A randomized controlled trial of motor imagery combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy on gait in stroke survivors

Sunee Bovonsunthonchai, Nilar Aung, Vimonwan Hiengkaew, Jarugool Tretriluxana, Sunee Bovonsunthonchai, Nilar Aung, Vimonwan Hiengkaew, Jarugool Tretriluxana

Abstract

Structured Progressive Circuit Class Therapy (SPCCT) was developed based on task-oriented therapy, providing benefits to patients' motivation and motor function. Training with Motor Imagery (MI) alone can improve gait performance in stroke survivors, but a greater effect may be observed when combined with SPCCT. Health education (HE) is a basic component of stroke rehabilitation and can reduce depression and emotional distress. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effect of MI with SPCCT against HE with SPCCT on gait in stroke survivors. Two hundred and ninety stroke survivors from 3 hospitals in Yangon, Myanmar enrolled in the study. Of these, 40 stroke survivors who passed the selection criteria were randomized into an experimental (n = 20) or control (n = 20) group. The experimental group received MI training whereas the control group received HE for 25 minutes prior to having the same 65 minutes SPCCT program, with both groups receiving training 3 times a week over 4 weeks. Temporo-spatial gait variables and lower limb muscle strength of the affected side were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after intervention. After 4 weeks of training, the experimental group showed greater improvement than the control group in all temporospatial gait variables, except for the unaffected step length and step time symmetry which showed no difference. In addition, greater improvements of the affected hip flexor and knee extensor muscle strength were found in the experimental group. In conclusion, a combination of MI with SPCCT provided a greater therapeutic effect on gait and lower limb muscle strengths in stroke survivors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart diagram of the study.

References

    1. Billinger SA, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2532–2553. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022.
    1. Thrift AG, et al. Global stroke statistics. International Journal of Stroke. 2017;12:13–32. doi: 10.1177/1747493016676285.
    1. Russo T, Felzani G, Marini C. Stroke in the very old: a systematic review of studies on incidence, outcome, and resource use. Journal of Aging Research. 2011;2011:108785. doi: 10.4061/2011/108785.
    1. Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. The Lancet Neurology. 2007;6:182–187. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70031-5.
    1. Lindquist AR, et al. Gait training combining partial body-weight support, a treadmill, and functional electrical stimulation: effects on poststroke gait. Physical Therapy. 2007;87:1144–1154. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050384.
    1. Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C, Clark BM. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1983;64:583–587.
    1. Patterson KK, et al. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2008;89:304–310. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.142.
    1. Jørgensen L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J, Jacobsen BK. Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading. Bone. 2000;27:701–707. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00374-4.
    1. Mentiplay BF, et al. Gait velocity and joint power generation after stroke: contribution of strength and balance. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2018 doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001122.
    1. Batchelor FA, Mackintosh SF, Said CM, Hill KD. Falls after stroke. International Journal of Stroke. 2012;7:482–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00796.x.
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5.
    1. Yang YR, Wang RY, Lin KH, Chu MY, Chan RC. Task-oriented progressive resistance strength training improves muscle strength and functional performance in individuals with stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006;20:860–870. doi: 10.1177/0269215506070701.
    1. Macko RF, Ivey FM, Forrester LW. Task-oriented aerobic exercise in chronic hemiparetic stroke: training protocols and treatment effects. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2005;12:45–57. doi: 10.1310/pjqn-kan9-ttvy-hyqh.
    1. Verma R, Narayan Arya K, Garg R, Singh T. Task-oriented circuit class training program with motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in poststroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2011;18:620–632. doi: 10.1310/tsr18s01-620.
    1. Winstein, C. J. & Wolf, S. L. In Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation (ed. Stein, j.) 267-290 (Demos Medical 2009).
    1. English, C. & Hillier, S. L. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cd007513, 10.1002/14651858.CD007513.pub2 (2010).
    1. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, Dumas F, Doyon J. Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: a PET study. Human Brain Mapping. 2003;19:47–62. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10103.
    1. Guillot A, et al. Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping. 2009;30:2157–2172. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20658.
    1. Wu AJ, Hermann V, Ying J, Page SJ. The timing of mentally versus physically practiced affected arm movements in stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2010;64:929–934. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09005.
    1. Dunsky A, Dickstein R, Marcovitz E, Levy S, Deutsch JE. Home-based motor imagery training for gait rehabilitation of people with chronic poststroke hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2008;89:1580–1588. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.039.
    1. Kim JS, Oh DW, Kim SY, Choi JD. Visual and kinesthetic locomotor imagery training integrated with auditory step rhythm for walking performance of patients with chronic stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2011;25:134–145. doi: 10.1177/0269215510380822.
    1. García CD, Aboitiz CJ. Effectiveness of motor imagery or mental practice in functional recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurologia. 2016;31:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2013.02.003.
    1. Bajaj S, Butler AJ, Drake D, Dhamala M. Functional organization and restoration of the brain motor-execution network after stroke and rehabilitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015;9:173. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00173.
    1. Schuster C, et al. Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines. BMC Medicine. 2011;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-75.
    1. Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Schuster C, Puhan MA, Siekierka E, Steurer J. Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2008;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-8.
    1. Rudd AG, Bowen A, Young GR, James MA. The latest national clinical guideline for stroke. Clin Med (Lond) 2017;17:154–155. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-154.
    1. Jolliffe L, Lannin NA, Cadilhac DA, Hoffmann T. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e018791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791.
    1. Doig, G. S. & Simpson, F. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. Journal of Critical Care 20, 187-191; discussion 191-183, 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.04.005 (2005).
    1. Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Liu JZ, Sahgal V, Yue GH. From mental power to muscle power–gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:944–956. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.018.
    1. Fusi S, et al. Cardioventilatory responses during real or imagined walking at low speed. Archives Italiennes de Biologie. 2005;143:223–228.
    1. Aung, N. et al. Concurrent validity and intratester reliability of the video-based system for measuring gait poststroke. Physiotherapy Research International, e1803, 10.1002/pri.1803 (2019).
    1. Kolber MJ, Cleland JA. Strength testing using hand-held dynamometry. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2005;10:99–112. doi: 10.1179/108331905X55730.
    1. Bandinelli S, et al. Measuring muscular strength of the lower limbs by hand-held dynamometer: a standard protocol. Aging (Milano) 1999;11:287–293. doi: 10.1007/bf03339802.
    1. Sakurada T, Nakajima T, Morita M, Hirai M, Watanabe E. Improved motor performance in patients with acute stroke using the optimal individual attentional strategy. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:40592. doi: 10.1038/srep40592.
    1. Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Variability in spatiotemporal step characteristics and its relationship to walking performance post-stroke. Gait & Posture. 2009;29:408–414. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.10.061.
    1. Lin PY, Yang YR, Cheng SJ, Wang RY. The relation between ankle impairments and gait velocity and symmetry in people with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2006;87:562–568. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.12.042.
    1. Hsu AL, Tang PF, Jan MH. Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;84:1185–1193. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00030-3.
    1. Kumar VK, Chakrapani M, Kedambadi R. Motor imagery training on muscle strength and gait performance in ambulant stroke subjects-A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016;10:YC01–04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16254.7358.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, et al. How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018;52:776–788. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097628.
    1. Olawale OA, Usman JS, Oke KI, Osundiya OC. Evaluation of predictive factors influencing community reintegration in adult patients with stroke. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2018;9:6–10. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_386_17.
    1. Lee GC, Song CH, Lee YW, Cho HY, Lee SW. Effects of motor imagery training on gait ability of patients with chronic stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2011;23:197–200. doi: 10.1589/jpts.23.197.
    1. Lebon F, Collet C, Guillot A. Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:1680–1687. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d8e936.
    1. Shumway-Cook, A. & Woollacott, M. H. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. 4th edn, 641 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012).

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren