Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Exploring the Long-term Effects of Cognitive Exercise on Cognition After Stroke

17. September 2015 aktualisiert von: Nova Scotia Health Authority
This project will investigate the effectiveness of an intensive and focused working memory training program for chronic stroke patients. The investigators hypothesize that working memory training will be an effective method of improving working memory and related cognitive and behavioural functions in this population.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Vascular cognitive impairment due to vascular disease and stroke frequently includes problems with attention, working memory and executive functions (e.g., monitoring, planning, and organization).

These deficits are common - 32-73%, and chronic, and interfere with a patients response to rehabilitation, independence in activities of daily living, community re-integration, and overall quality of life after stroke. Attention, memory and executive function impairments can adversely affect the ability to relearn various skills.

Cognitive impairments and their impacts on other components of functioning not only impact on the individual, but can also adversely affect the family via increases in caregiver distress and burden. Thus, the presence of cognitive impairment has wide-reaching impact and deserves effective and consistent intervention similar to the attention devoted to improving function in physical domains.

Cognitive training can improve cognitive function, particularly in those areas known to involved in vascular cognitive impairment, i.e., attentional and executive function. Accumulating evidence indicates that computer-based training can improve cognitive skills in healthy older adults as well as in clinical populations. Attention and working memory training has also been shown to be effective in patients in the chronic phase post stroke.

The investigators propose that specific cognitive training to improve working memory could provide direct benefit to chronic stroke patients. Promising interventions focused on intensive and direct working memory training are emerging and have been shown to generalize to other cognitive domains, such as fluid intelligence.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

2

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Kanada, B3H 4R2
        • Dalhousie University

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must: (i) be ≥18 years of age, (ii) have been received the diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >6 months ago, (iii) be experiencing stroke-related cognitive problems that interfere with daily functioning, (iv) be able to perform a two-step command, (v) live within a 75 km radius of the Queen Elizabeth II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must not: (i) have moderate or severe receptive aphasia, (ii) have a terminal illness, life-threatening co-morbidity or concomitant neurological or psychiatric illness.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Vervierfachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Variable Structured Cognitive Exercise
This training group will consist of 10 randomly assigned participants who will begin the adaptive working memory training task immediately after baseline assessment. Each participant will receive 30 minutes of cognitive exercise per day, 3 days a week for 10 weeks.
This exercise uses the n-back paradigm in which participants are asked to keep track of one or two series of sequentially presented auditory and/or visual stimuli in order to detect targets that match those presented n-items ago in the sequence. The task begins at 1-back (i.e., watch for targets that match those just presented) and gets harder (e.g., watch for matches with items presented 2 or 3 items ago in the sequence) as performance improves. The stimuli will vary weekly, and include varying auditory letters or words, or varying visual patterns or faces.
Experimental: Constant Structured Cognitive Exercise
This training group will consist of 10 randomly assigned participants who will begin the adaptive working memory training task immediately after baseline assessment. Each participant will receive 30 minutes of cognitive exercise per day, 3 days a week for 10 weeks.
This exercise uses the n-back paradigm in which participants are asked to keep track of one or two series of sequentially presented auditory and/or visual stimuli in order to detect targets that match those presented n-items ago in the sequence. The task begins at 1-back (i.e., watch for targets that match those just presented) and gets harder (e.g., watch for matches with items presented 2 or 3 items ago in the sequence) as performance improves. The stimuli will remain constant throughout the 10 week intervention

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change from Baseline Flanker Effects at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Flanker test [primary study outcome] is a computerized test of selective attention and reaction time that involves a motor response. The participant needs to focus and identify an item presented on a screen while ignoring task-irrelevant distracters. Performance on this test has been shown to improve with exercise
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change from Baseline Raven's Matrices Scores at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Raven's Matrices Test is a measure of non-verbal reasoning ability and fluid intelligence (i.e., ability to solve new problems independently of previously acquired knowledge, which is critical to learning). This test will examine the far transfer of training to a problem-solving task. Dual n-back training has shown to improve performance on this test.
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Change from Baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scores at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a well-known screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. This test is a measure of overall cognitive abilities.
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Change from Baseline Networks of Attention Battery scores at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Networks of Attention battery is a computerized battery that provides performance data on tests of vigilance (simple and choice reaction time), orienting and selection (visual search) and executive control (dual tasking, working memory, inhibition). This battery will allow the attention and working memory deficits to be characterized for each patient and serve as near and far transfer measures of training effects.
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Change from Baseline Sternberg Digit Memory scores at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Sternberg digit memory task is a measure of visual working memory wherein the subject is shown a set of n digits for study. After a short delay, a digit is shown and the subject is asked to recall whether that item was in the previously viewed set. This test will examine the near transfer of training to another working memory test.
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Change from Baseline Cognitive Failures Questionnaire Scores at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire is a measure of self-reported deficits in completing simple everyday tasks due to failures in attention, memory, perception, and motor function, for example, "Do you find you forget why you went from one part of the house to the other?" It has high internal validity (alpha=0.91) and good test-retest reliability (r= 0.82).
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Change from Baseline Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) consists of 14 items, divided into two 7-item subscales (Anxiety and Depression). HADS has been reported to be an 'acceptable' screening tool for anxiety and depression after stroke.
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Cognitive Activities Questionnaire and the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed during the duration of the study, an expected average of 10 weeks
Cognitive Activities Questionnaire and the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) will be conducted to determine the extent of cognitive and physical activities, respectively, during the 10-week interval.
Participants will be assessed during the duration of the study, an expected average of 10 weeks

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
The Fatigue Severity Scale
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed during the duration of the study, an expected average of 10 weeks
The Fatigue Severity Scale is a brief 9-item questionnaire designed to assess patient fatigue. This scale is commonly used for the stroke population.
Participants will be assessed during the duration of the study, an expected average of 10 weeks
Participant Satisfaction
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed during the duration of the study, an expected average of 10 weeks
Participants will be asked a set of structured questions about their response to the training itself - difficulty, enjoyability, response to using a computer, etc.
Participants will be assessed during the duration of the study, an expected average of 10 weeks
Change from Baseline Event Related Potentials using Cortical Activity Electroencephalography at 10 weeks
Zeitfenster: The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10
Cortical activity Electroencephalography technology will be used to measure cortical activity. Stimulus presentation and participant response on the computerized Flanker test will be synchronized with EEG data acquisition. Numeric 'triggers' will be placed on the continuous EEG waveform corresponding to stimulus presentation and participant response. Data synchronization is necessary to perform event related potential (ERP) analysis to obtain the P3 component. 150 trials (~5.5 seconds per trial) will be processed using a "SynAmps" response time 128 channel EEG system from 18 scalp electrodes at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz for a total EEG data collection time of ~20 minutes. Electrodes around the eyes will allow detection and removal of trials with ocular artifacts.
The participants will be assessed on session 1 of week 1 and on session 31 of week 10

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Graham C Wilson, BSc, Dalhousie University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. September 2013

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. November 2014

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. November 2014

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

3. September 2013

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

20. September 2013

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

23. September 2013

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

18. September 2015

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

17. September 2015

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2013

Mehr Informationen

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

3
Abonnieren