The impact of endometrial thickness change after progesterone administration on pregnancy outcome in patients transferred with single frozen-thawed blastocyst

Zhiqin Bu, Xinhong Yang, Lin Song, Beijia Kang, Yingpu Sun, Zhiqin Bu, Xinhong Yang, Lin Song, Beijia Kang, Yingpu Sun

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the impact of endometrial thickness change after progesterone administration on pregnancy outcome in patients transferred with single frozen-thawed blastocyst.

Methods: This observational cohort study included a total of 3091 patients undergoing their first frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles between April 2015 to March 2019. Endometrial thickness was measured by trans-vaginal ultrasound twice for each patient: on day of progesterone administration, and on day of embryo transfer. The change of endometrial thickness was recorded.

Results: Regardless of endometrial preparation protocol (estrogen-progesterone/natural cycle), female age, body mass index (BMI), and infertility diagnosis were comparable between patients with an increasing endometrium on day of embryo transfer and those without. However, clinical pregnancy rate increases with increasing ratio of endometrial thickness. Compared with patients with Non-increase endometrium, those with an increasing endometrium on day of embryo transfer resulted in significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (56.21% vs 47.13%, P = 0.00 in estrogen-progesterone cycle; 55.15% vs 49.55%, P = 0.00 in natural cycle).

Conclusions: In most patients, endometrial thickness on day of embryo transfer (after progesterone administration) increased or kept being stable compared with that on day of progesterone administration. An increased endometrium after progesterone administration was associated with better pregnancy outcome.

Keywords: Endometrium; IVF/ICSI outcome; Infertility.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart. PGD preimplantation genetic diagnosis, P progesterone, E-P estrogen-progesterone
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between endometrium change ratio and clinical pregnancy rate. EP estrogen-progesterone, NC natural cycle

References

    1. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, Broekmans FJ. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:530–541. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu011.
    1. Griesinger G, Trevisan S, Cometti B. Endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer is a poor predictor of IVF treatment outcome. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018:x31. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox031.
    1. Bu Z, Wang K, Dai W, Sun Y. Endometrial thickness significantly affects clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:524–528. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1136616.
    1. Oron G, Hiersch L, Rona S, Prag-Rosenberg R, Sapir O, Tuttnauer-Hamburger M, Shufaro Y, Fisch B, Ben-Haroush A. Endometrial thickness of less than 7.5 mm is associated with obstetric complications in fresh IVF cycles: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;37:341–348. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.013.
    1. Shi W, Zhang S, Zhao W, Xia X, Wang M, Wang H, Bai H, Shi J. Factors related to clinical pregnancy after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: a retrospective and multivariate logistic regression analysis of 2313 transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1768–1775. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det094.
    1. Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, Coomarasamy A. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:202–223. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy044.
    1. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:291–298. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.011.
    1. Yang W, Zhang T, Li Z, Ren X, Huang B, Zhu G, Jin L. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting clinical outcomes of frozen embryo transfer cycles with morphological good-quality blastocyst: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9577. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009577.
    1. Bu Z, Sun Y. The impact of endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic Gonadotrophin (hCG) administration on ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with different ovarian response. PLoS One. 2015;10:e145703.
    1. Chen SL, Wu FR, Luo C, Chen X, Shi XY, Zheng HY, Ni YP. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30.
    1. Liu K, Hartman M, Hartman A, Luo Z, Mahutte N. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1883–1888. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey281.
    1. Gallos Ioannis D, Khairy Mohammed, Chu Justin, Rajkhowa Madhurima, Tobias Aurelio, Campbell Alison, Dowell Ken, Fishel Simon, Coomarasamy Arri. Optimal endometrial thickness to maximize live births and minimize pregnancy losses: Analysis of 25,767 fresh embryo transfers. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2018;37(5):542–548. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.08.025.
    1. Barker MA, Boehnlein LM, Kovacs P, Lindheim SR. Follicular and luteal phase endometrial thickness and echogenic pattern and pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:243–249. doi: 10.1007/s10815-009-9312-z.
    1. Haas Jigal, Smith Ramsey, Zilberberg Eran, Nayot Dan, Meriano James, Barzilay Eran, Casper Robert F. Endometrial compaction (decreased thickness) in response to progesterone results in optimal pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Fertility and Sterility. 2019;112(3):503-509.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.001.
    1. Wang ZM. Transvaginal ultrasonographic monitoring on the morphological changes of ovary and endometrium during normal menstrual cycle. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1993;28:18–20.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren