Online mindfulness-based intervention for women with pregnancy distress: design of a randomized controlled trial

Lianne P Hulsbosch, Ivan Nyklíček, Eva S Potharst, Margreet Meems, Myrthe G B M Boekhorst, Victor J M Pop, Lianne P Hulsbosch, Ivan Nyklíček, Eva S Potharst, Margreet Meems, Myrthe G B M Boekhorst, Victor J M Pop

Abstract

Background: Psychological distress during pregnancy is common: up to 20% of the childbearing women experience symptoms of depression and anxiety. Apart from the adverse effects on the woman herself, pregnancy distress can negatively affect pregnancy outcomes, infant health, postpartum mother-child interaction and child development. Therefore, the development of interventions that reduce pregnancy distress is very important. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) show promising positive effects on pregnancy distress, but there is a need for randomized controlled trials with sufficient power. Trials on online MBIs, which are readily accessible and not expensive, also show positive effects on stress reduction in non-pregnant populations. Moreover, specific working mechanisms of MBIs remain unclear. The aim of the current study is to test the effectiveness of an online MBI in pregnant women with pregnancy distress, as well as exploring potential working mechanisms.

Methods: The current study is a randomized controlled trial with repeated measures. Consenting women with elevated levels of pregnancy distress will be randomized into an intervention group (MBI) or control group (care as usual) around 12 weeks of pregnancy, with an intended sample size of 103 women in each group. The primary outcome, pregnancy distress, will be assessed via questionnaires at baseline, halfway through the intervention and post intervention in both intervention and control group, and after 8 weeks follow-up in the intervention group. Secondary outcomes are mindfulness skills, rumination and self-compassion, which are also seen as potential working mechanisms, and will be assessed via questionnaires before intervention, halfway through the intervention, post intervention and after 8 weeks follow-up in the intervention group. Tertiary outcome variables are obstetric data and will be collected from the obstetric records for both intervention and control group. Analyses will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. Multilevel regression models for repeated measures (mixed models) will be used to evaluate changes in primary and secondary outcome variables. Tertiary outcomes will be compared between groups using independent t-tests and Chi Square analyses.

Discussion: The trial is expected to increase knowledge about the effectiveness of online MBIs during pregnancy in women with pregnancy distress and to evaluate potential working mechanisms.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03917745, registered on 4 March 2019. Protocol Version 3.0., 20 February 2020.

Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Mindfulness; Online intervention; Pregnancy distress.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Marcus SM, Flynn HA, Blow FC, Barry KL. Depressive symptoms among pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003;12(4):373–380. doi: 10.1089/154099903765448880.
    1. Meijer JL, Bockting CL, Stolk RP, Kotov R, Ormel J, Burger H. Associations of life events during pregnancy with longitudinal change in symptoms of antenatal anxiety and depression. Midwifery. 2014;30(5):526–531. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.008.
    1. Dohrenwend BP, Shrout PE, Egri G, Mendelsohn FS. Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology. Measures for use in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37(11):1229–1236. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780240027003.
    1. Alder J, Fink N, Bitzer J, Hosli I, Holzgreve W. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: a risk factor for obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcome? A critical review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(3):189–209. doi: 10.1080/14767050701209560.
    1. Andersson L, Sundstrom-Poromaa I, Wulff M, Astrom M, Bixo M. Implications of antenatal depression and anxiety for obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):467–476. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000135277.04565.e9.
    1. Grote NK, Bridge JA, Gavin AR, Melville JL, Iyengar S, Katon WJ. A meta-analysis of depression during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(10):1012–1024. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.111.
    1. Staneva A, Bogossian F, Pritchard M, Wittkowski A. The effects of maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth: a systematic review. Women Birth. 2015;28(3):179–193. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.02.003.
    1. Zhu P, Tao F, Hao J, Sun Y, Jiang X. Prenatal life events stress: implications for preterm birth and infant birthweight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.023.
    1. Pearson RM, Cooper RM, Penton-Voak IS, Lightman SL, Evans J. Depressive symptoms in early pregnancy disrupt attentional processing of infant emotion. Psychol Med. 2010;40(4):621–631. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709990961.
    1. Glover V. Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; what needs to be done. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.017.
    1. Bergman K, Sarkar P, O'Connor TG, Modi N, Glover V. Maternal stress during pregnancy predicts cognitive ability and fearfulness in infancy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46(11):1454–1463. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31814a62f6.
    1. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, et al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1800–1819. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61277-0.
    1. Evans K, Morrell CJ, Spiby H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety in pregnant women. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(2):289–309. doi: 10.1111/jan.13456.
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics. Jonge vrouwen relatief vaak vermoeid door werk. 2018 [Available from: ]. Accessed 16 Oct 2019.
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics. Ziekteverzuim - cijfers & context. 2017 [Available from: ]. Accessed 16 Oct 2019.
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics. Arbeidsdeelname en werkloosheid per maand. 2019. [Available from: ]. Accessed 16 Oct 2019.
    1. Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, Oh D. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(2):169–183. doi: 10.1037/a0018555.
    1. Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, Carlson L, Anderson ND, Carmody J, Segal ZV, Abbey S, Speca M, Velting D, Devins G. Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2004;11:230–241. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bph077.
    1. Fjorback LO, Arendt M, Ornbol E, Fink P, Walach H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124(2):102–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01704.x.
    1. Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V, et al. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(6):763–771. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005.
    1. Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE, Fournier C. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(6):519–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.009.
    1. van Son J, Nyklíček I, Pop VJ, Blonk MC, Erdtsieck RJ, Spooren PF, et al. The effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on emotional distress, quality of life, and HbA (1c) in outpatients with diabetes (DiaMind): a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):823–830. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1477.
    1. Alsubaie M, Abbott R, Dunn B, Dickens C, Keil TF, Henley W, et al. Mechanisms of action in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in people with physical and/or psychological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;55:74–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.008.
    1. Gu J, Strauss C, Bond R, Cavanagh K. How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;37:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006.
    1. van der Velden AM, Kuyken W, Wattar U, Crane C, Pallesen KJ, Dahlgaard J, et al. A systematic review of mechanisms of change in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in the treatment of recurrent major depressive disorder. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;37:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.001.
    1. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J, Fredrickson BL. Response styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood. J Abnorm Psychol. 1993;102(1):20–28. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.102.1.20.
    1. Neff KD. Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Identity. 2003;2:223–250. doi: 10.1080/15298860309027.
    1. Isgut M, Smith AK, Reimann ES, Kucuk O, Ryan J. The impact of psychological distress during pregnancy on the developing fetus: biological mechanisms and the potential benefits of mindfulness interventions. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(9):999–1011. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0189.
    1. Nyklíček I, Truijens SEM, Spek V, Pop VJM. Mindfulness skills during pregnancy: prospective associations with mother's mood and neonatal birth weight. J Psychosom Res. 2018;107:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.01.012.
    1. Dhillon A, Sparkes E, Duarte RV. Mindfulness-based interventions during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness (N Y) 2017;8(6):1421–1437. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0726-x.
    1. Hall HG, Beattie J, Lau R, East C, Anne BM. Mindfulness and perinatal mental health: a systematic review. Women Birth. 2016;29(1):62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.006.
    1. Lever Taylor B, Cavanagh K, Strauss C. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in the perinatal period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155720.
    1. Matvienko-Sikar K, Lee L, Murphy G, Murphy L. The effects of mindfulness interventions on prenatal well-being: a systematic review. Psychol Health. 2016;31(12):1415–1434. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2016.1220557.
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics. Geboorte; kerncijfers 2019 [Available from: ]. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics. Internet, toegang, gebruik en faciliteiten 2018 [Available from: ]. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
    1. Spijkerman MP, Pots WT, Bohlmeijer ET. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: a review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;45:102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009.
    1. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
    1. Pop VJ, Komproe IH, van Son MJ. Characteristics of the Edinburgh post Natal depression scale in the Netherlands. J Affect Disord. 1992;26(2):105–110. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(92)90041-4.
    1. Bergink V, Kooistra L, Lambregtse-van den Berg MP, Wijnen H, Bunevicius R, van Baar A, et al. Validation of the Edinburgh depression scale during pregnancy. J Psychosom Res. 2011;70(4):385–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.008.
    1. de Cock ES, Emons WH, Nefs G, Pop VJ, Pouwer F. Dimensionality and scale properties of the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the DiaDDzoB study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-141.
    1. Truijens SE, Meems M, Kuppens SM, Broeren MA, Nabbe KC, Wijnen HA, et al. The HAPPY study (holistic approach to pregnancy and the first postpartum year): design of a large prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:312. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-312.
    1. Pop VJ, Pommer AM, Pop-Purceleanu M, Wijnen HA, Bergink V, Pouwer F. Development of the Tilburg pregnancy distress scale: the TPDS. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-80.
    1. Boekhorst M, Beerthuizen A, Van Son M, Bergink V, Pop VJM. Psychometric aspects of the Tilburg pregnancy distress scale: data from the HAPPY study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019.
    1. Truijens SEM, Nyklíček I, van Son J, Pop VJM. Validation of a short form three facet mindfulness questionnaire (TFMQ-SF) in pregnant women. Personal Individ Differ. 2016;93:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.037.
    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006;13(1):27–45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504.
    1. Bohlmeijer E, ten Klooster PM, Fledderus M, Veehof M, Baer R. Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment. 2011;18(3):308–320. doi: 10.1177/1073191111408231.
    1. de Bruin EI, Topper M, Muskens JG, Bogels SM, Kamphuis JH. Psychometric properties of the five facets mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment. 2012;19(2):187–197. doi: 10.1177/1073191112446654.
    1. Trapnell PD, Campbell JD. Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflection. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76(2):284–304. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284.
    1. Nyklíček I, Denollet J. Development and evaluation of the balanced index of psychological mindedness (BIPM) Psychol Assess. 2009;21(1):32–44. doi: 10.1037/a0014418.
    1. Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(3):250–255. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702.
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and ilness. New York: Delacourt; 1990.
    1. Segal Z, Williams JM, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: second edition. New York: The Guilford Press; 2013.
    1. Potharst ES, Boekhorst M, Cuijlits I, van Broekhoven KEM, Jacobs A, Spek V, et al. A randomized control trial evaluating an online mindful parenting training for mothers with elevated parental stress. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01550.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe