Oxygen therapy during exercise training in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

M L Nonoyama, D Brooks, Y Lacasse, G H Guyatt, R S Goldstein, M L Nonoyama, D Brooks, Y Lacasse, G H Guyatt, R S Goldstein

Abstract

Background: Exercise training within the context of pulmonary rehabilitation improves outcomes of exercise capacity, dyspnea and health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Supplemental oxygen in comparison to placebo increases exercise capacity in patients performing single-assessment exercise tests. The addition of supplemental oxygen during exercise training may enable individuals with COPD to tolerate higher levels of activity with less exertional symptoms, ultimately improving quality of life.

Objectives: To determine how supplemental oxygen in comparison to control (compressed air or room air) during the exercise-training component of a pulmonary rehabilitation program affects exercise capacity, dyspnea and health-related quality of life in individuals with COPD.

Search strategy: All records in the Cochrane Airways Group Specialized Register of trials coded as 'COPD' were searched using the following terms: (oxygen* or O2*) AND (exercis* or train* or rehabilitat* or fitness* or physical* or activ* or endur* or exert* or walk* or cycle*). Searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases identified studies. The last search was carried out in June 2006.

Selection criteria: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oxygen-supplemented exercise training to non-supplemented exercise training (control group) were considered for inclusion. Participants were 18 years or older, diagnosed with COPD and did not meet criteria for long-term oxygen therapy. No studies with mixed populations (pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, etc) were included. Exercise training was greater than or equal to three weeks in duration and included a minimum of two sessions a week.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion in the review and extracted data. Weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Missing data were requested from authors of primary studies.

Main results: Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The maximum number of studies compared in the meta-analysis was three (31 on oxygen versus 32 control participants), because all included studies did not measure the same outcomes. When two studies were pooled, statistically significant improvements of oxygen-supplemented exercise training were found in constant power exercise time, WMD 2.68 minutes (95% CI 0.07 to 5.28 minutes). Supplemental oxygen increased the average exercise time from 6 to 14 minutes; the control intervention increased average exercise time from 6 to 12 minutes. Constant power exercise end-of-test Borg score (on a scale from 1 to 10) also showed statistically significant improvements with oxygen-supplemented exercise training, WMD -1.22 units (95% CI -2.39 to -0.06). One study showed a significant improvement in the change of Borg score after the shuttle walk test, by -1.46 units (95% CI -2.72 to -0.19). There were no significant differences in maximal exercise outcomes, functional exercise outcomes (six-minute walk test), shuttle walk distance, health-related quality of life or oxygenation status. According to the GRADE system most outcomes were rated as low quality because they were limited by study quality.

Authors' conclusions: This review provides little support for oxygen supplementation during exercise training for individuals with COPD, but the evidence is very limited. Studies with larger number of participants and strong design are required to permit strong conclusions, especially for functional outcomes such as symptom alleviation, health-related quality of life and ambulation.

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Flow Diagram Showing Progress Through the Systematic Review
2
2
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgments about each methodological quality item for each included study.
3
3
GRADE Evidence Table: Primary Results of Meta‐Analysis, Part A
4
4
GRADE Evidence Table: Primary Results of Meta‐Analysis , Part B
5
5
GRADE Evidence Table: Single‐Trial Meta‐analysis, Part A
6
6
GRADE Evidence Table: Single‐Trial Meta‐analysis, Part B
7
7
GRADE Evidence Table: Single‐Trial Meta‐analysis, Part C
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 1 Cycle Endurance ‐ exercise time (minutes).
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 2 Cycle Endurance ‐ energy expenditure, VO2 (L/min).
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 3 Cycle Endurance ‐ end‐of‐test borg dyspnea score.
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 4 Cycle Endurance ‐ SpO2 (%).
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 5 Maximal Test ‐ power (watts).
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 6 Maximal Test ‐ energy expenditure, VO2 max (L/min).
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 7 Maximal Test ‐ end‐of‐test borg dyspnea score.
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 8 Maximal Test ‐ SpO2 (%).
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 9 Maximal Test ‐ PaO2 (mmHg).
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 10 Cycle Endurance ‐ isotime energy expenditure, VO2 (L/min).
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 11 Cycle Endurance ‐ isotime SpO2 (%).
1.12. Analysis
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 12 Maximal Test ‐ isotime energy expenditure, VO2 (L/min).
1.13. Analysis
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 13 Maximal Test ‐ isotime SpO2 (%).
1.14. Analysis
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 14 Maximal Test ‐ isotime PaO2 (mmHg).
1.15. Analysis
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 15 6 Minute Walk Test ‐ distance (metres).
1.16. Analysis
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 16 6 Minute Walk Test ‐ end‐of‐test borg dyspnea score.
1.17. Analysis
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 17 6 Minute Walk Test ‐ SpO2 (%).
1.18. Analysis
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 18 Shuttle Walk Test ‐ distance (metres).
1.19. Analysis
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 19 Shuttle Walk Test ‐ end‐of‐test borg dyspnea score.
1.20. Analysis
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 20 SF36 ‐ physical function.
1.21. Analysis
1.21. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 21 SF36 ‐ physical role.
1.22. Analysis
1.22. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 22 SF36 ‐ bodily pain.
1.23. Analysis
1.23. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 23 SF36 ‐ general health.
1.24. Analysis
1.24. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 24 SF36 ‐ vitality.
1.25. Analysis
1.25. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 25 SF36 ‐ social function.
1.26. Analysis
1.26. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 26 SF36 ‐ emotional role.
1.27. Analysis
1.27. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 27 SF36 ‐ mental health.
1.28. Analysis
1.28. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 28 HAD ‐ total.
1.29. Analysis
1.29. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 29 LCADL ‐ total.
1.30. Analysis
1.30. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 30 Maximum training work level achieved (watts).
1.31. Analysis
1.31. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 31 Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire ‐ dyspnea (1‐7).
1.32. Analysis
1.32. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 32 Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire ‐ fatigue (1‐7).
1.33. Analysis
1.33. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 33 Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire ‐ emotion (1‐7).
1.34. Analysis
1.34. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 34 Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire ‐ mastery (1‐7).
1.35. Analysis
1.35. Analysis
Comparison 1 Oxygen Training versus Control Training (Random), Outcome 35 Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire ‐ total (1‐7).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren