Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PA) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma (PREV-CART)

4. august 2026 oppdatert av: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A Multicentric Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Open-label, Comparing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) and Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma

B cell (CD19) targeted chimeric antigen receptor modified T Cells (CAR-T) has transformed treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-cell lymphoma (BCL).

Because patients receiving CAR-T often present uncontrolled disease and have undergone several lines of treatment, they may be deeply immuno-depressed and prone to infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia were reported in 74% of patients preCAR-T cells infusion (Hill JA, et al. Blood Rev. 2019 Nov). CART cells also results in depletion of normal CD19+ B cells and hypogammaglobulinemia as an on-target, off tumor toxicity.

Because CAR-T cells can persist for years, patients are exposed to infectious complications secondary to long-term Bcell aplasia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia (<4g/l). Data from patients who received rituximab (CD20-specific monoclonal antibody) show that patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia experienced recurrent bronchitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and rarely, enteroviral meningoencephalitis. In patients receiving CAR T-cells, infection density is 0.55-0.67 infections/100 days3,5 at risk after the first month with a majority of respiratory and ENT (earsnose-throat) infections. To prevent infections, anti-bacterial prophylaxis (AP) based on local guidelines is often used in patients treated by CAR-T cells, with the risk of subsequent resistance. Otherwise, intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is authorized by the French authorities for patients with secondary antibody deficiencies who developed severe or recurrent infections after appropriate antimicrobial therapy, if IgG levels <4g/l. However, although IgRT as primary prophylaxis (PP) have no approval, they are used as PP after CAR T-cells by many centers, with no data supporting such a strategy. The benefit of IgRT over AP as a primary prophylaxis in the setting of CD19 CAR-T cells therapy should be demonstrated given its burden for patients and care, as well as its cost and the risk of Ig shortage. Therefore, this multi-centric prospective randomized openlabel study aims to assess the benefits of IgRT versus AP as PP in patients with secondary antibody deficiencies.

Studieoversikt

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

228

Fase

  • Fase 3

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studer Kontakt Backup

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 16-80 years at inclusion
  2. B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or a B-cell lymphoma
  3. With gamma globulins <4g/L at the time of screening
  4. Receiving CD19-targeted autologous CAR-T cells (with AMM in their indication)
  5. Patients with childbearing potential* should have reliable contraception for the all duration of the study and another 12 months after CAR-T infusion.
  6. Contraceptive measures for concerned patients
  7. Informed consent signed by patient or legal representatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any medical history of intolerance to intravenous immunoglobulin
  2. With renal failure calculated glomerular filtrate rate <30 mL / min;
  3. With hepatic failure or hepatitis or bilirubin> 3 times the upper limit of normal, Serum ALT/AST >=5N
  4. With existing serious acute infection
  5. Contraindication to immunoglobulin or to prophylactic antibiotherapy administered in this clinical trial
  6. No health insurance coverage
  7. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  8. Participation in another interventional study or being

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebygging
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Immunoglobulin Replacement therapy
IgRT 0.4g/Kg IV every 4 weeks for 12 months
Aktiv komparator: Antibiotic prophylaxis
PA following each center's guidelines, for 12 months

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Occurrence of recurrent infections
Tidsramme: At 12 months
Defined by at least 2 episodes requiring a curative systemic antibiotic treatment
At 12 months
Occurrence of a severe infection
Tidsramme: At 12 months
Defined by the need of hospitalization
At 12 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Cumulative hazard of severe infections
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
requiring hospitalization
Up to 12 months
Infection-free survival rate
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Occurrence of COVID19 infection
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Cumulative incidence of readmissions due to infectious episode after hospital discharge following the infusion of CART cells
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Incidence of adverse events due to IgRT and/or PA
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts, at lymphodepletion
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 1 month
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 1 month
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 3 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 3 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 6 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 6 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 9 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 9 months
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 3 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 6 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 9 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 12 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 3 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 6 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 9 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 12 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 12 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

1. september 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

1. september 2029

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

1. september 2029

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

3. juli 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

4. august 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

10. august 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

10. august 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

4. august 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. august 2026

Mer informasjon

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere