A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Treat-and-Extend vs. Pro Re Nata Regimen for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Huixun Jia, Bing Lu, Yuanzhi Yuan, Fei Yuan, Lei Li, Yanping Song, Ao Rong, Minwen Zhou, Fenghua Wang, Xiaodong Sun, Huixun Jia, Bing Lu, Yuanzhi Yuan, Fei Yuan, Lei Li, Yanping Song, Ao Rong, Minwen Zhou, Fenghua Wang, Xiaodong Sun

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of conbercept using a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen vs. a pro re nata (PRN) regimen in Chinese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods: This was a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority study. After an initial loading phase of three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg Conbercept, the patients were treated to PRN or T&E regimen. The prespecified retreatment criteria was defined as a more than 5-letter decrease in BCVA from the previous visit or any evidence of new retinal hemorrhages, or the presence of any IRF and any SRF of more than 200 μm in height at the sub-foveal center. The primary outcome was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to 24 months, with a prespecified non-inferiority limit of -5 letters.

Results: From July 2016 through August 2018, 141 participants were allocated and treated (T&E, n = 69; PRN, n = 72). About one fifth of the overall participants were dropped out during the 12-month follow-up (28/141, 19.9%), and about one thirds of the overall participants were lost during the 24-month follow-up (51/141, 36%). At 2 years, mean BCVA letter improvement was + 4.0 in the T&E group vs. + 5.1 in the PRN group, and T&E regimen was not non-inferior to PRN regimen [difference, -1.169 letters; 95% confidence interval (CI): -6.864 ∼ 4.526]. Subgroup analyses also demonstrate the similar results in PCV patients, naive patients and no-naive patients. The mean decrease in central subfield thickness were 180 ± 165 μm in the T&E group and 247 ± 230 μm in the PRN group, respectively. The patients in the PRN group had required significantly fewer injections than those in the T&E group (12.4 vs. 14.6 injections, P = 0.041). The types and rates of adverse events were comparable in the two treatment groups.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the T&E regimen was not non-inferior to the PRN regimen in patients with nAMD in terms of BCVA outcomes through 24 months.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02802657.

Keywords: anti-VEGF; neovascular age-related macular degeneration; non-inferiority study; pro re nata; treat-and-extend.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Jia, Lu, Yuan, Yuan, Li, Song, Rong, Zhou, Wang and Sun.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The flowchart of the study.

References

    1. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CM, Klein R, Cheng CY, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. (2014) 2:e106–16. 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1
    1. Garweg JG, Gerhardt C. Disease stability and extended dosing under anti-VEGF treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) – a meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2021) 259:2181–92. 10.1007/s00417-020-05048-1
    1. Brown DM, Michels M, Kaiser PK, Heier JS, Sy JP, Ianchulev T, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of the ANCHOR study. Ophthalmology. (2009) 116:57–65.e5. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.018
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. (2006) 355:1419–31.
    1. Chakravarthy U, Harding SP, Rogers CA, Downes SM, Lotery AJ, Wordsworth S, et al. Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial. Ophthalmology. (2012) 119:1399–411. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.04.015
    1. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Fine SL, Ying GS, Jaffe GJ, Grunwald JE, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthalmology. (2012) 119:1388–98.
    1. Singer MA, Awh CC, Sadda S, Freeman WR, Antoszyk AN, Wong P, et al. HORIZON: an open-label extension trial of ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. (2012) 119:1175–83. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.016
    1. Wykoff CC, Ou WC, Brown DM, Croft DE, Wang R, Payne JF, et al. Randomized trial of treat-and-extend versus monthly dosing for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 2-year results of the TREX-AMD study. Ophthalmol Retina. (2017) 1:314–21. 10.1016/j.oret.2016.12.004
    1. Liu K, Song Y, Xu G, Ye J, Wu Z, Liu X, et al. Conbercept for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results of the randomized phase 3 PHOENIX study. Am J Ophthalmol. (2019) 197:156–67.
    1. Guymer RH, Markey CM, McAllister IL, Gillies MC, Hunyor AP, Arnold JJ, et al. Tolerating subretinal fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab using a treat-and-extend regimen: FLUID study 24-month results. Ophthalmology. (2019) 126:723–34. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.025
    1. Silva R, Berta A, Larsen M, Macfadden W, Feller C, Monés J, et al. Treat-and-extend versus monthly regimen in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results with ranibizumab from the TREND study. Ophthalmology. (2018) 125:57–65. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.014
    1. López Gálvez MI, Arias Barquet L, Figueroa MS, García-Layana A, Ruiz Moreno JM, In-Eye Study Group. Bimonthly, treat-and-extend and as-needed ranibizumab in naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients: 12-month outcomes of a randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol. (2020) 98:e820–9. 10.1111/aos.14399
    1. Scassellati-Sforzolini B, Mariotti C, Bryan R, Yannuzzi LA, Giuliani M, Giovannini A, et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Italy. Retina. (2001) 21:121–5. 10.1097/00006982-200104000-00004
    1. Koh A, Lai TYY, Takahashi K, Wong TY, Chen LJ, Ruamviboonsuk P, et al. Efficacy and safety of ranibizumab with or without verteporfin photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2017) 135:1206–13. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4030
    1. Lee WK, Iida T, Ogura Y, Chen SJ, Wong TY, Mitchell P, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in the PLANET study: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2018) 136:786–93. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1804
    1. Matsumiya W, Honda S, Kusuhara S, Tsukahara Y, Negi A. Effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD): comparison between typical neovascular AMD and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy over a 1 year follow-up. BMC Ophthalmol. (2013) 13:10. 10.1186/1471-2415-13-10
    1. Saito M, Iida T, Kano M. Intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative age-related macular degeneration with good baseline visual acuity. Retina. (2012) 32:1250–9. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318236e503
    1. Koizumi H, Yamagishi T, Yamazaki T, Kinoshita S. Relationship between clinical characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and choroidal vascular hyperpermeability. Am J Ophthalmol. (2013) 155:305–313.e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.07.018
    1. Pak KY, Park SW, Byon IS, Lee JE. Treat-and-extend regimen using ranibizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: one-year results. Retina. (2017) 37:561–7. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001195
    1. Lim TH, Lai TYY, Takahashi K, Wong TY, Chen LJ, Ruamviboonsuk P, et al. Comparison of ranibizumab with or without verteporfin photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: the EVEREST II randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2020) 138:935–42. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2443
    1. Sadda SR, Tuomi LL, Ding B, Fung AE, Hopkins JJ. Macular atrophy in the HARBOR study for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. (2018) 125:878–86.
    1. Kertes PJ, Galic IJ, Greve M, Williams G, Baker J, Lahaie M, et al. Efficacy of a treat-and-extend regimen with ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2020) 138:244–50. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5540
    1. Byeon SH, Lew YJ, Lee SC, Kwon OW. Clinical features and follow-up results of pulsating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treated with photodynamic therapy. Acta Ophthalmol. (2010) 88:660–8. 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01517.x
    1. Wong CW, Cheung CM, Mathur R, Li X, Chan CM, Yeo I, et al. Three-year results of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treated with photodynamic therapy: retrospective study and systematic review. Retina. (2015) 35:1577–93. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000499
    1. Kang HM, Kim YM, Koh HJ. Five-year follow-up results of photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. (2013) 155:438–447.e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.09.020
    1. Unnebrink K, Windeler J. Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases. Stat Med. (2001) 20:3931–46. 10.1002/sim.1149

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe