Effectiveness of wound infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine by patient control analgesia pump after minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Gordan Mijovski, Matej Podbregar, Juš Kšela, Matej Jenko, Maja Šoštarič, Gordan Mijovski, Matej Podbregar, Juš Kšela, Matej Jenko, Maja Šoštarič

Abstract

Background: Local anesthetic wound infusion has become an invaluable technique in multimodal analgesia. The effectiveness of wound infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine delivered by patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump has not been evaluated in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. We tested the hypothesis that 0.2% ropivacaine wound infusion by PCA pump reduces the cumulative dose of opioid needed in the first 48 h after minithoracothomy aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 70 adult patients (31 female and 39 male) were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline wound infusion by PCA pump for 48 h postoperatively. PCA pump was programmed at 5 ml h- 1 continuously and 5 ml of bolus with 60 min lockout. Pain levels were assessed and recorded hourly by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). If NRS score was higher than three the patient was administered 3 mg of opioid piritramide repeated and titrated as needed until pain relief was achieved. The primary outcome was the cumulative dose of the opioid piritramide in the first 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were frequency of NRS scores higher than three, patient's satisfaction with pain relief, hospital length of stay, side effects related to the local anesthetic and complications related to the wound catheter.

Results: The cumulative dose of the opioid piritramide in the first 48 h after minithoracotomy AVR was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the ropivacaine (R) group median 3 mg (IQR 6 mg) vs. 9 mg (IQR 9 mg). The number of episodes of pain where NRS score was greater than three median 2 (IQR 2), vs 3 (IQR 3), (p = 0.002) in the first 48 h after surgery were significantly lower in the ropivacaine group, compared to control. Patient satisfaction with pain relief in our study was high. There were no wound infections and no side-effects from the local anesthetic.

Conclusions: Wound infusion of local anesthetic by PCA pump significantly reduced opioid dose needed and improves pain control postoperatively. We have also shown that it is a feasible method of analgesia and it should be considered in the multimodal pain control strategy following minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03079830 , date of registration: March 15, 2017. Retrospecitvely registered.

Keywords: AVR; Minithoracotomy; Multimodal analgesia; PCA; Wound catheter.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Wound catheter position. CAT-wound catheter, CD-chest drain, SW-surgical wound
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow diagram of study inclusion
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of cumulative dose of piritramide in the first 48 h postoperatively between the ropivacaine group and the 0.9% saline group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of number of episodes of NRS score higher than three in the first 48 h postoperatively between the ropivacaine group and the 0,9% saline group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of patient satisfaction between the ropivacaine group and the 0,9% saline group
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison of hospital length of stay between the ropivacaine group and the 0,9% saline group

References

    1. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of "multimodal" or "balanced analgesia" in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(5):1048–1056. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00030.
    1. Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Brunelli A, Cerfolio RJ, Gonzalez M, Ljungqvist O, Petersen RH, Popescu WM, Slinger PD, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55(1):91–115. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301.
    1. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019;43(3):659–695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.
    1. Sommer M, de Rijke JM, van Kleef M, Kessels AG, Peters ML, Geurts JW, Gramke HF, Marcus MA. The prevalence of postoperative pain in a sample of 1490 surgical inpatients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25(4):267–274. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507003031.
    1. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ: Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 2003, 97(2):534–540, table of contents.
    1. Thompson C, French DG, Costache I. Pain management within an enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 32):S3773–s3780. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.112.
    1. Buvanendran A, Kroin JS. Multimodal analgesia for controlling acute postoperative pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(5):588–593. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328330373a.
    1. Cashman JN, Dolin SJ. Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of acute postoperative pain management: evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(2):212–223. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh180.
    1. Pattinson KT. Opioids and the control of respiration. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(6):747–758. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen094.
    1. Babul N, Provencher L, Laberge F, Harsanyi Z, Moulin D. Comparative efficacy and safety of controlled-release morphine suppositories and tablets in cancer pain. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;38(1):74–81. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04380.x.
    1. Ahmedzai S, Brooks D. Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-fentanyl comparative trial group. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1997;13(5):254–261. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(97)00082-1.
    1. Fayaz MK, Abel RJ, Pugh SC, Hall JE, Djaiani G, Mecklenburgh JS. Opioid-sparing effects of diclofenac and paracetamol lead to improved outcomes after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(6):742–747. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.08.012.
    1. Maddali MM, Kurian E, Fahr J. Extubation time, hemodynamic stability, and postoperative pain control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: an evaluation of fentanyl, remifentanil, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with propofol for perioperative and postoperative management. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(8):605–610. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.03.022.
    1. Rafiq S, Steinbruchel DA, Wanscher MJ, Andersen LW, Navne A, Lilleoer NB, Olsen PS. Multimodal analgesia versus traditional opiate based analgesia after cardiac surgery, a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-52.
    1. Forastiere E, Sofra M, Giannarelli D, Fabrizi L, Simone G. Effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine by on-Q pain relief system for postoperative pain management after open nephrectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(6):841–847. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen309.
    1. Aguirre J, Baulig B, Dora C, Ekatodramis G, Votta-Velis G, Ruland P, Borgeat A. Continuous epicapsular ropivacaine 0.3% infusion after minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study comparing continuous wound infusion with morphine patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(2):456–461. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318239dc64.
    1. Chan SK, Lai PB, Li PT, Wong J, Karmakar MK, Lee KF, Gin T. The analgesic efficacy of continuous wound instillation with ropivacaine after open hepatic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(12):1180–1186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06530.x.
    1. Dowling R, Thielmeier K, Ghaly A, Barber D, Boice T, Dine A. Improved pain control after cardiac surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1271–1278. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00585-3.
    1. White PF, Rawal S, Latham P, Markowitz S, Issioui T, Chi L, Dellaria S, Shi C, Morse L, Ing C. Use of a continuous local anesthetic infusion for pain management after median sternotomy. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(4):918–923. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200310000-00026.
    1. Magnano D, Montalbano R, Lamarra M, Ferri F, Lorini L, Clarizia S, Rescigno G. Ineffectiveness of local wound anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain after median sternotomy. J Card Surg. 2005;20(4):314–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.200318.x.
    1. Amour J, Cholley B, Ouattara A, Longrois D, Leprince P, Fellahi JL, Riou B, Hariri S, Latremouille C, Remy A, et al. The effect of local anesthetic continuous wound infusion for the prevention of postoperative pneumonia after on-pump cardiac surgery with sternotomy: the STERNOCAT randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(1):33–43. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5497-x.
    1. Hinrichs M, Weyland A. Bantel C: [Piritramide : A critical review] Schmerz. 2017;31(4):345–352. doi: 10.1007/s00482-017-0197-y.
    1. Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkula M, Blomberg S, Sjovall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):507–514. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.507.
    1. Peters ML, Sommer M, de Rijke JM, Kessels F, Heineman E, Patijn J, Marcus MA, Vlaeyen JW, van Kleef M. Somatic and psychologic predictors of long-term unfavorable outcome after surgical intervention. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):487–494. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245495.79781.65.
    1. Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, Rollin M, Parc Y, Mazoit JX, Azizi L, Gervaz P, Rohr S, Biermann C, et al. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(3):461–468. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19.
    1. Shepherd SJ, Klein AA, Martinez G. Enhanced recovery for thoracic surgery in the elderly. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(1):30–38. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000537.
    1. Hoenecke HR, Jr, Pulido PA, Morris BA, Fronek J. The efficacy of continuous bupivacaine infiltration following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(8):854–858. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.36139.
    1. Kushner DM, LaGalbo R, Connor JP, Chappell R, Stewart SL, Hartenbach EM. Use of a bupivacaine continuous wound infusion system in gynecologic oncology: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(2):227–233. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Florkiewicz P, Musialowicz T, Hippelainen M, Lahtinen P. Continuous Ropivacaine infusion offers no benefit in treating postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(2):378–384. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.09.006.
    1. Eljezi V, Imhoff E, Bourdeaux D, Pereira B, Farhat M, Schoeffler P, Azarnoush K, Duale C. Bilateral sternal infusion of ropivacaine and length of stay in ICU after cardiac surgery with increased respiratory risk: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(2):56–65. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000564.
    1. Glauber M, Gilmanov D, Farneti PA, Kallushi E, Miceli A, Chiaramonti F, Murzi M, Solinas M: Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015, 150(3):548–556.e542.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner