- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT07754682
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PA) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma (PREV-CART)
A Multicentric Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Open-label, Comparing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) and Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma
B cell (CD19) targeted chimeric antigen receptor modified T Cells (CAR-T) has transformed treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-cell lymphoma (BCL).
Because patients receiving CAR-T often present uncontrolled disease and have undergone several lines of treatment, they may be deeply immuno-depressed and prone to infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia were reported in 74% of patients preCAR-T cells infusion (Hill JA, et al. Blood Rev. 2019 Nov). CART cells also results in depletion of normal CD19+ B cells and hypogammaglobulinemia as an on-target, off tumor toxicity.
Because CAR-T cells can persist for years, patients are exposed to infectious complications secondary to long-term Bcell aplasia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia (<4g/l). Data from patients who received rituximab (CD20-specific monoclonal antibody) show that patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia experienced recurrent bronchitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and rarely, enteroviral meningoencephalitis. In patients receiving CAR T-cells, infection density is 0.55-0.67 infections/100 days3,5 at risk after the first month with a majority of respiratory and ENT (earsnose-throat) infections. To prevent infections, anti-bacterial prophylaxis (AP) based on local guidelines is often used in patients treated by CAR-T cells, with the risk of subsequent resistance. Otherwise, intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is authorized by the French authorities for patients with secondary antibody deficiencies who developed severe or recurrent infections after appropriate antimicrobial therapy, if IgG levels <4g/l. However, although IgRT as primary prophylaxis (PP) have no approval, they are used as PP after CAR T-cells by many centers, with no data supporting such a strategy. The benefit of IgRT over AP as a primary prophylaxis in the setting of CD19 CAR-T cells therapy should be demonstrated given its burden for patients and care, as well as its cost and the risk of Ig shortage. Therefore, this multi-centric prospective randomized openlabel study aims to assess the benefits of IgRT versus AP as PP in patients with secondary antibody deficiencies.
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Registrering (Antatt)
Fase
- Fase 3
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Jérôme Lambert, MD PhD
- Telefonnummer: +33 +33 1 42 49 97 42
- E-post: jerome.lambert@u-paris.fr
Studer Kontakt Backup
- Navn: Florence Rabian, MD
- Telefonnummer: +33 +33 1 42 38 51 27
- E-post: florence.rabian@aphp.fr
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Barn
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 16-80 years at inclusion
- B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or a B-cell lymphoma
- With gamma globulins <4g/L at the time of screening
- Receiving CD19-targeted autologous CAR-T cells (with AMM in their indication)
- Patients with childbearing potential* should have reliable contraception for the all duration of the study and another 12 months after CAR-T infusion.
- Contraceptive measures for concerned patients
- Informed consent signed by patient or legal representatives
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any medical history of intolerance to intravenous immunoglobulin
- With renal failure calculated glomerular filtrate rate <30 mL / min;
- With hepatic failure or hepatitis or bilirubin> 3 times the upper limit of normal, Serum ALT/AST >=5N
- With existing serious acute infection
- Contraindication to immunoglobulin or to prophylactic antibiotherapy administered in this clinical trial
- No health insurance coverage
- Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Participation in another interventional study or being
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Forebygging
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Immunoglobulin Replacement therapy
|
IgRT 0.4g/Kg IV every 4 weeks for 12 months
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Antibiotic prophylaxis
|
PA following each center's guidelines, for 12 months
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of recurrent infections
Tidsramme: At 12 months
|
Defined by at least 2 episodes requiring a curative systemic antibiotic treatment
|
At 12 months
|
|
Occurrence of a severe infection
Tidsramme: At 12 months
|
Defined by the need of hospitalization
|
At 12 months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative hazard of severe infections
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
|
requiring hospitalization
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Infection-free survival rate
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
|
Occurrence of COVID19 infection
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
|
Cumulative incidence of readmissions due to infectious episode after hospital discharge following the infusion of CART cells
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
|
Incidence of adverse events due to IgRT and/or PA
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
|
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
|
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts, at lymphodepletion
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 1 month
|
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
|
At 1 month
|
|
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 3 months
|
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
|
At 3 months
|
|
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 6 months
|
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
|
At 6 months
|
|
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 9 months
|
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
|
At 9 months
|
|
Dosage of immune markers
Tidsramme: At 12 months
|
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
|
At 12 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 3 months
|
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set.
Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
|
At 3 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 6 months
|
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set.
Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
|
At 6 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 9 months
|
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set.
Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
|
At 9 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 12 months
|
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set.
Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
|
At 12 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 3 months
|
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer.
Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale.
For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning.
For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
|
At 3 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 6 months
|
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer.
Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale.
For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning.
For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
|
At 6 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 9 months
|
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer.
Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale.
For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning.
For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
|
At 9 months
|
|
Quality of life assessment
Tidsramme: At 12 months
|
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer.
Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale.
For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning.
For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
|
At 12 months
|
|
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
|
Up to 12 months
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Antatt)
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
- Neoplasmer
- Sykdommer i immunsystemet
- Infeksjoner
- Virussykdommer
- Neoplasmer etter histologisk type
- DNA-virusinfeksjoner
- Lymfesykdommer
- Lymfoproliferative lidelser
- Immunproliferative lidelser
- Lymfom, Non-Hodgkin
- Lymfom
- Epstein-Barr-virusinfeksjoner
- Herpesviridae-infeksjoner
- Tumorvirusinfeksjoner
- Hemic og lymfatiske sykdommer
- Lymfom, B-celle
- Burkitt lymfom
- Aminosyrer, peptider og proteiner
- Proteiner
- Terapeutikk
- Medikamentell terapi
- Immunoproteiner
- Blodproteiner
- Serumglobuliner
- Globuliner
- Chemoprevensjon
- Premedikasjon
- Immunoglobuliner
- Antibiotikaprofylakse
Andre studie-ID-numre
- APHP241013
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .