Breast stimulation in low-risk primigravidas at term: does it aid in spontaneous onset of labour and vaginal delivery? A pilot study
Nilanchali Singh, Reva Tripathi, Yedla Manikya Mala, Niharika Yedla, Nilanchali Singh, Reva Tripathi, Yedla Manikya Mala, Niharika Yedla
Abstract
Aims: The aim of the study was to elicit the safety and efficacy of breast stimulation as an intervention to prevent postdatism and as an aid in spontaneous onset of labour.
Methods: Primigravidas with cephalic presentation, without any high-risk factor, were recruited between 36 to 38 weeks of gestation. 200 patients were recruited and randomized into two groups (n = 100). Breast stimulation was advised to one group but not to the other group. Bishop's scoring was done at 38 weeks and repeated at 39 weeks of gestation. Maternal and fetal outcomes were compared in two groups.
Result: Bishop's score changed from 3.12 (±1.01) to 3.9 (±1.08) in control group and from 3.02 (±0.82) to 6.08 (±1.29) in breast stimulation group after one week (P value < 0.0001). The period of gestation at delivery was 39.5 (±2.3) weeks in control group and 39.2 (±2.8) weeks in intervention group (P value: 0.044). There were increased chances of vaginal delivery in intervention group (P value: 0.046). Duration of labor, hyperstimulation, presence of meconium stained liquor, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups.
Conclusion: Breast stimulation in low-risk primigravidas helps in cervical ripening and increases chances of vaginal delivery.
Figures
References
- Kiesewetter B., Lehner R. Maternal outcome monitoring: induction of labour versus spontaneous onset of labor—a retrospective data analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012;286(1):38–41. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2239-0.
- Vardo J. H., Thornburg L. L., Glantz J. C. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2011;56(1-2):25–30.
- Chaudhry Z., Fischer J., Schaffir J. Women's use of nonprescribed methods to induce labor: a brief report. Birth. 2011;38(2):168–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00465.x.
- Moeglin D., Baldauf J. J., Legrand A., Ritter J., Gandar R. Value and indications for nipple stimulation in obstetrics. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 1986;15(3):355–359.
- Gülmezoglu A. M., Crowther C. A., Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;6CD004945
- Razgaitis E. J., Lyvers A. N. Management of protracted active labor with nipple stimulation: a viable tool for midwives? Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2010;55(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.05.002.
- Kavanagh J., Kelly A. J., Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;3CD003392
- Elliott J. P., Flaherty J. F. The use of breast stimulation to prevent postdate pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1984;149(6):628–632. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90247-3.
- Aragão J. R. B. F., Feitosa F. E. D. L., Alencar C. A., Jr., Vasconcelos R. P., de Amorim M. M. R., Passini R., Jr. Cervical ultrasonography versus bishop score as a predictor of vaginal delivery. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2011;33(11):361–366. doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032011001100007.
- Adewole I. F., Franklin O., Matiluko A. A. Cervical ripening and induction of labour by breast stimulation. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 1993;22(4):81–85.
- Salmon Y. M., Kee W. H., Tan S. L., Jen S. W. Cervical ripening by breast stimulation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1986;67(1):21–24. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198603001-00007.
- Schröcksnadel H., Sachsenmaier M., Reider W. Experiences with nipple stimulation for inducing uterine contractions. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 1990;50(7):569–571. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026302.
- Segal S., Gemer O., Zohav E., Siani M., Sassoon E. Evaluation of breast stimulation for induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean section and in grandmultiparas. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1995;74(1):40–41. doi: 10.3109/00016349509009941.
Source: PubMed