Soluble ST2 concentrations associate with in-hospital mortality and need for mechanical ventilation in unselected patients with COVID-19

Torbjorn Omland, Christian Prebensen, Christine Jonassen, My Svensson, Jan Erik Berdal, Ingebjørg Seljeflot, Peder Langeland Myhre, Torbjorn Omland, Christian Prebensen, Christine Jonassen, My Svensson, Jan Erik Berdal, Ingebjørg Seljeflot, Peder Langeland Myhre

Abstract

Objective: Soluble ST2 (sST2) reflects inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis, is produced in the lungs and is an established biomarker in heart failure. We sought to determine the role of sST2 in COVID-19 by assessing pathophysiological correlates and its association to in-hospital outcomes.

Methods: We enrolled 123 consecutive, hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in the prospective, observational COVID-19 MECH study. Biobank samples were collected at baseline, day 3 and day 9. The key exposure variable was sST2, and the outcome was ICU treatment with mechanical ventilation or in-hospital death.

Results: Concentrations of sST2 at baseline was median 48 (IQR 37-67) ng/mL, and 74% had elevated concentrations (>37.9 ng/mL). Higher baseline sST2 concentrations were associated with older age, male sex, white race, smoking, diabetes, hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Baseline sST2 also associated with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viraemia, lower oxygen saturation, higher respiratory rate and increasing concentrations of biomarkers reflecting inflammation, thrombosis and cardiovascular disease. During the hospitalisation, 8 (7%) patients died and 27 (22%) survivors received intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. Baseline sST2 concentrations demonstrated a graded association with disease severity (median, IQR): medical ward 43 (36-59) ng/mL; ICU 67 (39-104) ng/mL and non-survivors 107 (72-116) ng/mL (p<0.001 for all comparisons). These associations persisted at day 3 and day 9 .

Conclusions: sST2 concentrations associate with SARS-CoV-2 viraemia, hypoxaemia and concentrations of inflammatory and cardiovascular biomarkers. There was a robust association between baseline sST2 and disease severity that was independent of, and superior to, established risk factors. sST2 reflects key pathophysiology and may be a promising biomarker in COVID-19.

Trial registration number: NCT04314232.

Keywords: COVID-19; biomarkers; risk factors.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: TO has served on advisory boards for Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics and Bayer and has received research support from Abbott Diagnostics, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Singulex and SomaLogic via Akershus University Hospital, and speaker’s or consulting honoraria from Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers and CardiNor. PLM has served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Novo Nordisk and has received consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, AmGen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Novo Nordisk.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concentrations of soluble ST2 at baseline, day 3 and day 9 in hospitalised COVID-19 patients treated at the medical ward, ICU and in non-survivors. Bars represent median concentration and whiskers quartile 1 and quartile 3. P value is for comparison of concentrations in patients treated in the ICU or non-survivors to patients treated in the medical ward, after adjustment for age, sex, race, cardiovascular disease, body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate. ICU, intensive care unit.

References

    1. Abate SM, Ahmed Ali S, Mantfardo B, et al. . Rate of intensive care unit admission and outcomes among patients with coronavirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0235653. 10.1371/journal.pone.0235653
    1. Nishiga M, Wang DW, Han Y, et al. . COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17:543–58. 10.1038/s41569-020-0413-9
    1. Altara R, Ghali R, Mallat Z, et al. . Conflicting vascular and metabolic impact of the IL-33/sST2 axis. Cardiovasc Res 2018;114:1578–94. 10.1093/cvr/cvy166
    1. Januzzi JL, Pascual-Figal D, Daniels LB. St2 testing for chronic heart failure therapy monitoring: the International ST2 consensus panel. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:70B–5. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.044
    1. Pascual-Figal DA, Pérez-Martínez MT, Asensio-Lopez MC, et al. . Pulmonary production of soluble ST2 in heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e005488. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005488
    1. van Vark LC, Lesman-Leegte I, Baart SJ, et al. . Prognostic value of serial ST2 measurements in patients with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2378–88. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.026
    1. Broch K, Ueland T, Nymo SH, et al. . Soluble ST2 is associated with adverse outcome in patients with heart failure of ischaemic aetiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:268–77. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs006
    1. Jenkins WS, Roger VL, Jaffe AS, et al. . Prognostic value of soluble ST2 after myocardial infarction: a community perspective. Am J Med 2017;130:1112.e9–5. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.034
    1. Gaggin HK, Szymonifka J, Bhardwaj A, et al. . Head-To-Head comparison of serial soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and highly-sensitive troponin T measurements in patients with chronic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2014;2:65–72. 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.10.005
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. . 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure Society of America. Circulation 2017;136:e137–61. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509
    1. Hoogerwerf JJ, Tanck MWT, van Zoelen MAD, et al. . Soluble ST2 plasma concentrations predict mortality in severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:630–7. 10.1007/s00134-010-1773-0
    1. Rudolf JW, Lewandrowski EL, Lewandrowski KB, et al. . St2 predicts mortality and length of stay in a critically ill noncardiac intensive care unit population. Am J Clin Pathol 2016;145:203–10. 10.1093/ajcp/aqv082
    1. Bajwa EK, Volk JA, Christiani DC, et al. . Prognostic and diagnostic value of plasma soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentrations in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2013;41:2521–31. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182978f91
    1. Alladina JW, Levy SD, Hibbert KA, et al. . Plasma concentrations of soluble suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 and interleukin-6 are predictive of successful liberation from mechanical ventilation in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2016;44:1735–43. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001814
    1. Myhre PL, Prebensen C, Strand H, et al. . Growth differentiation factor 15 provides prognostic information superior to established cardiovascular and inflammatory biomarkers in unselected patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Circulation 2020;142:2128–37. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050360
    1. Prebensen C, Myhre PL, Jonassen C, et al. . Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA in plasma is associated with intensive care unit admission and mortality in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73:e799–802. 10.1093/cid/ciaa1338
    1. Critical Diagnostics . Instructions for use manual for the presage ELISA assay. Available:
    1. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med 1985;4:87–90. 10.1002/sim.4780040112
    1. Huang J. Comparing biomarkers for COVID-19 disease with commonly associated preexisting conditions and complications. medRxiv 2020:2020.10.02.20205609.
    1. Miftode R-S, Petriș AO, Onofrei Aursulesei V, et al. . The novel perspectives opened by ST2 in the pandemic: a review of its role in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with heart failure and COVID-19. Diagnostics 2021;11:175. 10.3390/diagnostics11020175
    1. Zeng Z, Hong X-Y, Li Y, et al. . Serum-Soluble ST2 as a novel biomarker reflecting inflammatory status and illness severity in patients with COVID-19. Biomark Med 2020;14:1619–29. 10.2217/bmm-2020-0410
    1. Han L, Zhang M, Liang X, et al. . Interleukin-33 promotes inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis via ST2/TRAF6-mediated Akt/eNOS/NO signalling pathway. Sci Rep 2017;7:10602. 10.1038/s41598-017-10894-x
    1. Cao K, Liao X, Lu J, et al. . IL-33/ST2 plays a critical role in endothelial cell activation and microglia-mediated neuroinflammation modulation. J Neuroinflammation 2018;15:136. 10.1186/s12974-018-1169-6
    1. Nagashima S, Mendes MC, Camargo Martins AP, et al. . Endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19-Brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020;40:2404–7. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314860

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner