Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PA) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma (PREV-CART)

4. august 2026 opdateret af: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A Multicentric Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Open-label, Comparing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) and Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma

B cell (CD19) targeted chimeric antigen receptor modified T Cells (CAR-T) has transformed treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-cell lymphoma (BCL).

Because patients receiving CAR-T often present uncontrolled disease and have undergone several lines of treatment, they may be deeply immuno-depressed and prone to infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia were reported in 74% of patients preCAR-T cells infusion (Hill JA, et al. Blood Rev. 2019 Nov). CART cells also results in depletion of normal CD19+ B cells and hypogammaglobulinemia as an on-target, off tumor toxicity.

Because CAR-T cells can persist for years, patients are exposed to infectious complications secondary to long-term Bcell aplasia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia (<4g/l). Data from patients who received rituximab (CD20-specific monoclonal antibody) show that patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia experienced recurrent bronchitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and rarely, enteroviral meningoencephalitis. In patients receiving CAR T-cells, infection density is 0.55-0.67 infections/100 days3,5 at risk after the first month with a majority of respiratory and ENT (earsnose-throat) infections. To prevent infections, anti-bacterial prophylaxis (AP) based on local guidelines is often used in patients treated by CAR-T cells, with the risk of subsequent resistance. Otherwise, intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is authorized by the French authorities for patients with secondary antibody deficiencies who developed severe or recurrent infections after appropriate antimicrobial therapy, if IgG levels <4g/l. However, although IgRT as primary prophylaxis (PP) have no approval, they are used as PP after CAR T-cells by many centers, with no data supporting such a strategy. The benefit of IgRT over AP as a primary prophylaxis in the setting of CD19 CAR-T cells therapy should be demonstrated given its burden for patients and care, as well as its cost and the risk of Ig shortage. Therefore, this multi-centric prospective randomized openlabel study aims to assess the benefits of IgRT versus AP as PP in patients with secondary antibody deficiencies.

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

228

Fase

  • Fase 3

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 16-80 years at inclusion
  2. B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or a B-cell lymphoma
  3. With gamma globulins <4g/L at the time of screening
  4. Receiving CD19-targeted autologous CAR-T cells (with AMM in their indication)
  5. Patients with childbearing potential* should have reliable contraception for the all duration of the study and another 12 months after CAR-T infusion.
  6. Contraceptive measures for concerned patients
  7. Informed consent signed by patient or legal representatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any medical history of intolerance to intravenous immunoglobulin
  2. With renal failure calculated glomerular filtrate rate <30 mL / min;
  3. With hepatic failure or hepatitis or bilirubin> 3 times the upper limit of normal, Serum ALT/AST >=5N
  4. With existing serious acute infection
  5. Contraindication to immunoglobulin or to prophylactic antibiotherapy administered in this clinical trial
  6. No health insurance coverage
  7. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  8. Participation in another interventional study or being

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebyggelse
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Immunoglobulin Replacement therapy
IgRT 0.4g/Kg IV every 4 weeks for 12 months
Aktiv komparator: Antibiotic prophylaxis
PA following each center's guidelines, for 12 months

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Occurrence of recurrent infections
Tidsramme: At 12 months
Defined by at least 2 episodes requiring a curative systemic antibiotic treatment
At 12 months
Occurrence of a severe infection
Tidsramme: At 12 months
Defined by the need of hospitalization
At 12 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Cumulative hazard of severe infections
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
requiring hospitalization
Up to 12 months
Infection-free survival rate
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Occurrence of COVID19 infection
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Cumulative incidence of readmissions due to infectious episode after hospital discharge following the infusion of CART cells
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Incidence of adverse events due to IgRT and/or PA
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts, at lymphodepletion
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 1 month
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 1 month
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 3 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 3 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 6 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 6 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 9 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 9 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 3 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 6 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 9 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 12 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 3 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 6 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 9 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 12 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 12 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

1. september 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. september 2029

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. september 2029

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

3. juli 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

4. august 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

10. august 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

10. august 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

4. august 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. august 2026

Mere information

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner