Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PA) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma (PREV-CART)

4 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A Multicentric Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Open-label, Comparing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT) and Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP) in Patients Treated by CD19-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T Cells for a B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or a B Cell Lymphoma

B cell (CD19) targeted chimeric antigen receptor modified T Cells (CAR-T) has transformed treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-cell lymphoma (BCL).

Because patients receiving CAR-T often present uncontrolled disease and have undergone several lines of treatment, they may be deeply immuno-depressed and prone to infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia were reported in 74% of patients preCAR-T cells infusion (Hill JA, et al. Blood Rev. 2019 Nov). CART cells also results in depletion of normal CD19+ B cells and hypogammaglobulinemia as an on-target, off tumor toxicity.

Because CAR-T cells can persist for years, patients are exposed to infectious complications secondary to long-term Bcell aplasia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia (<4g/l). Data from patients who received rituximab (CD20-specific monoclonal antibody) show that patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia experienced recurrent bronchitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and rarely, enteroviral meningoencephalitis. In patients receiving CAR T-cells, infection density is 0.55-0.67 infections/100 days3,5 at risk after the first month with a majority of respiratory and ENT (earsnose-throat) infections. To prevent infections, anti-bacterial prophylaxis (AP) based on local guidelines is often used in patients treated by CAR-T cells, with the risk of subsequent resistance. Otherwise, intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is authorized by the French authorities for patients with secondary antibody deficiencies who developed severe or recurrent infections after appropriate antimicrobial therapy, if IgG levels <4g/l. However, although IgRT as primary prophylaxis (PP) have no approval, they are used as PP after CAR T-cells by many centers, with no data supporting such a strategy. The benefit of IgRT over AP as a primary prophylaxis in the setting of CD19 CAR-T cells therapy should be demonstrated given its burden for patients and care, as well as its cost and the risk of Ig shortage. Therefore, this multi-centric prospective randomized openlabel study aims to assess the benefits of IgRT versus AP as PP in patients with secondary antibody deficiencies.

Visão geral do estudo

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

228

Estágio

  • Fase 3

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 16-80 years at inclusion
  2. B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or a B-cell lymphoma
  3. With gamma globulins <4g/L at the time of screening
  4. Receiving CD19-targeted autologous CAR-T cells (with AMM in their indication)
  5. Patients with childbearing potential* should have reliable contraception for the all duration of the study and another 12 months after CAR-T infusion.
  6. Contraceptive measures for concerned patients
  7. Informed consent signed by patient or legal representatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any medical history of intolerance to intravenous immunoglobulin
  2. With renal failure calculated glomerular filtrate rate <30 mL / min;
  3. With hepatic failure or hepatitis or bilirubin> 3 times the upper limit of normal, Serum ALT/AST >=5N
  4. With existing serious acute infection
  5. Contraindication to immunoglobulin or to prophylactic antibiotherapy administered in this clinical trial
  6. No health insurance coverage
  7. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  8. Participation in another interventional study or being

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Immunoglobulin Replacement therapy
IgRT 0.4g/Kg IV every 4 weeks for 12 months
Comparador Ativo: Antibiotic prophylaxis
PA following each center's guidelines, for 12 months

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Occurrence of recurrent infections
Prazo: At 12 months
Defined by at least 2 episodes requiring a curative systemic antibiotic treatment
At 12 months
Occurrence of a severe infection
Prazo: At 12 months
Defined by the need of hospitalization
At 12 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Cumulative hazard of severe infections
Prazo: Up to 12 months
requiring hospitalization
Up to 12 months
Infection-free survival rate
Prazo: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Occurrence of COVID19 infection
Prazo: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Cumulative incidence of readmissions due to infectious episode after hospital discharge following the infusion of CART cells
Prazo: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Incidence of adverse events due to IgRT and/or PA
Prazo: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Prazo: Up to 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts, at lymphodepletion
Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
Prazo: At 1 month
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 1 month
Dosage of immune markers
Prazo: At 3 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 3 months
Dosage of immune markers
Prazo: At 6 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 6 months
Dosage of immune markers
Prazo: At 9 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 9 months
Dosage of immune markers
Prazo: At 12 months
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 3 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 6 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 9 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 12 months
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 3 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 6 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 9 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Prazo: At 12 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
At 12 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Prazo: Up to 12 months
Up to 12 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2029

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2029

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

3 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

4 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

10 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

10 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

4 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever