Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PA) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma (PREV-CART)

4. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A Multicentric Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Open-label, Comparing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) and Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma

B cell (CD19) targeted chimeric antigen receptor modified T Cells (CAR-T) has transformed treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-cell lymphoma (BCL).

Because patients receiving CAR-T often present uncontrolled disease and have undergone several lines of treatment, they may be deeply immuno-depressed and prone to infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia were reported in 74% of patients preCAR-T cells infusion (Hill JA, et al. Blood Rev. 2019 Nov). CART cells also results in depletion of normal CD19+ B cells and hypogammaglobulinemia as an on-target, off tumor toxicity.

Because CAR-T cells can persist for years, patients are exposed to infectious complications secondary to long-term Bcell aplasia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia (<4g/l). Data from patients who received rituximab (CD20-specific monoclonal antibody) show that patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia experienced recurrent bronchitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and rarely, enteroviral meningoencephalitis. In patients receiving CAR T-cells, infection density is 0.55-0.67 infections/100 days3,5 at risk after the first month with a majority of respiratory and ENT (earsnose-throat) infections. To prevent infections, anti-bacterial prophylaxis (AP) based on local guidelines is often used in patients treated by CAR-T cells, with the risk of subsequent resistance. Otherwise, intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is authorized by the French authorities for patients with secondary antibody deficiencies who developed severe or recurrent infections after appropriate antimicrobial therapy, if IgG levels <4g/l. However, although IgRT as primary prophylaxis (PP) have no approval, they are used as PP after CAR T-cells by many centers, with no data supporting such a strategy. The benefit of IgRT over AP as a primary prophylaxis in the setting of CD19 CAR-T cells therapy should be demonstrated given its burden for patients and care, as well as its cost and the risk of Ig shortage. Therefore, this multi-centric prospective randomized openlabel study aims to assess the benefits of IgRT versus AP as PP in patients with secondary antibody deficiencies.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

228

Phase

  • Phase 3

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 16-80 years at inclusion
  2. B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or a B-cell lymphoma
  3. With gamma globulins <4g/L at the time of screening
  4. Receiving CD19-targeted autologous CAR-T cells (with AMM in their indication)
  5. Patients with childbearing potential* should have reliable contraception for the all duration of the study and another 12 months after CAR-T infusion.
  6. Contraceptive measures for concerned patients
  7. Informed consent signed by patient or legal representatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any medical history of intolerance to intravenous immunoglobulin
  2. With renal failure calculated glomerular filtrate rate <30 mL / min;
  3. With hepatic failure or hepatitis or bilirubin> 3 times the upper limit of normal, Serum ALT/AST >=5N
  4. With existing serious acute infection
  5. Contraindication to immunoglobulin or to prophylactic antibiotherapy administered in this clinical trial
  6. No health insurance coverage
  7. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  8. Participation in another interventional study or being

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Immunoglobulin Replacement therapy
Arzneimittel: Immunoglobulin
IgRT 0.4g/Kg IV every 4 weeks for 12 months
Aktiver Komparator: Antibiotic prophylaxis
Arzneimittel: antibiotic prophylaxis
PA following each center's guidelines, for 12 months

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Occurrence of recurrent infections
Zeitfenster: At 12 months
Defined by at least 2 episodes requiring a curative systemic antibiotic treatment
At 12 months
Occurrence of a severe infection
Zeitfenster: At 12 months
Defined by the need of hospitalization
At 12 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Cumulative hazard of severe infections
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
requiring hospitalization
Up to 12 months
Infection-free survival rate
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Occurrence of COVID19 infection
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Cumulative incidence of readmissions due to infectious episode after hospital discharge following the infusion of CART cells
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Incidence of adverse events due to IgRT and/or PA
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts, at lymphodepletion
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Zeitfenster: At 1 month
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 1 month
Dosage of immune markers
Zeitfenster: At 3 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 3 months
Dosage of immune markers
Zeitfenster: At 6 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 6 months
Dosage of immune markers
Zeitfenster: At 9 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 9 months
Dosage of immune markers
Zeitfenster: At 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 3 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 6 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 9 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 12 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 3 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 6 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 9 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Zeitfenster: At 12 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 12 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Zeitfenster: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. September 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. September 2029

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. September 2029

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

3. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

4. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. August 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

4. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • APHP241013

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren