Ultraschall zur Unterstützung von Behandlungsentscheidungen bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis nach einem T2T-Ansatz (US-RA-T2T)
Population
Patients with a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), moderate or high clinical disease activity (CDAI>10) despite conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD(s) or bs-ts-DMARDs therapy for ≥3 months, and a maximum of 2 swollen joints (out of 44 joints)
Study design
Randomised multicentre, parallel-arm clinical study
Primary objective
Non-inferiority of the experimental arm (i.e. clinical therapy together with ultrasound guided treatment decision) in comparison to the control arm (clinically guided decision) concerning the proportion of patients reaching low disease activity (CDAI ≤10) and a minimal clinical important improvement (MCII: improvement of ≥6 points if starting from moderate disease activity, any case starting from high disease activity and achieving low disease activity) or remission according to ACR/EULAR index-based remission criteria (CDAI ≤2.8/Boolean remission) at week 24.
Intervention
This is a randomised multicentre, national, parallel-arm clinical study. Patients with a diagnosis of RA, moderate or high clinical disease activity (CDAI>10) despite conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD(s) or b-tsDMARDs therapy for ≥3 months, and a maximum of 2 swollen joints (out of 44 joints) will be included and randomized to one of the following two strategic arms:
- Clinical decision strategy: All patients receive a new course of b-ts-DMARDs, with or without concomitant cDMARD. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use at week 12 is at the discretion of the investigator.
- Clinical plus ultrasound-based decision strategy. All patients in this group will be evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case of clinically-verified plus ultrasound verified inflammation, patients will receive a new b-ts-DMARD while continuing or not background csDMARD(s) therapy. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are again evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is present, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use is at the discretion of the investigator. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is absent, patients receive step-up pain therapy while background treatment will be continued.
Sample size
158 patients
Time plan
- Total duration of the study: 72 months
- Active phase for each patient: 48 weeks (24 weeks for the interventional treatment strategy and 24 weeks for follow-up visit)
- Recruitment: 60 months
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Christian Dejaco, MD, PhD
- Telefonnummer: +390474581862
- E-Mail: Christian.Dejaco@sabes.it
Studienorte
-
-
Bolzano
-
Bruneck, Bolzano, Italien, 39031
- Rekrutierung
- Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige
-
Kontakt:
- Christian Dejaco, MD, PhD
- Telefonnummer: +390474581862
- E-Mail: Christian.Dejaco@sabes.it
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Classification of RA according to the ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria
- Age of the patients: 18 to 84 years
- Patients with moderate or high disease activity according to CDAI (>10)
- Maximum of 2 clinically swollen joints out of a 44-joint count
- Current stable treatment with a single csDMARD or bDMARD or tsDMARD for at least 3 months
- No glucocorticoid therapy or stable glucocorticoid dose for at least 4 weeks and at a maximum dose of 5 mg/day prednisone equivalent.
- No corticosteroid intraarticular injection within 4 weeks
- Stable or absent dose of NSAIDs for at least 1 week
- Patients able and willing to give written informed consent and compliant with the requirements of the study protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- Complete (clinically evident) destruction of any joint to be investigated by ultrasound as judged by the physician
- Current RA-related vasculitis or other active systemic (i.e. extraarticular) RA-manifestation except for rheumatoid nodules, which in the opinion of the investigator would expose the study subject to a high risk of morbidity or mortality
- Initial arthritis manifestations before the age of 18 years
- Planned surgery within the study period for any of the joints investigated either clinically or by sonography
- Current severe medical illness requiring hospitalization
- Active infection or active malignancy at screening <5 years
- Any contraindication to b/ts DMARDs according to the "Summary of Product Characteristics"
- Pregnancy or lactation
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Verdreifachen
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Kein Eingriff: Conventional decision strategy
All patients receive a new course of b-ts-DMARDs, with or without concomitant cDMARD. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use at week 12 is at the discretion of the investigator. |
|
|
Experimental: Clinical plus ultrasound-based decision strategy
All patients in this group will be evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case of clinically-verified plus ultrasound verified inflammation, patients will receive a new b-ts-DMARD while continuing or not background csDMARD(s) therapy. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are again evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is present, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use is at the discretion of the investigator. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is absent, patients receive step-up pain therapy while background treatment will be continued. |
At baseline and at weeks 12, 24 and 48, patients will undergo an ultrasound examination of 44 joints by one investigator, who is blinded to the strategic arm and all clinical data. The following joints will be assessed: bilateral wrists (distal radio-ulnar joint, radio-carpal, mid-carpal recesses), 1st - 5th MCP, 1st - 5th PIP, elbows, glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, knees, ankles and 1st - 5th MTP. At wrists, MCP and PIP joints, palmar and dorsal sites including synovial recess, extensor and flexor tendons will be investigated whereas at feet the dorsal site (plus the lateral aspects of MTP5) including synovial recess and extensor tendons will be evaluated. Further, we will assess the following: at elbows the dorsal and anterior recess, at shoulders the dorsal recess, at knees the suprapatellar as well as the medial and lateral femoro-tibial recess and at ankles the anterior, lateral and medial recess of the tibiotalar joint. |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Non-inferiority of ultrasound-based decision strategy compared to clinically-based strategy.
Zeitfenster: 24 weeks
|
Non-inferiority of the experimental arm (i.e. clinical plus ultrasound-guided treatment decision) in comparison to the control arm (clinically-guided decision) concerning the proportion of patients reaching low disease activity (CDAI ≤10) and a minimal clinical important improvement (MCII: improvement of ≥6 points if starting from moderate disease activity, any case achieving low disease activity who started from high disease activity) [19] or remission according to ACR/EULAR index-based remission criteria (CDAI ≤2.8/Boolean remission) at week 24. |
24 weeks
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Vergleich des Anteils der Patienten mit niedriger Krankheitsaktivität und MCII oder Remission gemäß ACR/EULAR-Index-basierten Remissionskriterien in Woche 12 und 48
Zeitfenster: 12 und 48 Wochen
|
12 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich des Anteils der Patienten in Remission gemäß ACR/EULAR-Index-basierten Remissionskriterien (CDAI ≤2,8/boolesche Remission) in Woche 12, 24 und 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich des Anteils der Patienten in Remission nach DAS-28 (DAS-28 ≤ 2,6) oder SDAI (≤ 3,3) in Woche 12, 24 und 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich des Wertes der empfindlichen Gelenke in den Wochen 12, 24 und 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich der Werte geschwollener Gelenke in den Wochen 12, 24 und 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich der Werte der Erythrozytensedimentationsrate (ESR) in den Wochen 12, 24 und 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich der Werte des C-reaktiven Proteins (CRP) in Woche 12, 24 und 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich der Ergebnisse der EuroQol-5-Dimensionen (EQ5D) in Woche 24 und 48
Zeitfenster: 24 und 48 Wochen
|
24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Vergleich von Patienten, die in den Wochen 12, 24 und 48 einen PD-Score von ≤ 1 (44 Gelenke) erreichten
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
12, 24 und 48 Wochen
|
|
|
Comparison of value of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain at weeks 12, 24 and 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
Range: 0, better outcome - 100, worse outcome |
12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of value of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at weeks 12, 24 and 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
Range: 0, better outcome - 100, worse outcome |
12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of value of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at weeks 12, 24 and 48
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
Range: 0, better outcome - 100, worse outcome |
12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score at week 24 and 48
Zeitfenster: 24 and 48 weeks
|
Range: 0, better outcome - 3, worse outcome |
24 and 48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score at week 24 and 48
Zeitfenster: 24 and 48 weeks
|
Range: 0, better outcome - 10, worse outcome |
24 and 48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) score at week 24 and 48
Zeitfenster: 24 and 48 weeks
|
Range: 10, better outcome - 50, worse outcome |
24 and 48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of the trend of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain across all study visits
Zeitfenster: 48 weeks
|
Absolute and relative change of parameter with respect to the baseline and between different visits |
48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of the trend of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity across all study visits
Zeitfenster: 48 weeks
|
Absolute and relative change of parameter with respect to the baseline and between different visits |
48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of the trend of Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score across all study visits
Zeitfenster: 48 weeks
|
Absolute and relative change of score with respect to the baseline and between different visits |
48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of the trend of Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score across all study visits
Zeitfenster: 48 weeks
|
Absolute and relative change of score with respect to the baseline and between different visits |
48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of the trend of Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) score across all study visits
Zeitfenster: 48 weeks
|
Absolute and relative change of score with respect to the baseline and between different visits |
48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of the trend of EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ5D) score across all study visits
Zeitfenster: 48 weeks
|
Absolute and relative change of score with respect to the baseline and between different visits |
48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of the differences in the Sharp van der Heijde Score from baseline to week 48
Zeitfenster: 48 weeks
|
Range: 0, better outcome - 448, worse outcome |
48 weeks
|
|
Comparison of direct medical costs of treatment arms from baseline to week 24 and 48
Zeitfenster: 24 and 48 weeks
|
Measurement: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) |
24 and 48 weeks
|
|
Analysis regarding predictors of low disease activity or remission at 12, 24 and 48 weeks in patients treated with ≥1bDMARD as compared to those who receive pain therapy
Zeitfenster: 12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
Investigated predictors: baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate, baseline C reactive protein, baseline ultrasound score (EULAR-OMERACT combined score) |
12, 24 and 48 weeks
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- US-RA-T2T
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .