Assessment of a Personal Interactive Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor in People Who Smoke Cigarettes: Single-Arm Cohort Study

Jennifer D Marler, Craig A Fujii, Kristine S Wong, Joseph A Galanko, Daniel J Balbierz, David S Utley, Jennifer D Marler, Craig A Fujii, Kristine S Wong, Joseph A Galanko, Daniel J Balbierz, David S Utley

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Existing evidence-based treatments are underutilized and have seen little recent innovation. The success of personal biofeedback interventions in other disease states portends a similar opportunity in smoking cessation. The Pivot Breath Sensor is a personal interactive FDA-cleared (over-the-counter) device that measures carbon monoxide (CO) in exhaled breath, enabling users to link their smoking behavior and CO values, and track their progress in reducing or quitting smoking.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the Pivot Breath Sensor in people who smoke cigarettes, evaluating changes in attitudes toward quitting smoking, changes in smoking behavior, and use experience.

Methods: US adults (18-80 years of age, ≥10 cigarettes per day [CPD]) were recruited online for this remote 12-week study. Participants completed a screening call, informed consent, and baseline questionnaire, and then were mailed their sensor. Participants were asked to submit 4 or more breath samples per day and complete questionnaires at 1-4, 8, and 12 weeks. Outcomes included attitudes toward quitting smoking (Stage of Change, success to quit, and perceived difficulty of quitting), smoking behavior (quit attempts, CPD reduction, and 7-, 30-day point prevalence abstinence [PPA]), and use experience (impact and learning).

Results: Participants comprised 234 smokers, mean age 39.9 (SD 11.3) years, 52.6% (123/234) female, mean CPD 20.3 (SD 8.0). The 4- and 12-week questionnaires were completed by 92.3% (216/234) and 91.9% (215/234) of participants, respectively. Concerning attitude outcomes, at baseline, 15.4% (36/234) were seriously thinking of quitting in the next 30 days, increasing to 38.9% (84/216) at 4 weeks and 47.9% (103/215) at 12 weeks (both P<.001). At 12 weeks, motivation to quit was increased in 39.1% (84/215), unchanged in 54.9% (118/215), and decreased in 6.0% (13/215; P<.001). Additional attitudes toward quitting improved from baseline to 12 weeks: success to quit 3.3 versus 5.0 (P<.001) and difficulty of quitting 2.8 versus 4.3 (P<.001). Regarding smoking behavior, at 4 weeks, 28.2% (66/234) had made 1 or more quit attempts (≥1 day of abstinence), increasing to 48.3% (113/234) at 12 weeks. At 4 weeks, 23.1% (54/234) had reduced CPD by 50% or more, increasing to 38.5% (90/234) at 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, CPD decreased by 41.1% from baseline (P<.001), and 7- and 30-day PPA were 12.0% (28/234) and 6.0% (14/234), respectively. Concerning use experience, 75.3% (171/227) reported the sensor increased their motivation to quit. More than 90% (>196/214) indicated the sensor taught them about their CO levels and smoking behavior, and 73.1% (166/227) reported that seeing their CO values made them want to quit smoking.

Conclusions: Use of the Pivot Breath Sensor resulted in a significant increase in motivation to quit, a reduction in CPD, and favorable quit attempt rates. These outcomes confer increased likelihood of quitting smoking. Accordingly, the results support a role for biofeedback via personal CO breath sampling in smoking cessation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04133064; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04133064.

Keywords: biofeedback; breath sensor; carbon monoxide; digital health; digital sensor; smartphone; smoking cessation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: JM, CF, KW, and DB are employees of Carrot Inc, the developer of the Pivot Breath Sensor used in this study. They receive salary and stock options from Carrot Inc. DU is the President and CEO of Carrot Inc and an investor in the company.

©Jennifer D Marler, Craig A Fujii, Kristine S Wong, Joseph A Galanko, Daniel J Balbierz, David S Utley. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.10.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pivot Breath Sensor and color coding of carbon monoxide values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study participant flow: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Attitudes towards quitting smoking, ratings (scale 1-10) at baseline vs. 12 weeks. Estimate of means and standard errors based on linear mixed model. Readiness to quit smoking (RTQ), Difficulty to quit smoking (DTQ), Success to quit smoking (STQ).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Participant goals at baseline and 12 weeks.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percent change in cigarettes per day (CPD) over time. Estimate of means and standard errors based on linear mixed model.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Participant Feedback: Effect of breath sensor on motivation to quit smoking (week 1).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Participant Feedback: Effect of breath sensor on number of cigarettes smoked per day (week 1).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Participant Feedback: Impact of carbon monoxide values on thoughts about quitting (week 1).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Participant Feedback: Thoughts on the Pivot Breath Sensor (week 2).
Figure 10
Figure 10
Participant Feedback: Pivot Breath Sensor’s ability to help someone quit smoking (week 2).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Participant Feedback: Has the breath sensor taught you about your carbon monoxide (CO) levels? (week 3).
Figure 12
Figure 12
Participant Feedback: Has the breath sensor taught you about your smoking behavior? (week 3).
Figure 13
Figure 13
Participant Feedback: Understanding of CO levels and trends as they relate to smoking behavior (week 4).
Figure 14
Figure 14
Breath sensor use.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Participant Feedback: Reasons for not using the breath sensor (week 12).

References

    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health . The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2014.
    1. Lortet-Tieulent J, Goding Sauer A, Siegel RL, Miller KD, Islami F, Fedewa SA, Jacobs EJ, Jemal A. State-Level Cancer Mortality Attributable to Cigarette Smoking in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 01;176(12):1792–1798. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6530.
    1. Office of the Surgeon General Health Consequences of Smoking, Surgeon General Fact Sheet. [2020-09-16]. .
    1. Creamer MR, Wang TW, Babb S, Cullen KA, Day H, Willis G, Jamal A, Neff L. Tobacco Product Use and Cessation Indicators Among Adults - United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Nov 15;68(45):1013–1019. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a2. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a2.
    1. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Tobacco Use. [2020-09-15]. .
    1. Babb S, Malarcher A, Schauer G, Asman K, Jamal A. Quitting Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2000-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jan 06;65(52):1457–1464. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6552a1. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6552a1.
    1. Jamal A, King BA, Neff LJ, Whitmill J, Babb SD, Graffunder CM. Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205–1211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
    1. Cheatham SW, Stull KR, Fantigrassi M, Motel I. The efficacy of wearable activity tracking technology as part of a weight loss program: a systematic review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Apr;58(4):534–548. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07437-0.
    1. Brickwood K, Watson G, O'Brien J, Williams AD. Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 12;7(4):e11819. doi: 10.2196/11819.
    1. Franssen WMA, Franssen GHLM, Spaas J, Solmi F, Eijnde BO. Can consumer wearable activity tracker-based interventions improve physical activity and cardiometabolic health in patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 May 11;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00955-2.
    1. George J, MacDonald T. Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. Eur Cardiol. 2015 Dec;10(2):95–101. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2015.10.2.95.
    1. Bray EP, Holder R, Mant J, McManus RJ. Does self-monitoring reduce blood pressure? Meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Medicine. 2010 May 27;42(5):371–386. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.489567.
    1. Yeh H, Brown TT, Maruthur N, Ranasinghe P, Berger Z, Suh YD, Wilson LM, Haberl EB, Brick J, Bass EB, Golden SH. Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 04;157(5):336–47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00508.
    1. Sandberg A, Sköld CM, Grunewald J, Eklund A, Wheelock M. Assessing Recent Smoking Status by Measuring Exhaled Carbon Monoxide Levels. PLoS ONE. 2011 Dec 16;6(12):e28864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028864.
    1. Abrams DB, Niaura R, Brown RA, Emmons KM, Goldstein MG, Monti PM. The Tobacco Dependence Treatment Handbook: A Guide to Best Practices. New York: Guilford Press; 2008.
    1. Beard E, West R. Pilot Study of the Use of Personal Carbon Monoxide Monitoring to Achieve Radical Smoking Reduction. J. Smok Cessat. 2012 Jul 13;7(1):12–17. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2012.1.
    1. Patrick H, Fujii CA, Glaser DB, Utley DS, Marler JD. A Comprehensive Digital Program for Smoking Cessation: Assessing Feasibility in a Single-Group Cohort Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 18;6(12):e11708. doi: 10.2196/11708.
    1. Marler JD, Fujii CA, Utley DS, Tesfamariam LJ, Galanko JA, Patrick H. Initial Assessment of a Comprehensive Digital Smoking Cessation Program That Incorporates a Mobile App, Breath Sensor, and Coaching: Cohort Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 04;7(2):e12609. doi: 10.2196/12609.
    1. Foulds J, Veldheer S, Hrabovsky S, Yingst J, Sciamanna C, Chen G, Maccani JZJ, Berg A. The effect of motivational lung age feedback on short-term quit rates in smokers seeking intensive group treatment: A randomized controlled pilot study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Aug 01;153:271–7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.007.
    1. Hajek P, West R, Lee A, Foulds J, Owen L, Eiser JR, Main N. Randomized controlled trial of a midwife-delivered brief smoking cessation intervention in pregnancy. Addiction. 2001 Mar;96(3):485–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96348511.x.
    1. Shahab L, West R, McNeill A. A randomized, controlled trial of adding expired carbon monoxide feedback to brief stop smoking advice: evaluation of cognitive and behavioral effects. Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):49–57. doi: 10.1037/a0021821.
    1. McClure JB, Ludman E, Grothaus L, Pabiniak C, Richards J, Mohelnitzky A. Immediate and short-term impact of a brief motivational smoking intervention using a biomedical risk assessment: the Get PHIT trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Apr;11(4):394–403. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp004.
    1. McClure JB, Ludman EJ, Grothaus L, Pabiniak C, Richards J. Impact of a brief motivational smoking cessation intervention the Get PHIT randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):116–23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.018.
    1. Choi W, Kim C, Lee O. Effects of brief smoking cessation education with expiratory carbon monoxide measurement on level of motivation to quit smoking. Korean J Fam Med. 2013 May;34(3):190–8. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.3.190.
    1. Borrelli B, Novak S, Hecht J, Emmons K, Papandonatos G, Abrams D. Home health care nurses as a new channel for smoking cessation treatment: outcomes from project CARES (Community-nurse Assisted Research and Education on Smoking) Prev Med. 2005;41(5-6):815–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.08.004.
    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor The Employment Situation – July 2019. USDL-19-1388. 2019. Aug 2, [2020-09-19].
    1. SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002 May;4(2):149–59. doi: 10.1080/14622200210123581.
    1. Prochaska J, Norcross J, Diclemente C. Applying the stages of change. Psychother Aust. 2013;19:15. doi: 10.1093/med:psych/9780199845491.003.0034.
    1. Walton K, Wang TW, Schauer GL, Hu S, McGruder HF, Jamal A, Babb S. State-Specific Prevalence of Quit Attempts Among Adult Cigarette Smokers - United States, 2011-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Jul 19;68(28):621–626. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6828a1. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6828a1.
    1. Farkas AJ. When does cigarette fading increase the likelihood of future cessation? Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(1):71–6. doi: 10.1007/BF02895036.
    1. Hughes JR, Cummings KM, Hyland A. Ability of smokers to reduce their smoking and its association with future smoking cessation. Addiction. 1999 Jan;94(1):109–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9411097.x.
    1. Falba T, Jofre-Bonet M, Busch S, Duchovny N, Sindelar J. Reduction of quantity smoked predicts future cessation among older smokers. Addiction. 2004 Jan;99(1):93–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00574.x.
    1. Hyland A, Levy DT, Rezaishiraz H, Hughes JR, Bauer JE, Giovino GA, Cummings KM. Reduction in amount smoked predicts future cessation. Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Jun;19(2):221–5. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.2.221.
    1. Broms U, Korhonen T, Kaprio J. Smoking reduction predicts cessation: longitudinal evidence from the Finnish adult twin cohort. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Mar;10(3):423–7. doi: 10.1080/14622200801888988.
    1. Joseph AM, Hecht SS, Murphy SE, Lando H, Carmella SG, Gross M, Bliss R, Le CT, Hatsukami DK. Smoking reduction fails to improve clinical and biological markers of cardiac disease: a randomized controlled trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Mar;10(3):471–81. doi: 10.1080/14622200801901948.
    1. Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, Estabrooks PA, Marcus AC, Ritzwoller DP, Smith TL, Levinson AH, Sukhanova A, O'Donnell C, Ferro EF, France EK. Long-term results of a smoking reduction program. Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):115–20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e18d1.
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Prochaska JM, Johnson JL. Size, consistency, and stability of stage effects for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2004 Jan;29(1):207–13. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(03)00086-8.
    1. Ferguson JA, Patten CA, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Eberman KM, Hurt RD. Predictors of 6-month tobacco abstinence among 1224 cigarette smokers treated for nicotine dependence. Addict Behav. 2003 Sep;28(7):1203–18. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00260-5.
    1. Chouinard M, Robichaud-Ekstrand S. Predictive value of the transtheoretical model to smoking cessation in hospitalized patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Feb;14(1):51–8. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328014027b.
    1. Ockene J, Kristeller JL, Goldberg R, Ockene I, Merriam P, Barrett S, Pekow P, Hosmer D, Gianelly R. Smoking cessation and severity of disease: the Coronary Artery Smoking Intervention Study. Health Psychol. 1992;11(2):119–26. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.11.2.119.
    1. Zhu S, Lee M, Zhuang Y, Gamst A, Wolfson T. Interventions to increase smoking cessation at the population level: how much progress has been made in the last two decades? Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):110–8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050371.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs—2014; pp. 1–141.
    1. Hughes JR. Reduced smoking: an introduction and review of the evidence. Addiction. 2000 Jan;95 Suppl 1:S3–7.
    1. Gualtieri L, Rosenbluth S, Phillips J. Can a Free Wearable Activity Tracker Change Behavior? The Impact of Trackers on Adults in a Physician-Led Wellness Group. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Nov 30;5(4):e237. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6534.
    1. Yingling L, Allen NA, Litchman ML, Colicchio V, Gibson BS. An Evaluation of Digital Health Tools for Diabetes Self-Management in Hispanic Adults: Exploratory Study. JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Jul 16;4(3):e12936. doi: 10.2196/12936.
    1. Alharbi M, Straiton N, Gallagher R. Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Dec;14(1):23–29. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0318-z.
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102–14.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren