Use sonoelastography to predict the reparability of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears

Yu-Hsuan Tseng, Wen-Yi Chou, Kuan-Ting Wu, Ching-Di Chang, Yi-Cun Chen, Yu-Chi Huang, Wei-Che Lin, Po-Cheng Chen, Yu-Hsuan Tseng, Wen-Yi Chou, Kuan-Ting Wu, Ching-Di Chang, Yi-Cun Chen, Yu-Chi Huang, Wei-Che Lin, Po-Cheng Chen

Abstract

Introduction: Most symptomatic large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) should be operated, but the surgical reparability depended on the degree of rotator cuff muscle atrophy or fatty infiltration. The orthopedic surgeons will decide whether the teared stump is reparable during the surgery, but preoperative evaluation can be done by some assessment tools. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used in recent studies to predict the reparability of large-to-massive RCTs, but the clinical availability was not as good as ultrasound. We hypothesize that the ultrasound elastography can predict the reparability of large-to-massive RCTs.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study and participants with large-to-massive RCTs who are going to have surgeries will be included. Out investigators will evaluate the shoulder passive range of motion (ROM) and strength of all participants. Participants' degree of shoulder pain and activities of daily living (ADLs) will be assessed by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. The ultrasound elastography will be used to evaluate the tissue quality of supraspinatus muscle and infraspinatus muscle. To test the reliability of the ultrasound elastography, two physicians will perform the ultrasound elastography independently and twenty participants will be selected for the reliability test. Besides, MRI will be used to evaluate the size of tear, the degree of tendon retraction, fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, and muscle atrophy. Finally, the orthopedic surgeons will perform surgeries and decide whether the teared stump can be completely repaired intraoperatively. The primary analysis is the predictive validity of ultrasound elastography for the reparability of large-to-massive RCTs. Before the predictive validity of ultrasound elastography is measured, our investigators will assess the reliability of ultrasound elastography when administered to cases with large-to-massive RCTs, and we will check the correlations between the findings of ultrasound elastography and MRI.

Discussion: The outcome will provide the evidence of ultrasound elastography for preoperative evaluation of large-to-massive RCTs. The relationships between the findings of ultrasound elastography and MRI will also be examined for further analysis.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03682679. Date of Registration: 25 September 2018, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03682679?cond=rotator+cuff&cntry=TW&draw=2&rank=1.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest, including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations, within three years of beginning the submitted work that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, the work.

Po-Cheng Chen has received research funding from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (CMRPG8H0811). The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funders have no role in the design of the study, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, or writing the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The scanning position of the participants using the ultrasound elastography. (A) The transducer position is perpendicular to the long axis of the supraspinatus muscle belly. (B) The transducer position is perpendicular to the long axis of the infraspinatus muscle belly.

References

    1. Factor D, Dale B. Current concepts of rotator cuff tendinopathy. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014;9:274–88.
    1. Harris JD, Pedroza A, Jones GL. Group MS. Predictors of pain and function in patients with symptomatic, atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a time-zero analysis of a prospective patient cohort enrolled in a structured physical therapy program. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:359–66.
    1. Harryman DT, Hettrich CM, Smith KL, et al. A prospective multipractice investigation of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears: the importance of comorbidities, practice, and other covariables on self-assessed shoulder function and health status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:690–6.
    1. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Yoo JH. Clinical outcome and repair integrity after rotator cuff repair in patients older than 70 years versus patients younger than 70 years. Arthroscopy 2014;30:546–54.
    1. Sayampanathan AA, Andrew TH. Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2017;25:1–9.
    1. Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village. J Orthop 2013;10:8–12.
    1. Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Yang JH, et al. Correlation of arthroscopic repairability of large to massive rotator cuff tears with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans. Arthroscopy 2009;25:573–82.
    1. Davidson JF, Burkhart SS, Richards DP, et al. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to predict rotator cuff tear pattern and method of repair. Arthroscopy 2005;21:1428.e1–0.
    1. Sugihara T, Nakagawa T, Tsuchiya M, et al. Prediction of primary reparability of massive tears of the rotator cuff on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:222–5.
    1. Mellado JM, Calmet J, Olona M, et al. Surgically repaired massive rotator cuff tears: MRI of tendon integrity, muscle fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy correlated with intraoperative and clinical findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1456–63.
    1. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, et al. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;78–83.
    1. Zanetti M, Gerber C, Hodler J. Quantitative assessment of the muscles of the rotator cuff with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1998;33:163–70.
    1. Patte D. Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;81–6.
    1. Kim JY, Park JS, Rhee YG. Can preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predict the reparability of massive rotator cuff tears? Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1654–63.
    1. Tse AK, Lam PH, Walton JR, et al. Ultrasound determination of rotator cuff tear repairability. Shoulder Elbow 2016;8:14–21.
    1. Rosskopf AB, Ehrmann C, Buck FM, et al. Quantitative Shear-Wave US elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: reliability of the method and relation to tendon integrity and muscle quality. Radiology 2016;278:465–74.
    1. Cofield RH, Parvizi J, Hoffmeyer PJ, et al. Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A:71–7.
    1. Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J, et al. The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2423–31.
    1. Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, et al. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;92–6.
    1. Oh JH, Kim SH, Shin SH, et al. Outcome of rotator cuff repair in large-to-massive tear with pseudoparalysis: a comparative study with propensity score matching. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:1413–20.
    1. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:587–94.
    1. Kwon DR, Park GY, Lee SU, et al. Spastic cerebral palsy in children: dynamic sonoelastographic findings of medial gastrocnemius. Radiology 2012;263:794–801.
    1. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.
    1. Iagulli ND, Field LD, Hobgood ER, et al. Comparison of partial versus complete arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1022–6.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren