Evaluation of the effects of high-level laser and electrocautery in lingual frenectomy surgeries in infants: protocol for a blinded randomised controlled clinical trial

Adriana Mazzoni, Ricardo Scarparo Navarro, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Pamella Barros Motta, Tamiris Silva, Andréa Oliver Gomes, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Paula Taboada Sobral, Elaine Marcilio Santos, Lara Jansiski Motta, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Adriana Mazzoni, Ricardo Scarparo Navarro, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Pamella Barros Motta, Tamiris Silva, Andréa Oliver Gomes, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Paula Taboada Sobral, Elaine Marcilio Santos, Lara Jansiski Motta, Sandra Kalil Bussadori

Abstract

Introduction: Ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) is an anomaly characterised by an abnormally short, thick or small lingual frenulum that restricts tongue movements. This condition is considered one of the factors that can interfere with breast feeding by diminishing the ability of the newborn to latch adequately. According to the Brazilian Health Ministry, the prevalence of this anomaly among newborns is 3%-16%. Frenectomy is the most suitable surgical procedure for the treatment of ankyloglossia. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of electrocautery and high-power diode laser as forms of frenectomy.

Methods and analysis: The proposed study will be a randomised, controlled, blind clinical trial involving the participation of healthy infants 0-3 months of age with breastfeeding difficulty and a diagnosis of tongue-tie with an indication for lingual frenectomy. The guardians will receive clarifications regarding the procedures and will authorise the participation of the infants by signing a statement of informed consent. A non-blinded researcher will perform the screening and procedures and a blinded researcher will perform the postoperative evaluations. Fifty-six infants will be randomly allocated into two groups (n=28): the electrocautery group or the high-power laser group. The preparation of the patients, asepsis and infection control procedures will rigorously follow biosafety norms. For both groups, patient histories will be taken, clinical evaluations will be performed and a standardised photograph of the lingual frenulum will be taken before surgery. The Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool will be used. We will evaluate pain in the mother during breast feeding before, immediately after, and 15 days after surgery.

Ethics and dissemination: This protocol was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of Nove de Julho University, having been given a favourable opinion (Number: 4387769). Results will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT04487418.

Keywords: laser therapy; oral medicine; paediatric oral & maxillofacial surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Nicoloso GF, dos Santos IS, Flores JA, et al. . An alternative method to treat ankyloglossia. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;40:319–21. 10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.319
    1. Barreto KA, Lira TCB. Anquiloglossia versus amamentação: qual a evidência de associação? Rev CEFAC 2020;22:12219.
    1. Procopio IMS, Costa VPP, Lia EN. Frenotomia lingual em lactentes. Rev da Fac de Odontologia, UPF 2017;22:2017. 10.5335/rfo.v22i1.6849
    1. Varadan M, Chopra A, Sanghavi AD, et al. . Etiology and clinical recommendations to manage the complications following lingual frenectomy: a critical review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;120:549–53. 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.003
    1. Lima MPCSL WR. Anquiloglossia E frenectomia lingual: relato de caso clínico em adolescente. São Paulo, 2009.
    1. Navarro RS, Gontijo I, Haypek P. Eduardo C de P. lasers em odontopediatria: estado dA arte. Odontopediatria na Prim infância 2009.
    1. Gontijo I, Navarro RS, Haypek P, et al. . The applications of diode and Er:YAG lasers in labial frenectomy in infant patients. J Dent Child 2005;72:10–15.
    1. Pompéia LE, Ilinsky RS, Feijóortolani CL. Ankyloglossia and its influence on growth and development of the stomatognathic system [Internet]. Vol. 35, Revista Paulista de Pediatria. Sao Paulo Pediatric Society 2017:216–21.
    1. Marchesan IQ, Martinelli RLdeC, Gusmão RJ. Lingual frenulum: changes after frenectomy. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2012;24:409–12. 10.1590/s2179-64912012000400020
    1. Hazelbaker AK. Assessment tool for lingual frenulum function (ATLFF). Clin Lactation 2017;8:132–3. 10.1891/2158-0782.8.3.132
    1. Ingram J, Johnson D, Copeland M, et al. . The development of a tongue assessment tool to assist with tongue-tie identification. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015;100:F344–9 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307503
    1. Araujo MdaCM, Freitas RL, Lima MGdeS, et al. . Evaluation of the lingual frenulum in newborns using two protocols and its association with breastfeeding. J Pediatr 2020;96:379–85. 10.1016/j.jped.2018.12.013
    1. Aras MH, Göregen M, Güngörmüş M, et al. . Comparison of diode laser and Er:YAG lasers in the treatment of ankyloglossia. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28:173–7 10.1089/pho.2009.2498
    1. Husein A. Applications of lasers in dentistry: a review. Arch Orofac Sci 2006;1.
    1. Rosa PMM, Rosa PSM. Diagnóstico E tratamento cirúrgico do freio labial CoM inserção marginal: relato de caso. Periodontia 2018;28:56–60.
    1. Garg AK. Lasers in dental implantology: innovation improves patient care. Dent Implantol Update 2007;18:57–61.
    1. Turner RJ, Cohen RA, Voet RL, et al. . Analysis of tissue margins of cone biopsy specimens obtained with "cold knife," CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers and a radiofrequency surgical unit. J Reprod Med 1992;37:607–10.
    1. Gáspár L. The use of high-power lasers in oral surgery. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1994;12:281–5. 10.1089/clm.1994.12.281
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al. . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–91. 10.3758/BF03193146
    1. Haytac MC, Ozcelik O. Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: a comparison of carbon dioxide laser and scalpel techniques. J Periodontol 2006;77:1815–9. 10.1902/jop.2006.060043
    1. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, et al. . The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45–56. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4
    1. Nunes JEP, da SAL, Nunes GP. Lasers applied to frenectomy in pediatric patients with ankyloglossia. RSD 2021;10:e19210210434
    1. Silva CL dos S, Melo HB, do NLLC. Superior labial frenectomy using a diode surgical laser: a case report of a pediatric patient. RSD 2020;9:e91691110684
    1. Gujjari SK, Shubhashini PV. Frenectomy: a review with the reports of surgical techniques. J Clin Diagn Res 2012;6:1587–92. 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4089.2572

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe