- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03079830
Postoperative Pain Management After Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery (PPMAMIAVS)
Efficacy of Ropivacaine Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management After Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery
The study evaluates the efficacy of local anesthestic application through the catheter in the surgical wound for the postoperative pain relief after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. The patients will be enrolled in two different groups according to the protocol of the local anesthetic and saline administration:
- group: continous infusion of the local anesthetic plus bolus on demand
- group: continous infusion of saline plus bolus on demand For all patients metamizol every 12 hours plus bolous of piritramid on demand.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacment surgery will be enroled in the study, after giving a signed informed consent.
The study evaluates the efficacy of local anesthestic application through the catheter in the surgical wound for the postoperative pain relief after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.
Patients will then be randomised in two groups according to the protocol:
- group: continous infusion of the local anesthetic plus bolus on demand
- group: continous infusion of saline plus bolus on demand
All patients will receive Metamizol every 12 hours plus bolus of piritramid on demand.
Analgesia effectivness will be checked hourly according to the visual analogue scale (VAS). According to protocol, bolus will be given every time the score of VAS scale is >3.
The catheter will be removed 48 hours after the protocols' start.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
- University Clinical Center Ljubljana
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery
- Patients agreement with the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years
- Allergy to local anesthetic
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ropivacaine continous infusion
Piritramid
|
Piritramid will be administered i.v., if the patients feel pain after receiving a bolus of Ropivacaine or saline through the catheter.
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Saline continous
Piritramid
|
Piritramid will be administered i.v., if the patients feel pain after receiving a bolus of Ropivacaine or saline through the catheter.
Other Names:
Piritramid will be administered i.v., if the patients feel pain after receiving a bolus of Ropivacaine or saline through the catheter.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of cumulative postoperative dose of Piritramid between the two different protocols, using VAS scale to determine level of analgesia.
Time Frame: 48 hours after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU)
|
Comparison of cumulative postoperative dose of Piritramid between the two protocols
|
48 hours after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications related to the catheter in the surgical wound
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
|
Complications related to the catheter in the surgical wound
|
Up to 30 days
|
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS), frequency of scores higher than 3
Time Frame: 48 hours after admission to the ICU
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS), frequency of scores higher than 3
|
48 hours after admission to the ICU
|
|
Patients satisfaction with pain relief measured by Likert-type Patient satisfaction scale
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
|
Patients satisfaction regarding pain relief, in the following order 1.very satisfied 2.satisfied 3.neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 4.dissatisfied 5.completely dissatisfied
|
72 hours after surgery
|
|
Rate of complications related to the local anesthetic
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
|
Neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity related to the local anesthetic
|
72 hours after surgery
|
|
Hospital lenght of stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
|
Hospital lenght of stay
|
Up to 30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Maja Sostaric, PhD, Clinical department of anesthesiology and intensive care
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KVIT2016
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Surgery
-
Maria Cecilia HospitalEttore Sansavini Health Science FoundationCompletedAortic Valve SurgeryItaly
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of SheffieldCompletedAortic Valve SurgeryUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompletedAortic Valve SurgerySwitzerland
-
Braile Biomedica Ind. Com. e Repr. Ltda.CompletedMitral Valve Regurgitation | Aortic Valve Surgery | Mitral Valve Surgery | AORTIC VALVE DISEASES | Aortic Valve Stenosis and InsufficiencyBrazil
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedAortic Valve Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery | Mitral Valve Surgery | Myocardial Revascularization Surgery With Extracorporeal CirculationBrazil
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensRecruitingMortality | Cardiac Surgery | Echocardiography | Aortic ValveFrance
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiCompletedCardiac Surgery | Aortic Valve Surgery | Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)Greece
-
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria MiddelaresCompletedAortic Valve Replacement | Mitral Valve Surgery | Minimal Invasive Cardiac Surgery | Minimal Invasive Direct Coronary Artery BypassBelgium
-
Yale UniversityCompletedCoronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery | Aortic Valve ReplacementUnited States
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesEnrolling by invitationInflammation | Aortic Stenosis | Computed Tomography | Inflammatory Response During Cardiac Surgery | TAVI(Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation)Poland, Italy, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Piritramid
-
The Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine...University Hospital Ostrava; Tomas Bata Hospital, Czech Republic; General University... and other collaboratorsCompletedInfluence of Opioid Analgesia on Circulating Tumor Cells in Open Colorectal Cancer Surgery (POACC-1)Colorectal Cancer | Circulating Tumor CellCzechia
-
The Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine...University Hospital Ostrava; Tomas Bata Hospital, Czech Republic; General University... and other collaboratorsCompletedColorectal Cancer | Circulating Tumor CellCzechia
-
Max DieterichUniversity of RostockCompleted
-
Technische Universität DresdenCompletedPatients Undergoing Puncture of the Bone MarrowGermany