1102.
    1. Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuiman MW, Fletcher DR, Ridout SC. Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery. 2006;93(7):844–853.
    1. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. British Medical Journal. 2000;320(7237):759–763.
    1. Yang GZ, Kelley E, Darzi A. Patients’ safety for global health. The Lancet. 2011;377(9769):886–887.
    1. Galleano R, Franceschi A, Ciciliot M, Falchero F, Cuschieri A. Errors in laparoscopic surgery: what surgeons should know. Minerva Chirurgica. 2011;66(2):107–117.
    1. Ancona E, Cagol M, Epifani M, et al. Surgical complications do not affect longterm survival after esophagectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus and cardia. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2006;203(5):661–669.
    1. Iversen LH, Bülow S, Christensen IJ, Laurberg S, Harling H. Postoperative medical complications are the main cause of early death after emergency surgery for colonic cancer. British Journal of Surgery. 2008;95(8):1012–1019.
    1. Coon D, Gusenoff JA, Kannan N, El Khoudary SR, Naghshineh N, Rubin JP. Body mass and surgical complications in the postbariatric reconstructive patient: analysis of 511 cases. Annals of Surgery. 2009;249(3):397–401.
    1. Cohen MM, Cameron CB, Duncan PG. Pediatric anesthesia morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1990;70(2):160–167.
    1. Jin F, Chung F. Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2001;87(4):608–624.
    1. Katz JN, Barrett J, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Wright RJ, Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A. 2004;86(9):1909–1916.
    1. Harthun NL, Baglioni AJ, Kongable GL, et al. Carotid endarterectomy: update on the gold standard treatment for carotid stenosis. The American Surgeon. 2005;71(8):647–651.
    1. O’Brien PE, Sawyer SM, Laurie C, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in severely obese adolescents: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;303(6):519–526.
    1. Barajas-Nava L, Solà I, Delgado-Noguera M, et al. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines in perioperative care: a systematic appraisal. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010;19(6, article e50)
    1. Satava RM. Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies. 2005;14(4-5):257–261.
    1. Takaaki I, Kinoshita H, Satou M, et al. Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a single institute experience of 1017 procedures. Journal of endourology. 2010;24(2):253–260.
    1. Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World Journal of Urology. 2008;26(6):539–547.
    1. Kazaryan AM, Marangos IP, Røsok BI, et al. Laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases: surgical and long-term oncologic outcome. Annals of Surgery. 2010;252(6):1005–1012.
    1. Habuchi T, Terachi T, Mimata H, et al. Evaluation of 2, 590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan. Surgical Endoscopy. 2012;26(6):1656–1663.
    1. sensi-Perez J, Villalba-Ferrer F, Roig-Vila JV. Medical and surgical language. Cirugía Española. 2008;84(1):10–15.
    1. De Boer MT, Molenaar IQ, Porte RJ. Impact of blood loss on outcome after liver resection. Digestive Surgery. 2007;24(4):259–264.
    1. Kazanjian KK, Hines OJ, Duffy JP, Yoon DY, Cortina G, Reber HA. Improved survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy to treat adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: the influence of operative blood loss. Archives of Surgery. 2008;143(12):1166–1171.
    1. Kelles SMB, Barreto SM, Guerra HL. Mortality and hospital stay after bariatric surgery in 2,167 patients: influence of the surgeon expertise. Obesity Surgery. 2009;19(9):1228–1235.
    1. Christensen HK, Thaysen HV, Rodt SÅ, Carlsson P, Laurberg S. Short hospital stay and low complication rate are possible with a fully implemented fast-track model after elective colonic surgery. European Surgical Research. 2011;46(3):156–161.
    1. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;361(14):1368–1375.
    1. Martin RCG, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Annals of Surgery. 2002;235(6):803–813.
    1. Wu WC, Smith TS, Henderson WG, et al. Operative blood loss, blood transfusion, and 30-day mortality in older patients after major noncardiac surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2010;252(1):11–17.
    1. Davenport DL, Xenos ES, Hosokawa P, Radford J, Henderson WG, Endean ED. The influence of body mass index obesity status on vascular surgery 30-day morbidity and mortality. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2009;49(1):140.e1–147.e1.
    1. Kaafarani HMA, Hur K, Campasano M, Reda DJ, Itani KMF. Classification and valuation of postoperative complications in a randomized trial of open versus laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy. Hernia. 2010;14(3):231–235.
    1. Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E, et al. Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: the french greccar III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Annals of Surgery. 2010;252(5):863–867.
    1. Choy I, Okrainec A. Simulation in surgery: perfecting the practice. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2010;90(3):457–473.
    1. Bishop LJ, Nolen AL. Animals in research and education: ethical issues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2001;11(1):91–112.
    1. Mamais C, Hawthorne M, Dias A, Charaklias N, Nirmal Kumar B. Introduction of a new surgical technique: medico-legal aspects. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2010;35(6):515–518.
    1. DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2006;244(6):931–937.
    1. Nerli RB, Reddy M, Prabha V, Koura A, Patne P, Ganesh MK. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Pediatric Surgery International. 2009;25(4):343–347.
    1. Kazaryan AM, Rosok BI, Marangos IP, Rosseland AR, Edwin B. Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surgical Endoscopy. 2011;25(12):3881–3889.
    1. Kazaryan AM, Marangos IP, Rosok BI, Rosseland AR, Edwin B. Impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic adrenal surgery. Surgical Innovation. 2011;18(4):358–367.
    1. Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N, et al. Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. Journal of Urology. 2011;186(3):1035–1040.
    1. Marangos IP, Buanes T, Rosok BI, et al. Laparoscopic resection of exocrine carcinoma in central and distal pancreas results in a high rate of radical resections and long postoperative survival. Surgery. 2012;151(5):717–723.
    1. Agadzhanov VG, Shulutko AM, Kazaryan AM. Minilaparotomy surgery in treatment of choledocholithiasis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2013;150(2):129–135.
    1. Fosså A, Røsok BI, Kazaryan AM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery in stage I-III adrenocortical carcinoma: a retrospective comparison of 32 patients. Acta Oncologica. 2013

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe