Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the 'Happy-Productive Worker Thesis'

M Esther García-Buades, José M Peiró, María Isabel Montañez-Juan, Malgorzata W Kozusznik, Silvia Ortiz-Bonnín, M Esther García-Buades, José M Peiró, María Isabel Montañez-Juan, Malgorzata W Kozusznik, Silvia Ortiz-Bonnín

Abstract

The happy-productive worker thesis (HPWT) assumes that happy employees perform better. Given the relevance of teams and work-units in organizations, our aim is to analyze the state of the art on happy-productive work-units (HPWU) through a systematic review and integrate existing research on different collective well-being constructs and collective performance. Research on HPWU (30 studies, 2001-2018) has developed through different constructs of well-being (hedonic: team satisfaction, group affect; and eudaimonic: team engagement) and diverse operationalizations of performance (self-rated team performance, leader-rated team performance, customers' satisfaction, and objective indicators), thus creating a disintegrated body of knowledge about HPWU. The theoretical frameworks to explain the HPWU relationship are attitude-behavior models, broaden-and-build theory, and the job-demands-resources model. Research models include a variety of antecedents, mediators, and moderating third variables. Most studies are cross-sectional, all propose a causal happy-productive relationship (not the reverse), and generally find positive significant relationships. Scarce but interesting time-lagged evidence supports a causal chain in which collective well-being leads to team performance (organizational citizenship behavior or team creativity), which then leads to objective work-unit performance. To conclude, we identify common issues and challenges across the studies on HPWU, and set out an agenda for future research.

Keywords: affect; engagement; happy; performance; productive; satisfaction; team; work-unit.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Work-unit effectiveness: facets and sources of evaluation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Process of analysis and selection of research papers on happy–productive teams and work-units. Notes. SAT = satisfaction; AFF = group affect; ENG = engagement; *Exclusion criteria: sample (no work sample), quality of the study (meta-analyses, review), analyses (individual data analyses, no correlation data), measures (no satisfaction measures, no performance measures), and happy–productive relationship (happy and productive as dependent variables).

References

    1. Iaffaldano M.T., Muchinsky P.M. Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1985;97:251–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251.
    1. Judge T.A., Thoresen C.J., Bono J.E., Patton G.K. The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychol. Bull. 2001;127:376–407. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376.
    1. Bowling N.A., Khazon S., Meyer R.D., Burrus C.J. Situational strength as a moderator of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analytic examination. J. Bus. Psychol. 2015;30:89–104. doi: 10.1007/s10869-013-9340-7.
    1. Harrison D.A., Newman D.A., Roth P.L. How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Acad. Manag. J. 2006;49:305–325. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.20786077.
    1. Barsade S.G., Knight A.P. Group Affect. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2015;2:21–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316.
    1. Bailey C., Madden A., Alfes K., Fletcher L. The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2017;19:31–53. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12077.
    1. Christian M.S., Garza A.S., Slaughter J.E. Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Pers. Psychol. 2011;64:89–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x.
    1. Bowling N.A. Is the job satisfaction-job performance relationship spurious? A meta-analytic examination. J. Vocat. Behav. 2007;71:167–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.007.
    1. Peiró J.M., Kozusznik M.W., Rodríguez Molina I., Tordera N. The happy-productive worker model and beyond: Patterns of wellbeing and performance atwork. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030479.
    1. Eurofound . Sixth European Working Conditions Survey—Overview Report (2017 Update) Publications Office of the European Union; Luxemburgo: 2017.
    1. Knight A.P., Eisenkraft N. Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015;100:1214–1227. doi: 10.1037/apl0000006.
    1. Whitman D.S., Van Rooy D.L., Viswesvaran C. Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Pers. Psychol. 2010;63:41–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01162.x.
    1. Peiró J.M., Ayala Y., Tordera N., Lorente L., Rodríguez I. Sustainable well-being at work: A review and reformulation. Papeles del Psicólogo. 2014;35:5–14.
    1. Warr P., Nielsen K. Wellbeing and work performance. In: Diener E., Oishi S., Tay L., editors. E-Handbook of Subjective Wellbeing. DEF Publishers; Salt Lake City, UT, USA: 2018. pp. 1–31.
    1. Fisher C.D. Happiness at work. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2010;12:384–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x.
    1. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001;52:141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
    1. Sonnentag S. Dynamics of well-being. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2015;2:261–293. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111347.
    1. Porath C., Spreitzer G., Gibson C., Garnett F.G. Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J. Organ. Behav. 2012;33:250–275. doi: 10.1002/job.756.
    1. Paterson T.A., Luthans F., Jeung W. Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. J. Organ. Behav. 2014;35:434–446. doi: 10.1002/job.1907.
    1. Spreitzer G., Sutcliffe K., Dutton J., Sonenshein S., Grant A.M. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organ. Sci. 2005;16:537–549. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0153.
    1. Hart P.M., Cotton P., Scollay C.E. Flourishing at work: Improving wellbeing and engagement. In: Burke R.J., Page K.M., Cooper C.L., editors. Flourishing in Life, Work and Careers: Individual Wellbeing and Career Experiences. Edward Elgar; Cheltenham, UK: 2015. pp. 281–313.
    1. Lorente L., Tordera N., Peiró J.M. How work characteristics are related to European workers’ psychological well-being. A comparison of two age groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010127.
    1. Ryff C.D., Singer B.H. Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 2008;9:13–39. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.
    1. Ashkanasy N.M., Härtel C.E.J. In: Positive and Negative Affective Climate and Culture. Schneider B., Barbera K.M., editors. Oxford University Press; Oxônia, UK: 2014.
    1. González-Romá V., Peiró J.M., Subirats M., Mañas M.A. The Validity of Affective Work Team Climates. In: Vartiainen M., Avallone F., Anderson N., editors. Innovative Theories, Tools, and Practices in Work and Organizational Psychology. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2000. pp. 97–109.
    1. Kozlowski S.W.J., Klein K.J. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. 1st ed. Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, CA, USA: 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes; pp. 3–90.
    1. Cole M.S., Bedeian A.G., Hirschfeld R.R., Vogel B. Dispersion-composition models in multilevel research. Organ. Res. Methods. 2011;14:718–734. doi: 10.1177/1094428110389078.
    1. Chan D. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psychol. 1998;83:234–246. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234.
    1. Bliese P.D. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: Klein K.J., Kozlowski S.W.J., editors. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, CA, USA: 2000. pp. 349–381.
    1. LeBreton J., Senter J. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods. 2007;11:815–852. doi: 10.1177/1094428106296642.
    1. Salas E., Sims D.E., Burke C.S. Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Gr. Res. 2005;36:555–599. doi: 10.1177/1046496405277134.
    1. Salas E., Reyes D.L., Woods A.L. Innovative Assessment of Collaboration. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2017. The Assessment of Team Performance: Observations and Needs; pp. 21–36.
    1. Koys D.J. The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Pers. Psychol. 2001;54:101–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00087.x.
    1. Taris T.W., Schreurs P.J.G. Well-being and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work Stress. 2009;23:120–136. doi: 10.1080/02678370903072555.
    1. Mason C.M., Griffin M.A. Group task satisfaction. The group’s shared attitude to its task and work environment. Gr. Organ. Manag. 2005;30:625–652. doi: 10.1177/1059601104269522.
    1. Messersmith J.G., Patel P.C., Lepak D.P., Gould-Williams J. Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2011;96:1105–1118. doi: 10.1037/a0024710.
    1. Van De Voorde K., Van Veldhoven M., Paauwe J. Relationships between work unit climate and labour productivity in the financial sector: A longitudinal test of the mediating role of work satisfaction. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2014;23:295–309. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.729312.
    1. Rego A., Reis Júnior D., Cunha M.P.E., Stallbaum G. Store creativity, store potency, store performance, retailing. Manag. Res. 2016;14:130–149. doi: 10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2015-0624.
    1. González-Romá V., Gamero N. Does positive team mood mediate the relationship between team climate and team performance? Psicothema. 2012;24:94–99.
    1. Dolbier C.L., Webster J.A., McCalister K.T., Mallon M.W., Steinhardt M.A. Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. Am. J. Heal. Promot. 2005;19:194–198. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.3.194.
    1. Ironson G.H., Smith P.C., Brannick M.T., Gibson W.M., Paul K.B. Construction of a job in general scale: A Comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. J. Appl. Psychol. 1989;74:193–200. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.193.
    1. Weiss D.J., Dawis R.V., England G.W. Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Stud. Vocat. Rehabil. 1967;22:120.
    1. Judge T.A., Weiss H.M., Kammeyer-Mueller J.D., Hulin C.L. Job attitudes, job satisfaction, and job affect: A century of continuity and of change. J. Appl. Psychol. 2017;102:356–374. doi: 10.1037/apl0000181.
    1. George J.M. Leader Positive Mood and Group Performance: The Case of Customer Service. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1995;25:778–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01775.x.
    1. Chi N.W., Chung Y.Y., Tsai W.C. How do happy leaders enhance team success? The mediating roles of transformational leadership, group affective tone, and team processes. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2011;41:1421–1454. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00767.x.
    1. Tanghe J., Wisse B., van der Flier H. The formation of group affect and team effectiveness: The moderating role of identification. Br. J. Manag. 2010;21:340–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00656.x.
    1. Barsade S., Gibson D.E. Group emotion: A view from top and bottom. In: Neale M.A., Mannix E., editors. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. JAI; Creenwich, CT, USA: 1998. pp. 81–102.
    1. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1988;54:1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
    1. Segura S.L., González-Romá V. How do respondents construe ambiguous response formats of affect items? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003;85:956–968. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.956.
    1. Boerner S., Von Streit C.F. Promoting orchestral performance: The interplay between musicians’ mood and a conductor’s leadership style. Psychol. Music. 2007;35:132–143. doi: 10.1177/0305735607068891.
    1. Kahn W.A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 1990;33:692–724.
    1. Macey W., Schneider B. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2008;1:3–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x.
    1. Schneider B., Macey W.H., Barbera K.M. Driving customer satisfaction and financial success through employee engagement. People Strateg. 2009;32:23–27.
    1. Schneider B., Yost A.B., Kropp A., Kind C., Lam H. Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for organizational performance. J. Organ. Behav. 2018;39:462–480. doi: 10.1002/job.2244.
    1. Harter J., Schmidt F., Hayes T. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002;87:268–279. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268.
    1. Schaufeli W.A., Salanova M., González-Romá V., Bakker A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002;3:71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326.
    1. Cruz-Ortiz V., Salanova M., Martínez I. Liderazgo transformacional y desempeño grupal: Unidos por el engagement grupal. Rev. Psicol. Soc. 2013;28:183–196. doi: 10.1174/021347413806196762.
    1. Torrente P., Salanova M., Llorens S., Schaufeli W.B. Teams make it work: How team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema. 2012;24:106–112.
    1. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev. Int. 2008;13:209–223. doi: 10.1108/13620430810870476.
    1. Torrente P., Salanova M., Llorens S. Spreading engagement: On the role of similarity in the positive contagion of work engagement. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2013;29:153–159. doi: 10.5093/tr2013a21.
    1. Costa P., Passos A.M., Bakker A. Empirical validation of the team work engagement construct. J. Pers. Psychol. 2014;13:34–45. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000102.
    1. Tims M., Bakker A.B., Derks D., van Rhenen W. Job crafting at the team and individual level: Implications for work engagement and performance. Gr. Organ. Manag. 2013;38:427–454. doi: 10.1177/1059601113492421.
    1. Torrente P., Salanova M., Llorens S., Schaufeli W.B. From “I” to “We”: The factorial validity of a team work engagement scale. In: Neves J., Gonçalves S., editors. Occupational Health Psychology: From Burnout to Well-Being. Scientific & Academic Publishing; Rosemead, CA, USA: 2013. pp. 335–355.
    1. Vittersø J., Søholt Y. Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. J. Posit. Psychol. 2011;6:326–335. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.584548.
    1. Barrick M.R., Thurgood G.R., Smith T.A., Courtright S.H. Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Acad. Manag. J. 2015;58:111–135. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0227.
    1. Ostroff C. The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 1992;77:963–974. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.6.963.
    1. Kopelman R.E., Brief A.P., Guzzo R.A. The role of climate and culture in productivity. In: Schneider B., editor. Organizational Climate and Culture. Jossey-Bass Inc.; San Francisco, CA, USA: 1990. pp. 282–318.
    1. Blau P.M. Justice in Social Exchange. Sociol. Inq. 1964;34:193–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x.
    1. Li F., Li Y., Wang E. Task characteristics and team performance: The mediating effect of team member satisfaction. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 2009;37:1373–1382. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2009.37.10.1373.
    1. Namasivayam K., Guchait P., Lei P. The influence of leader empowering behaviors and employee psychological empowerment on customer satisfaction. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2014;26:69–84. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-11-2012-0218.
    1. Bowen D.E., Schneider B. A service climate synthesis and future research agenda. J. Serv. Res. 2014;17:5–22. doi: 10.1177/1094670513491633.
    1. Schneider B., White S.S., Paul M.C. Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Test of a causal model. J. Appl. Psychol. 1998;83:150–163. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.150.
    1. Heskett J.L., Sasser W., Schlesinger L. The Service Profit Chain: How Leading Companies Link Profit and Growth to Loyalty, Satisfaction, and Value. Free Press; New York, NY, USA: 1997.
    1. Fredrickson B.L. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am. Psychol. 2001;56:218–226. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.
    1. Martin L.L., Stoner P. Mood as input: What we think. In: Martin L.L., Tesser A., editors. Striving and Feeling: Interactions Among Goals, Affect, and Self-Regulation. L. Erlbaum Associates; Mahwah, NJ, USA: 1996. pp. 279–301.
    1. Rhee S.Y. Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member interactions. In: Mannix E., Neale M., Anderson C., editors. Affect and Groups (Research on Managing Groups and Teams) Volume 10. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; Bingley, UK: 2007. pp. 65–95.
    1. Meneghel I., Salanova M., Martínez I.M. Feeling good makes us stronger: How team resilience mediates the effect of positive emotions on team performance. J. Happiness Stud. 2016;17:239–255. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9592-6.
    1. Seong J.Y., Choi J.N. Effects of group-level fit on group conflict and performance: The initiating role of leader positive affect. Gr. Organ. Manag. 2014;39:190–212. doi: 10.1177/1059601113517138.
    1. Shin Y. Positive group affect and team creativity: Mediation of team reflexivity and promotion focus. Small Gr. Res. 2014;45:337–364. doi: 10.1177/1046496414533618.
    1. Kim M., Shin Y. Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity. Asia Pacific J. Manag. 2015;32:693–716. doi: 10.1007/s10490-015-9413-4.
    1. Peñalver J., Salanova M., Martínez I.M., Schaufeli W.B. Happy-productive groups: How positive affect links to performance through social resources. J. Posit. Psychol. 2019;14:377–392. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1402076.
    1. Kim M.J., Choi J.N., Lee K. Trait affect and individual creativity: Moderating roles of affective climate and reflexivity. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2016;44:1477–1498. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2016.44.9.1477.
    1. Tu C. A multilevel investigation of factors influencing creativity in NPD teams. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2009;38:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.10.001.
    1. Chi N.W., Huang J.C. Mechanisms linking transformational leadership and team performance: The mediating roles of team goal orientation and group affective tone. Gr. Organ. Manag. 2014;39:300–325. doi: 10.1177/1059601114522321.
    1. Tsai W.C., Chi N.W., Grandey A.A., Fung S.-C. Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. J. Organ. Behav. 2012;33:638–656. doi: 10.1002/job.775.
    1. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., Sanz-Vergel A.I. Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2014;1:389–411. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235.
    1. Costa P.L., Passos A.M., Bakker A.B. Direct and contextual influence of team conflict on team resources, team work engagement, and team performance. Negot. Confl. Manag. Res. 2015;8:211–227. doi: 10.1111/ncmr.12061.
    1. Mäkikangas A., Aunola K., Seppälä P., Hakanen J. Work engagement–team performance relationship: Shared job crafting as a moderator. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2016;89:772–790. doi: 10.1111/joop.12154.
    1. Reijseger G., Schaufeli W., Peeters M., Taris T. Ready, set, go! A Model of the relation between work engagement and job performance. In: Gonçalves S.P., Neves J.G., editors. Occupational Health Psychology: From Burnout to Well-Being. Volume 1. Scientific & Academic Publishing; Rosemead, CA, USA: 2012. pp. 287–306.
    1. García-Buades E., Martínez-Tur V., Ortiz-Bonnín S., Peiró J.M. Engaged teams deliver better service performance in innovation climates. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2016;25:597–612. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2016.1171752.
    1. Salanova M., Agut S., Peiró J.M. Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. J. Appl. Psychol. 2005;90:1217–1227. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217.
    1. Luu T.T. Collective job crafting and team service recovery performance: A moderated mediation mechanism. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2017;35:641–656. doi: 10.1108/MIP-02-2017-0025.
    1. McClelland G.P., Leach D.J., Clegg C.W., McGowan I. Collaborative crafting in call centre teams. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2014;87:464–486. doi: 10.1111/joop.12058.
    1. Riketta M. The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008;93:472–481. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472.
    1. Schneider B., Hanges P.J., Smith D.B., Salvaggio A.N. Which comes first: Employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? J. Appl. Psychol. 2003;88:836–851. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.836.
    1. Bashshur M.R., Hernández A., González-Romá V. When managers and their teams disagree: A longitudinal look at the consequences of differences in perceptions of organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 2011;96:558–573. doi: 10.1037/a0022675.
    1. Menguc B., Auh S., Katsikeas C.S., Jung Y.S. When does (mis)fit in customer orientation matter for frontline employees’ job satisfaction and performance? J. Mark. 2016;80:65–83. doi: 10.1509/jm.15.0327.
    1. Henderson L., Knight T. Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. Int. J. Wellbeing. 2012;2:196–221. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v2i3.3.
    1. Salanova M., Schaufeli W.B., Xanthopoulou D., Bakker A.B. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology Press; East Sussex, UK: 2010. The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife; pp. 118–131.
    1. Xanthopoulou D., Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., Schaufeli W.B. Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2009;82:183–200. doi: 10.1348/096317908X285633.
    1. Singh A., Syal M., Grady S.C., Korkmaz S. Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. Am. J. Public Health. 2010;100:1665–1668. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180687.
    1. Gil F., Rico R., Alcover C.M., Barrasa Á. Change-oriented leadership, satisfaction and performance in work groups: Effects of team climate and group potency. J. Manag. Psychol. 2005;20:312–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940510589073.
    1. Brady G.M., Truxillo D.M., Cadiz D.M., Rineer J.R., Caughlin D.E., Bodner T. Opening the Black Box: Examining the Nomological Network of Work Ability and Its Role in Organizational Research. J. Appl. Psychol. 2019 doi: 10.1037/apl0000454.
    1. Truxillo D.M., Cadiz D.M., Rineer J.R. Oxford Handbooks Online: Business & Management. Oxford University Press; Oxônia, Inglaterra, UK: 2014. The Aging Workforce: Implications for Human Resource Management Research and Practice.
    1. Ayala Y., Peiró Silla J.M., Tordera N., Lorente L., Yeves J. Job Satisfaction and Innovative Performance in Young Spanish Employees: Testing New Patterns in the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis—A Discriminant Study. J. Happiness Stud. 2017;18:1377–1401. doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9778-1.
    1. Hauff S., Richter N.F., Tressin T. Situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: The moderating role of national culture. Int. Bus. Rev. 2015;24:710–723. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.01.003.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe