Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Characterization of Malignant versus Benign Focal Liver Lesions in a Prospective Multicenter Experience - The SRUMB Study
Ioan Sporea, Daniela Larisa Săndulescu, Roxana Şirli, Alina Popescu, Mirela Danilă, Zeno Spârchez, Cătălina Mihai, Simona Ioanițescu, Tudor Moga, Bogdan Timar, Ciprian Brisc, Dana Nedelcu, Adrian Săftoiu, Viorela Enăchescu, Radu Badea, Ioan Sporea, Daniela Larisa Săndulescu, Roxana Şirli, Alina Popescu, Mirela Danilă, Zeno Spârchez, Cătălina Mihai, Simona Ioanițescu, Tudor Moga, Bogdan Timar, Ciprian Brisc, Dana Nedelcu, Adrian Săftoiu, Viorela Enăchescu, Radu Badea
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the differential diagnosis of benign vs. malignant focal liver lesions (FLL) in a real-life, multicenter experience.
Methods: This prospective study, including 14 Romanian centers, was performed over a 6 year period (February 2011- April 2017) and included 2062 FLLs assessed by CEUS. Inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed FLL on B-mode ultrasound, less than three lesions/patient, all FLLs evaluated by CEUS and by a second-line imaging technique (contrast enhanced CT or contrast enhanced MRI) or histology, considered as reference. The trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT01329458).
Results: From the 2062 FLLs included in the study, 57.2% (1179) were malignant and 42.8% (883) were benign. CEUS had 83.9% sensitivity (Se), 97.8% specificity (Sp), 98.1% positive predictive value (PPV), 82.2% negative predictive value (NPV) and a diagnostic accuracy (Ac) of 89.9% for the positive diagnosis of malignant lesions. For the benign lesions, CEUS had 97.8% Se, 83.9% Sp, 82.2% PPV, 98.1% NPV 89.9% Ac. The diagnostic performance of CEUS for hepatocellular carcinoma was 76.6% Se, 98.4% Sp, and 91.2% Ac; for hemangioma: 89.2% Se, 99% Sp, and 96.9% Ac and for metastases: 90.9% Se, 98.4% Sp, and 96.9% Ac.
Conclusions: CEUS proved a high accuracy in differentiating the malignant vs. benign character of a FLL. It can be confidently used as a first line imaging method in daily practice.
Source: PubMed