Cartilage regeneration by chondrogenic induced adult stem cells in osteoarthritic sheep model

Chinedu C Ude, Shamsul B Sulaiman, Ng Min-Hwei, Chen Hui-Cheng, Johan Ahmad, Norhamdan M Yahaya, Aminuddin B Saim, Ruszymah B H Idrus, Chinedu C Ude, Shamsul B Sulaiman, Ng Min-Hwei, Chen Hui-Cheng, Johan Ahmad, Norhamdan M Yahaya, Aminuddin B Saim, Ruszymah B H Idrus

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, Adipose stem cells (ADSC) and bone marrow stem cells (BMSC), multipotent adult cells with the potentials for cartilage regenerations were induced to chondrogenic lineage and used for cartilage regenerations in surgically induced osteoarthritis in sheep model.

Methods: Osteoarthritis was induced at the right knee of sheep by complete resection of the anterior cruciate ligament and medial meniscus following a 3-weeks exercise regimen. Stem cells from experimental sheep were culture expanded and induced to chondrogenic lineage. Test sheep received a single dose of 2 × 10(7) autologous PKH26-labelled, chondrogenically induced ADSCs or BMSCs as 5 mls injection, while controls received 5 mls culture medium.

Results: The proliferation rate of ADSCs 34.4 ± 1.6 hr was significantly higher than that of the BMSCs 48.8 ± 5.3 hr (P = 0.008). Chondrogenic induced BMSCs had significantly higher expressions of chondrogenic specific genes (Collagen II, SOX9 and Aggrecan) compared to chondrogenic ADSCs (P = 0.031, 0.010 and 0.013). Grossly, the treated knee joints showed regenerated de novo cartilages within 6 weeks post-treatment. On the International Cartilage Repair Society grade scores, chondrogenically induced ADSCs and BMSCs groups had significantly lower scores than controls (P = 0.0001 and 0.0001). Fluorescence of the tracking dye (PKH26) in the injected cells showed that they had populated the damaged area of cartilage. Histological staining revealed loosely packed matrixes of de novo cartilages and immunostaining demonstrated the presence of cartilage specific proteins, Collagen II and SOX9.

Conclusion: Autologous chondrogenically induced ADSCs and BMSCs could be promising cell sources for cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. The arthroscopic and arthrotomy representation…
Figure 1. The arthroscopic and arthrotomy representation of the right knee joints before and after surgical inductions.
(a) The arthroscopic representation of the right knee joints before the surgical operations revealed no chondral lesion on medial femoral condyle (MFC) and medial tibial plateau (MTP). (b) The arthrotomy photo during the surgical operations revealed no previous lesions at Patella femoral groove (PFG), medial femoral condyle (MFC), medial tibial plateau (MTP). (c) The arthrotomy photo of patella (P) before OA induction revealed no chondral degenerations (black arrow). (d) The arthroscopic images after OA inductions at MFC and MTP showed slight indentations and moderate focal lesions (white arrows). (e) Arthroscopic images after OA inductions at the PFG revealed severe and prominent chondral erosion (white arrows). (f) The arthroscopic images after OA inductions at P, which is the opposite contact of PFG, depicted degenerations of cartilage caused by the frictional contacts. Arthroscopy scale  = 0.5 cm, Arthrotomy  = 1.5 cm.
Figure 2. Multipotency evaluations of ADSCs and…
Figure 2. Multipotency evaluations of ADSCs and BMSCs.
(a) Inverted phase contrast images of the Adipogenic inductions of ADSCs and BMSCs. The image depicted the collection of fat droplets in clusters (black arrows) from day 4 of the inductions process. The oil red staining showed that lipids formed on both induced cell samples, picked up red stain (white arrow) showing their positivity to adipogenic lineage. Scale  = 70 µm. (b) Inverted phase contrast images of the osteogenic inductions of ADSCs and BMSCs. The picture revealed similar clustered mineralization on both cell samples from day 4 of the inductions process. The evaluation of the induced ADSCs and BMSCs with alizarin red staining demonstrated some mineralization activities (white arrow) showing their commitment to osteogenic lineage. Scale  = 70 µm. (c) Inverted phase contrast images of the chondrogenic inductions of ADSCs and BMSCs. The picture revealed similar aggregation of the cells in condensations seen in early chondrogenesis from day 4 of the inductions process. The evaluation of the induced ADSCs and BMSCs with toluidine blue staining demonstrated that the condensed matrixes picked up the blue stain (red arrows), showing their positivity to chondrogenic lineage. Scale  = 70 µm.
Figure 3. Monolayer analysis of BMSCs and…
Figure 3. Monolayer analysis of BMSCs and ADSCs.
(a) The morphological images of the BMSCs and ADSCs from P0 to P4. BMSC looked more spindle upon isolation and early attachment, while ADSCs were broader (P0-P1). Both cell samples attain the same size and shape as the passage progressed from P2–P4 showing more mesenchymal-like structure. Scale bar represents 35 µm. (b) The Morphological changes of the cells during chondrogenic differentiation. BMSCs formed the aggregates of cartilage in a film-like sheet, more readily than ADSCs. The aggregates and sheet clumped together (white arrow) to form a firm cartilage structure by 3rd week. ADSCs split its formed aggregates and dispersed on the medium. Scale represents 35 µm. (c) The Population doubling time (PDT) of the cell samples during culture. ADSCs were 34.4±1.6 hrs, while that of BMSCs were 48.8±5.3 hrs. ADSCs had a significantly higher growth rate compared to the BMSCs with P value of 0.008. (d) The viability of cells after trypsinization, at the end of each passage. From P0–P4, BMSCs had mean viabilities of (87, 88, 92, 86, and 90); while ADSCs had (93, 96, 95, 96, and 95) respectively. ADSCs had higher viabilities at each passage compare to BMSCs but were significantly higher at P1, P2 and P3; P<0.05.
Figure 4. Gene expression analysis of ADSCs…
Figure 4. Gene expression analysis of ADSCs and BMSCs.
(a) Comparison of the gene expressions of chondrogenically induced ADSCs to the uninduced. After 21 days of induction, the induced samples had significantly higher expressions of Col II, SOX9, Aggrecan and Col I genes in fold increases of (12.96, 23.44, 44.36 and 18.44) respectively compare to the uninduced (week 1 post-isolation) cells, with P values (∞) respectively (P<0.05). (b) Comparison of the gene expressions of chondrogenically induced BMSCs to the uninduced. After 21 days of induction, the induced samples had significantly higher expressions of Col II, SOX9, Aggrecan and Col I genes in fold increases of (16.21, 51.40, 120.33 and 19.17) respectively compare to the uninduced (week 1 post-isolation) cells, with P values (*) respectively (P<0.05). Comparing the Induced ADSCs and Induced BMSCs, BMSCs had significantly higher expressions of Col II, Aggrecan and SOX9 genes in fold increases of (1.85, 2.03 and 5.31) respectively with P values (**) (p<0.05). There was no significance difference on Col I expression.
Figure 5. The gross evaluations of the…
Figure 5. The gross evaluations of the right knee joint samples.
(a) The gross images of knee representing the six regions. Patella femoral groove (PFG), medial femoral condyle (MFC), lateral femoral condyle (LFC), medial tibia plateau (MTP), lateral tibia plateau (LTP) and patella (P) were used as reference points. The treated knees showed regenerations. At PFG, the regenerated cartilages had unique morphological appearances different from the native (black ring); the control still retained severe cartilage degeneration (black ring). At MFC, the ADSCs still retain a slight focal defect (black arrow); BMSCs had no sign of defect, while the control retained severe cartilage degeneration (black ring). At LFC, there were no lesions on the treated knees, but the control had reduced cartilage thickness (black arrow). At MTP, both treated samples revealed structural appearances of a crescent regenerating meniscus-like cartilage (black arrow), but none at the control. There is no evidence of meniscus regeneration on the medial tibia plateau (yellow arrow). There is also a remnant of resected spur bone formed at the anterior region of the medial tibia plateau (white arrow), which is a supportive mechanism seen in severe OA. At the LTP, there were no conspicuous lesions at the treated samples but the control retained a severe degeneration (black ring). At P, the control presented worse degeneration compared to either of the ADSCs or BMSCs (black arrows). (M =  medial, and L =  lateral). Scale represents 1.5 cm. (b) Combined gross and histological ICRS grading of the right knee joints. The control sheep scored a mean grade of 3.33±0.2, while the test groups ADSCs and BMSCs scored 1.5±0.2 and 1.3±0.3 respectively. Both treated sheep samples had significantly higher grades (*) and (**) respectively compared to the control P<0.05. BMSCs treated sheep had better grade score than ADSCs, but was not significant P = 0.465.
Figure 6. Fluorescence evaluations of PKH26 dye…
Figure 6. Fluorescence evaluations of PKH26 dye on the resected regenerated cartilages.
Samples were taken from PFG and MFC of the BMSCs samples; then from MTP and P of the ADSCs samples. PKH26 fluorescence was shown in 2D, the composite images and 3D images. The composite and 3D confocal images revealed the integration and arrangements of the labeled chondrogenically induced cells. The fluorescence of the dye proved the participation of the injected cells in the cartilage regeneration. Scale: gross images  = 1.5 cm and microscopic images  = 35 µm.
Figure 7. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations of…
Figure 7. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations of the right knee joints.
(a) Haematoxylin and Eosin stain of the right knee joint PFG samples. Yellow arrow points at the exposed area of cartilage, leading to subchondral bone (green arrow) of the control knee joints. Treated samples (BMSCs and ADSCs) reflected regenerated engineered cartilages (white arrows) covering the subchondral bone, though not smoothly packed like the native cartilage (black arrow). Scale represents 70 µm. (b) Safranin O stains of the right knee joint (patella) samples. The regenerated cartilage on both treated knee (BMSCs and ADSCs) stained positive (white arrow). They were homogenous to the histochemical properties of accumulated proteoglycans revealed via Safranin O, but not smooth as the native cartilage (black arrow). Yellow arrow points at the degenerated area of cartilage on the control; green arrow, the subchondral bone. Scale represents 70 µm. (c) Immunohistochemistry images of the right knee joint (PFG) samples. Collagen type II protein staining for both treated samples (BMSCs and ADSCs) demonstrated positive staining within the ground tissues and were visible throughout the matrixes, evidenced by the green fluorescence tagged with the secondary antibody (black arrow). The native articular cartilage served as positive control (black arrow). The absence of green fluorescence on the ground tissue of the engineered cartilages without the primary antibody (yellow arrow) served as the negative control. Scale represents 35 µm. (d) Immunohistochemistry images of the right knee joint (PFG) samples. SOX9 staining for BMSCs and ADSCs demonstrated positivity within the ground tissues and were visible throughout the matrixes by the green fluorescence tagged with the secondary antibody (black arrow). The native articular cartilage served as positive control (black arrow), while the absence of green fluorescence on the ground tissue of the engineered cartilages without the primary antibody (yellow arrow) served as the negative control. Scale represents 35 µm. (e) Immunohistochemistry images of the right knee joint (PFG) samples. Collagen type I staining for BMSCs and ADSCs demonstrated diminished positivity within the ground tissues. This occurred mainly as scattered clusters of the green fluorescence tagged with the secondary antibody (black arrow). The fibrous cartilage served as positive control (black arrow), while the absence of green fluorescence on the ground tissue of the engineered cartilages without the primary antibody (yellow arrow) served as the negative control. Scale represents 35 µm. Note: The authors wish to state that a superimposed histological image of Safranin O and PKH26 dye or the immuno signals with PKH26 dye would have made better proves of the presence of the injected cells, but owing to technical challenges with these processes and the dye stability, it was not accomplished.

References

    1. Bradely TE, Diekman OD, Gimbe JM, Guilak F (2010) Isolation of adipose-derived stem cells and their induction to a chondrogenic phenotype. Nature Protocols 5 (7): 1294–1311.
    1. Guilak F, Bradely TE, Diekman OD, Montos FT, Gimbe JM (2010) Multipotent adult stem cells from adipose tissue for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468: 2530–2540.
    1. Murphy CL, Sambanis A (2001) Effect of oxygen tension and alignate encapsulation on restoration of the differentiated phenotype of passaged chondrocyte. Tissue Eng 7: 791–803.
    1. Aichroth PM, Patel DV, Moyes ST (1991) A prospective review of arthroscopic debridement for degenerative joint disease of the knee. Int. Orthop 15: 351–355.
    1. Aubin PP, Cheah HK, Davis AM, Gross AE (2007) Long-term followup of fresh femoral osteochondral allografs for posttraumatic knee defect. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res (Suppl 391): S318–S327.
    1. Tew SR, Kwan AP, Hann A, Thomson BM, Archer CW (2000) The reactions of articular cartilage to experimental wounding: role of apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum 43: 251–225.
    1. Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, Chen CW, Corselli M, Park TS, et al. (2008) A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 3: 301–313.
    1. Al Faqeh H, NorHamdan BMY, Chen HC, Aminuddin BS, Ruszymah BHI (2012) The potential of intra-articular injection of chondrogenic-induced bone marrow stem cells to retard the progression of osteoarthritis in a sheep model. Experimental Gerontology 47: 458–464.
    1. Chen K, Man C, Zhang B, Hu J, Zhu S-S (2013) Effect of in vitro chondrogenic differentiation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells on cartilage and subchondral cancellous bone repair in osteoarthritis of temporomandibular joint. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 42 (2): 240–248.
    1. Mifune Y, Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ota S, Li H, et al. (2013) The effect of platelet – rich plasma on the regenerative therapy of muscle derived stem cells for articular repair. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 21 (1): 175–185.
    1. Murphy JM, David JF, Hunziker EB, Barry FP (2003) Stem Cell Therapy in a Caprine Model of Osteoarthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 48(12): 3464–3477.
    1. Dragoo JL, Carlson G, Mccormick F, Khan-Farooqi H, Min Z, et al. (2007) Healing Full-Thickness Cartilage Defects using Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Tissue Engineering 13: 7.
    1. Centeno CJ, Busse D, Kisiday J, Keohan C, Freeman M, et al. (2008) Increased Knee Cartilage Volume in Degenerative Joint Disease using Percutaneously Implanted, Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Pain Physician 11: 343–353.
    1. Horan PK, Slezak SE (1989) Stable Cell Membrane Labeling; Nature. 340: 67–168.
    1. Sigma. Staining optimization for PKH Dyes (1993) Research. 53: 2360.
    1. Alfaqeh H, Norhamdan MY, Chua KH, Chen HC, Aminuddin BS, et al. (2008) Cell Therapy for Osteoarthritis in Sheep Model, gross and histological assessment. The Medical Journal of Malaysia. 63(Supp A): : 37.
    1. Wickham MQ, Erickson GR, Gimble JM, Vail TP, Guilak F (2003) Multipotent Stromal Cells Derived From the Infrapatellar Fat Pad of the Knee. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research: July 2003 - Volume 412 - Issue - pp 196–212 doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Ude CC, Shamsul BS, Ng MH, Chen HC, Aminuddin BS (2012) Bone marrow and adipose stem cells can be tracked with PKH26 until post staining passage 6 invitro and invivo. Tissue and Cell. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.
    1. Alfaqeh HH, Chua KH, Aminuddin BS, Ruszymah BHI (2011) Growth medium with low medium and transforming growth factor beta 3 promotes better chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived stem cells in vitro and invivo. Saudi Med. J 32 (6): 640–641.
    1. Brian OD, Christopher RR, Donald PL, Arnold IC, Guilak F (2010) Chondrogenesis of adult stem cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow: Induction by growth factors and cartilage-derived matrix. Tissue Engineering: part A. Vol.16..
    1. Aust L, Devlin B, Foster SJ, Halvorsen YD, Hicok K, et al. (2004) Yield of human adipose-derived adult stem cells from liposuction aspirates. Cytotherapy 6: 7.
    1. Oedayrajsingh-Varma MJ, VanHam SM, Knippenberg M, Helder Mn, Klein-Nulend J, et al. (2006) Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell yield and growth characteristics are affected by the tissue-harvesting procedure. Cytotherapy 8: 166–177.
    1. Im GI, Shin YW, Lee KB (2005) Do adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells? Osteoarthritis Cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Res Soc 13: 845.
    1. Rider DA, Dombrowski C, Sawyer AA, Ng GH, Leong D, et al. (2008) Autocrine fibroblast growth factor 2 increases the multipotentiality of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells (Dayton) 26: 1598.
    1. Izadpanah R, Trygg C, Patel B, Kriedt C, Dufour J, et al. (2006) Biologic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue. J Cell Biochem 99: 1285.
    1. Puetzer JL, Petitte JN, Loboa EG (2010) Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 16(4): 435–444.
    1. Mehlhorn AT, Niemeyer P, Kaiser S, Finkenzeller G, Stark GB, et al. (2006) Differential expression pattern of extracellular matrix molecules during chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue. Tissue Eng 12: 2853.
    1. Munirah S, Aminuddin BS, Samsudin OC, Chua KH, Fuzina NH (2005) The re-expression of Collagen II, Aggrecan and SOX9 in tissue engineered hman articular cartilage. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2(4): 347–355.
    1. Hennig T, Lorenz H, Thiel A, Goetzke K, Dickhut A (2007) Reduced chondrogenic potential of adipose tissue derived stromal cells correlates with an altered TGF beta receptor and BMP profile and is overcome by BMP-6. J Cell Physiol 211: 682.
    1. Adila AH, Ruszymah BHI, Aminuddin BS, Somasumdaram S, Chuaa KH (2012) Characterization of human adipose-derived stem cells and expression of chondrogenic genes during induction of cartilage differentiation. Clinics 67(2): 99–106.
    1. Kim HJ, Im GI (2009) Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells: greater doses of growth factor are necessary. J Orthop Res 27: 612.
    1. Sha'ban M, Samsudin OC, NorHamdan MY, Aminuddin BS, Ruszymah BHI (2012) Sox-9 transient transfection enhances chondrogenic osteoarthritic in vitro: Preliminary Analysis. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 8(1): 32–41.
    1. Hunziker EB (2002) Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10: 432–463.
    1. Saw KY, Adam A, Shahrin M, Tay YG, Kunaseegaran R, et al. (2010) Articular Cartilage Regeneration with Autologous Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells and Hyaluronic Acid after Arthroscopic Subchondral Drilling: A Report of 5 Cases with Histology. J. Arthro 11: 054 Doi: 10. 1016/.
    1. Maumus M, Guérit D, Toupet K, Jorgensen C, Noël D (2011) Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapies in Regenerative Medicine: Applications in Rheumatology. Stem Cell Res. Ther 2 (2): 14.
    1. Pak J (2011) Regeneration of Human Bones in Hip Osteonecrosis and Human Cartilage in Knee Osteoarthritis with Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells: A Case Series. Pak Journal of Medical Case Reports 5: 296.
    1. Gnecchi M, Zhang Z, Aiguo N, Dzau VJ (2008) Paracrine Mechanisms in Adult Stem Cell Signaling and Therapy. Circ Res 103: 1204–1219.
    1. Ratajczak MZ, Kucia M, Jadczyk T, Greco NJ, Wojakowski W (2012) Pivotal role of paracrine effects in stem cell therapies in regenerative medicine: can we translate stem cell-secreted paracrine factors and micro vesicles into better therapeutic strategies? Leukemia. 26: , 1166–1173.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe