Eccentric training combined to neuromuscular electrical stimulation is not superior to eccentric training alone for quadriceps strengthening in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial

Claudia Ferreira Gomes da Silva, Felipe Xavier de Lima E Silva, Karoline Baptista Vianna, Gabriel Dos Santos Oliveira, Marco Aurélio Vaz, Bruno Manfredini Baroni, Claudia Ferreira Gomes da Silva, Felipe Xavier de Lima E Silva, Karoline Baptista Vianna, Gabriel Dos Santos Oliveira, Marco Aurélio Vaz, Bruno Manfredini Baroni

Abstract

Background: Both eccentric training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are used for quadriceps strengthening. However, the effects of these interventions combined are unclear.

Objectives: To compare the effects of eccentric training combined to NMES and eccentric training alone on structure, strength, and functional performance of knee extensor muscles of healthy subjects.

Methods: This is a three-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Forty-three volunteers (18-35 years) completed the full study schedule: control group (n=15); eccentric training group (ECC; n=15); and eccentric training combined to NMES group (ECC+NMES; n=13). Eccentric training program was performed twice a week for 6 weeks. A biphasic pulsed current (400μs; 80Hz; maximal tolerated intensity) was applied simultaneously to voluntary exercise for ECC+NMES group. Muscle structure (ultrasonography of vastus lateralis - VL, and rectus femoris - RF), strength (isokinetic dynamometry) and functional capacity (single hop test) were assessed before and after the training program by blinded researchers to groups allocation.

Results: Control group had no changes throughout the study in any outcome. Eccentric training (with or without NMES) did not affect concentric peak torque, hop test, and VL pennation angle (effect sizes>0.2). ECC and ECC+NMES programs generated significant adaptations (small to moderate effect sizes) on isometric (8-11%) and eccentric (13%) peak torques, VL muscle thickness (5%), VL fascicle length (5-8%), RF muscle thickness (8-9%), RF pennation angle (-2%), and RF fascicle length (12%).

Conclusion: NMES combined to eccentric training did not influence consistently the type or magnitude of adaptations provoked by knee extensor eccentric training alone in healthy subjects.

Keywords: Eccentric exercise; Electrostimulation; Knee extensor.

Copyright © 2018 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Exercise execution during training sessions – bilateral concentric movement phase for ∼1 s (A) and unilateral eccentric phase for ∼4 s (B). Images also show the positioning of electrodes used in the ECC + NMES group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Magnitude-based inference for all outcomes among the three experimental groups (see methods for details). ISO, isometric; CON, concentric; ECC, eccentric; VL, vastus lateralis; RF, rectus femoris.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe