Development of a hoRizontal data intEgration classifier for NOn-invasive early diAgnosis of breasT cancEr: the RENOVATE study protocol

Francesco Ravera, Gabriella Cirmena, Martina Dameri, Maurizio Gallo, Valerio Gaetano Vellone, Piero Fregatti, Daniele Friedman, Massimo Calabrese, Alberto Ballestrero, Alberto Tagliafico, Lorenzo Ferrando, Gabriele Zoppoli, Francesco Ravera, Gabriella Cirmena, Martina Dameri, Maurizio Gallo, Valerio Gaetano Vellone, Piero Fregatti, Daniele Friedman, Massimo Calabrese, Alberto Ballestrero, Alberto Tagliafico, Lorenzo Ferrando, Gabriele Zoppoli

Abstract

Introduction: Standard procedures aimed at the early diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) present suboptimal accuracy and imply the execution of invasive and sometimes unnecessary tissue biopsies. The assessment of circulating biomarkers for diagnostic purposes, together with radiomics, is of great potential in BC management.

Methods and analysis: This is a prospective translational study investigating the accuracy of the combined assessment of multiple circulating analytes together with radiomic variables for early BC diagnosis. Up to 750 patients will be recruited at their presentation at the Diagnostic Senology Unit of Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (Genoa, IT) for the execution of a diagnostic biopsy after the detection of a suspect breast lesion (t0). Each recruited patient will be asked to donate peripheral blood and urine before undergoing breast biopsy. Blood and urine samples will also be collected from a cohort of 100 patients with negative mammography. For cases with histological diagnosis of invasive BC, a second sample of blood and urine will be collected after breast surgery. Circulating tumour DNA, cell-free methylated DNA and circulating proteins will be assessed in samples collected at t0 from patients with stage I-IIA BC at surgery together with those collected from patients with histologically confirmed benign lesions of similar size and from healthy controls with negative mammography. These analyses will be combined with radiomic variables extracted with freeware algorithms applied to cases and matched controls for which digital mammography is available. The overall goal of the present study is to develop a horizontal data integration classifier for the early diagnosis of BC.

Ethics and dissemination: This research protocol has been approved by Regione Liguria Ethics Committee (reference number: 2019/75, study ID: 4452). Patients will be required to provide written informed consent. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Trial registration number: NCT04781062.

Keywords: adult oncology; breast imaging; breast tumours; cancer genetics; health informatics.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study diagram. Blood and urine samples will be collected from patients yielding a radiological breast lesion ≤2 cm with no evidence of lymph node neoplastic dissemination (radiological T1N0). Images and samples acquired from patients with stage I–IIA (T1N0 or T2N0 or T1N1a neoplasia) BC at surgery will be analysed for diagnostic purposes together with images and samples acquired from patients yielding benign breast lesions and from patients with negative mammography. Blood and urine samples will be re-collected from all patients yielding invasive neoplasia at diagnosis after surgery at the first oncological visit, and will be analysed for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample size diagram. Approximately 1500 breast biopsies per year are performed at the Diagnostics Senology Unit of San Martino Hospital. Of a projected number of 750 liquid biopsies, we foresee to collect samples and acquire mammograms from at least 49 patients with stage I–IIA BC, and 98 patients with radiological size-matched lesions, along with those samples and images acquired from 100 healthy women with two consecutive negative mammograms. BC, breast cancer.

References

    1. Sprague BL, Arao RF, Miglioretti DL, et al. . National performance benchmarks for modern diagnostic digital mammography: update from the breast cancer surveillance Consortium. Radiology 2017;283:59–69. 10.1148/radiol.2017161519
    1. Tagliafico AS, Calabrese M, Mariscotti G, et al. . Adjunct screening with Tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with Mammography-Negative dense breasts: interim report of a prospective comparative trial. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1882–8. 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4147
    1. Chung W, Eum HH, Lee H-O, et al. . Single-Cell RNA-seq enables comprehensive tumour and immune cell profiling in primary breast cancer. Nat Commun 2017;8:15081. 10.1038/ncomms15081
    1. Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, et al. . Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:224ra24. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094
    1. Cohen JD, Li L, Wang Y, et al. . Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science 2018;359:926–30. 10.1126/science.aar3247
    1. Best MG, Sol N, Kooi I, et al. . RNA-Seq of Tumor-Educated platelets enables blood-based pan-cancer, multiclass, and molecular pathway cancer diagnostics. Cancer Cell 2015;28:666–76. 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.018
    1. Bhome R, Del Vecchio F, Lee G-H, et al. . Exosomal microRNAs (exomiRs): small molecules with a big role in cancer. Cancer Lett 2018;420:228–35. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.02.002
    1. Shen SY, Singhania R, Fehringer G, et al. . Sensitive tumour detection and classification using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes. Nature 2018;563:579–83. 10.1038/s41586-018-0703-0
    1. Kalluri R. The biology and function of exosomes in cancer. J Clin Invest 2016;126:1208–15. 10.1172/JCI81135
    1. Valdora F, Houssami N, Rossi F, et al. . Rapid review: radiomics and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018;169:217–29. 10.1007/s10549-018-4675-4
    1. Bhawal R, Oberg AL, Zhang S, et al. . Challenges and opportunities in clinical applications of blood-based proteomics in cancer. Cancers 2020;12. 10.3390/cancers12092428. [Epub ahead of print: 27 08 2020].
    1. Alimirzaie S, Bagherzadeh M, Akbari MR. Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review. Clin Genet 2019;95:643–60. 10.1111/cge.13514
    1. Aravanis AM, Lee M, Klausner RD. Next-Generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA for early cancer detection. Cell 2017;168:571–4. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.030
    1. Bennett NC, Farah CS. Next-Generation sequencing in clinical oncology: next steps towards clinical validation. Cancers 2014;6:2296–312. 10.3390/cancers6042296
    1. Stirzaker C, Taberlay PC, Statham AL, et al. . Mining cancer methylomes: prospects and challenges. Trends Genet 2014;30:75–84. 10.1016/j.tig.2013.11.004
    1. Salomon MP, Orozco JIJ, Wilmott JS, et al. . Brain metastasis DNA methylomes, a novel resource for the identification of biological and clinical features. Sci Data 2018;5:180245. 10.1038/sdata.2018.245
    1. Anfossi S, Babayan A, Pantel K, et al. . Clinical utility of circulating non-coding RNAs - an update. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15:541–63. 10.1038/s41571-018-0035-x
    1. Koh W, Pan W, Gawad C, et al. . Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of tissue-specific global gene expression in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:7361–6. 10.1073/pnas.1405528111
    1. AACR Project GENIE Consortium . AACR project genie: Powering precision medicine through an international Consortium. Cancer Discov 2017;7:818–31. 10.1158/-17-0151
    1. Nuzzo PV, Berchuck JE, Korthauer K, et al. . Detection of renal cell carcinoma using plasma and urine cell-free DNA methylomes. Nat Med 2020;26:1041–3. 10.1038/s41591-020-0933-1
    1. Nassiri F, Chakravarthy A, Feng S, et al. . Detection and discrimination of intracranial tumors using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes. Nat Med 2020;26:1044–7. 10.1038/s41591-020-0932-2
    1. Shen SY, Burgener JM, Bratman SV, et al. . Preparation of cfMeDIP-seq libraries for methylome profiling of plasma cell-free DNA. Nat Protoc 2019;14:2749–80. 10.1038/s41596-019-0202-2
    1. Webber J, Stone TC, Katilius E, et al. . Proteomics analysis of cancer exosomes using a novel modified aptamer-based array (SOMAscan™) platform. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014;13:1050–64. 10.1074/mcp.M113.032136
    1. Raffield LM, Dang H, Pratte KA, et al. . Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 2020;20:e1900278. 10.1002/pmic.201900278
    1. Lambin P, van Stiphout RGPM, Starmans MHW, et al. . Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013;10:27–40. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.196
    1. Dietterich TG. Machine-learning research; four current directions. Available:
    1. Thrun S, Pratt L. Learning to Learn: Introduction and Overview. In: Thrun S, Pratt L, eds. Learning to learn. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1998: 3–17.
    1. Dobbin KK, Simon RM. Sample size planning for developing classifiers using high-dimensional DNA microarray data. Biostatistics 2007;8:101–17. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj036
    1. Dobbin KK, Zhao Y, Simon RM. How large a training set is needed to develop a classifier for microarray data? Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:108–14. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0443
    1. Qiu J, Xu J, Zhang K, et al. . Refining cancer management using integrated liquid biopsy. Theranostics 2020;10:2374–84. 10.7150/thno.40677

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren