Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with tennis elbow: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Chenxiao Zheng, Dongjie Zeng, Jiayi Chen, Sijing Liu, Jianyi Li, Zhaohai Ruan, Wusheng Liang, Chenxiao Zheng, Dongjie Zeng, Jiayi Chen, Sijing Liu, Jianyi Li, Zhaohai Ruan, Wusheng Liang

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave (ECSW) in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE) of humerus.

Hypothesis: ECSW therapy in people with LE effectively reduces the pain and gains functional rehabilitation.

Materials/methods: Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2020 was searched to identify all relevant RCTs comparing ECSW therapy with any other conservative treatment, including injection and local anesthetic versus placebo or control in patients aged 18 with LE. The primary outcome is the mean overall pain score at 12 weeks after treatment. Another secondary outcome mainly included Thomsen test, 50% pain reduction, grip strength and adverse effect at 12 weeks after treatment.

Results: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the placebo group, ECSW cannot significantly reduce the pain score (mean deviation [MD] = -4.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.78 to 0.32, P = .07), but make more people acquire 50% pain reduction (MD = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.75, P = .008). There was no significant difference between ECSW and control in decreasing the pain score of Thomsen test (MD = -3.22, 95% CI: -14.06 to 7.62, P = .56). ECSW was more effective in Grip strength as compared with control at 12 weeks-3 months (MD = 3.52, 95% CI: 2.43 to 4.60, P < .00001) CONCLUSIONS:: Results suggested that ECSW cannot effectively reduce the mean overall pain, but it showed more people acquire 50% pain reduction and might be a better option for the treatment of LE. Because of study limitations, additional high level of evidence, more rigorously designed large-samples and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to guide clinical practice.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of studies identified, included, and excluded according to the format of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot and meta-analysis of mean overall pain. CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance methods, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot and meta-analysis of 50% pain reduction. CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance methods, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot and meta-analysis of Thomsen test. CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance methods, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot and meta-analysis of Grip strength. CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance methods, SD = standard deviation.

References

    1. Verhaar JA. Tennis elbow. Anatomical, epidemiological and therapeutic aspects. Int Orthop 1994;18:263–7.
    1. Smidt N, van der Windt DA. Tennis elbow in primary care. BMJ 2006;333:927–8.
    1. Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H, et al. Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study. Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:1065–74.
    1. Arrigoni P, Cucchi D, D’Ambrosi R, et al. Arthroscopic R-LCL plication for symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow (SMILE). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25:2264–70.
    1. Arrigoni P, Cucchi D, D’Ambrosi R, et al. Intra-articular findings in symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow (SMILE). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25:2255–63.
    1. Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA. Tennis elbow. The surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61(6A):832–9.
    1. Eygendaal D, Rahussen FTG, Diercks RL. Biomechanics of the elbow joint in tennis players and relation to pathology. Br J Sports Med 2007;41:820–3.
    1. Han-Sung L, Youn PH, O.Y.J., et al. Musicians’ medicine: musculoskeletal problems in string players. Clin Orthop Surg 2013;5:155.
    1. Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. A new integrative model of lateral epicondylalgia. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:252–8.
    1. Rath AM, Perez M, Mainguené C, et al. Anatomic basis of the physiopathology of the epicondylalgias: a study of the deep branch of the radial nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 1993;15:144–144.
    1. Schmitz C, N.B.C., S.M., et al. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database. Br Med Bull 2015;116:115.
    1. Taylor J, Dunkerley S, Silver D, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for refractory Achilles tendinopathy: a prospective audit with 2-year follow up. Foot 2015;26:23–9.
    1. Wang C-J. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. J Orthop Surg Res 2012;7(1, article 11):11.
    1. Rompe JD, Hope C, Kullmer K, et al. Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on chronic tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:233–7.
    1. Melegati G, Tornese D, Bandi M, et al. Comparison of two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy: a randomized study. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:366–70.
    1. Speed CA, Nichols D, Humphreys H, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis - a double blind randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Res 2010;20:895–8.
    1. Chung B. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of previously untreated lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:1660–7.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
    1. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002.
    1. Ing-Jeng, Chen, Ke-Vin, et al. Ultrasound parameters other than the direct measurement of ulnar nerve size for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;100:1114–30.
    1. Lin CP, Chen IJ, Chang KV, et al. Utility of ultrasound elastography in evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019;45:2855–65.
    1. Pettrone FA, Mccall BR. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia for chronic lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1297–304.
    1. D’Vaz AP, Ostor AJ, Speed CA, et al. Pulsed low-intensity ultrasound therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:566–70.
    1. Staples MP, Forbes A, Ptasznik R, et al. A randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow). J Rheumatol 2008;35:2038–46.
    1. Sabeti M, Dorotka R, Goll A, et al. Focussed extracorporeal shockwave therapy for tennis elbow. Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin 2008;18:83–6.
    1. Collins ED, Hildreth DH, Jafarnia KK. A clinical study of extracorporeal shock waves (ESW) for treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis. Current Orthopaedic Practice 2011;22:185–92.
    1. Devrimsel G, Turkyilmaz AK, Yildirim M, et al. A Comparison of laser and extracorporeal shock wave therapies in treatment of lateral epicondylitis. FTR - Turkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2014;60:194–8.
    1. Vulpiani Maria C. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs cryoultrasound therapy in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis. one year follow up study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2015;5:167–74.
    1. Capan N, Esmaeilzadeh S, Oral A, et al. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is not more effective than placebo in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016;95:495–506.
    1. Böddeker I, Haake M. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in treatment of epicondylitis humeri radialis. A current overview. Der Orthopäde 2000;29:463–9.
    1. Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM, et al. Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;CD003524.
    1. Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylagia. Br J Sports Med 2005;39:411–22.
    1. Mehra A, Zaman T, Jenkin AIR. The use of a mobile lithotripter in the treatment of tennis elbow and plantar fasciitis. Surgeon 2003;1:290–2.
    1. Yang TH, Huang YC, Lau YC, et al. Efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on lateral epicondylosis, and changes in the common extensor tendon stiffness with pretherapy and posttherapy in real-time sonoelastography: a randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016;96:93.
    1. Lee SS, Kang S, Park NK, et al. Effectiveness of initial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the newly diagnosed lateral or medial epicondylitis. Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36:681–7.
    1. Terra BB, Rodrigues LM, Filho AN, et al. Arthroscopic treatment for chronic lateral epicondylitis. Rev Bras Ortop 2015;50:395–402.
    1. Othman AMA. Arthroscopic versus percutaneous release of common extensor origin for treatment of chronic tennis elbow. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:383–8.
    1. Ozkut AT, Kilincoglu V, Ozkan NK, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007;41:207–10.
    1. Malay DS, Pressman MM, Assili A, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter intervention trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006;45:196–210.
    1. Haake M, Thon A, Bette M. No influence of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on spinal nociceptive systems. J Orthop Sci 2002;7:97–101.
    1. Melikyan EY, Shahin E, Miles J, et al. Extracorporeal shock-wave treatment for tennis elbow. A randomised double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:852–5.
    1. Crowther MA, Bannister GC, Huma H, et al. A prospective, randomised study to compare extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and injection of steroid for the treatment of tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:678–9.
    1. Spacca G, Necozione S, Cacchio A. Radial shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomised controlled single-blind study. Eura Medicophys 2005;41:17–25.
    1. Beyazal MS, Devrimsel G. Comparison of the effectiveness of local corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:3755–8.
    1. Haake M, König IR, Decker T, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:1392.
    1. Wong WY, Ng EY-L, Fung P-W, et al. Comparison of treatment effects on lateral epicondylitis between acupuncture and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2017;7(Complete):21–6.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe