Patient journey during and after a pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy: a cross-sectional patient registry study

Rianne C Bijl, Sophie E Bangert, Raj Shree, Alina N Brewer, Norlisa Abrenica-Keffer, Eleni Z Tsigas, Maria P H Koster, Ellen W Seely, Rianne C Bijl, Sophie E Bangert, Raj Shree, Alina N Brewer, Norlisa Abrenica-Keffer, Eleni Z Tsigas, Maria P H Koster, Ellen W Seely

Abstract

Objectives: To gain insight into the patient journey through a pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy.

Design: Cross-sectional patient registry study.

Setting: Online patient registry initiated by the Preeclampsia Foundation.

Participants: Women with a history of pre-eclampsia enrolled in The Preeclampsia Registry (TPR).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Retrospective patient-reported experience measures concerning awareness of pre-eclampsia, timing and type of information on pre-eclampsia received, involvement in decision making regarding medical care, mental/emotional impact of the pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy and impact on future pregnancy planning.

Results: Of 3618 TPR-participants invited to complete the Patient Journey questionnaire, data from 833 (23%) responders were available for analysis. Most responders were white (n=795, 95.4%) and lived in the USA (n=728, 87.4%). Before their pre-eclampsia diagnosis, 599 (73.9%) responders were aware of the term 'pre-eclampsia', but only 348 (43.7%) were aware of its associated symptoms. Women with a lower level of education were less likely to have heard of pre-eclampsia (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62). Around the time of diagnosis, 29.2% of responders did not feel involved in the decision making, which was associated with reporting a serious mental/emotional impact of the pre-eclampsia experience (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.84). Over time, there was an increase in the proportion of women who were aware of the symptoms of pre-eclampsia (32.2% before 2011 to 52.5% after 2016; p<0.001) and in the proportion of responders stating they received counselling about the later-life health risks associated with pre-eclampsia (14.2% before 2011 to 25.6% after 2016; p=0.005).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that improved patient education regarding pre-eclampsia is needed, that shared decision making is of great importance to patients to enhance their healthcare experience, and that healthcare providers should make efforts to routinely incorporate counselling about the later-life health risks associated with pre-eclampsia.

Trial registration number: NCT02020174.

Keywords: hypertension; maternal medicine; mental health; quality in health care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of responders Patient Journey questionnaire in the Preeclampsia Registry (TPR). HDP, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences in responses over time. (A). Were you aware of the symptoms associated with pre-eclampsia before you were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia in this pregnancy? (B) Did you feel that you were adequately involved in making decisions about your care? (C) Were you instructed to follow up with your healthcare provider regarding your diagnosis of pre-eclampsia? (D) Did anyone speak to you about the potential long-term health consequences as a result of pre-eclampsia?.

References

    1. Ananth CV, Keyes KM, Wapner RJ. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ 2013;347:f6564. 10.1136/bmj.f6564
    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2019;68:1–47.
    1. Roes EM, Raijmakers MT, Schoonenberg M, et al. . Physical well-being in women with a history of severe preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18:39–45. 10.1080/14767050500127740
    1. Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, et al. . Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007;335:974. 10.1136/
    1. Stuart JJ, Tanz LJ, Missmer SA, et al. . Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and maternal cardiovascular disease risk factor development: an observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:224–32. 10.7326/M17-2740
    1. PreeclampsiaFoundation . Our stories: preeclampsia Foundation, 2021. Available:
    1. Kidner MC, Flanders-Stepans MB. A model for the HELLP syndrome: the maternal experience. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004;33:44–53. 10.1177/0884217503261131
    1. Hoedjes M, Berks D, Vogel I, et al. . Symptoms of post-traumatic stress after preeclampsia. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2011;32:126–34. 10.3109/0167482X.2011.599460
    1. Hoedjes M, Berks D, Vogel I, et al. . Poor health-related quality of life after severe preeclampsia. Birth 2011;38:246–55. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00477.x
    1. Moriarty DG, Zack MM, Kobau R. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthy Days Measures - population tracking of perceived physical and mental health over time. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:37. 10.1186/1477-7525-1-37
    1. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010;363:2477–81. 10.1056/NEJMp1011024
    1. Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education 2017;17:137–44. 10.1093/bjaed/mkw060
    1. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001570. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570
    1. Trebble TM, Hansi N, Hydes T, et al. . Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction. BMJ 2010;341:c4078. 10.1136/bmj.c4078
    1. Coulter A, Locock L, Ziebland S, et al. . Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care. BMJ 2014;348:g2225. 10.1136/bmj.g2225
    1. Depla AL, Ernst-Smelt HE, Poels M, et al. . A feasibility study of implementing a patient-centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth. Health Sci Rep 2020;3:e168. 10.1002/hsr2.168
    1. Gammill HS, Chettier R, Brewer A, et al. . Cardiomyopathy and preeclampsia. Circulation 2018;138:2359–66. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031527
    1. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948;32:221–33. 10.1037/h0057532
    1. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. . Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1404–23. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.005
    1. Okoth K, Chandan JS, Marshall T, et al. . Association between the reproductive health of young women and cardiovascular disease in later life: umbrella review. BMJ 2020;371:m3502. 10.1136/bmj.m3502
    1. You WB, Wolf M, Bailey SC, et al. . Factors associated with patient understanding of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2012;31:341–9. 10.3109/10641955.2010.507851
    1. Wilkinson J, Cole G. Preeclampsia knowledge among women in Utah. Hypertens Pregnancy 2018;37:18–24. 10.1080/10641955.2017.1397691
    1. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice Bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237–60. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891
    1. Glass KE, Wills CE, Holloman C, et al. . Shared decision making and other variables as correlates of satisfaction with health care decisions in a United States national survey. Patient Educ Couns 2012;88:100–5. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.010
    1. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1122–31. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88
    1. Bushnell C, McCullough LD, Awad IA, et al. . Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart Association/American stroke association. Stroke 2014;45:1545–88. 10.1161/01.str.0000442009.06663.48
    1. Heidrich M-B, Wenzel D, von Kaisenberg CS, et al. . Preeclampsia and long-term risk of cardiovascular disease: what do obstetrician-gynecologists know? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:61. 10.1186/1471-2393-13-61
    1. Wilkins-Haug L, Celi A, Thomas A, et al. . Recognition by women's health care providers of long-term cardiovascular disease risk after preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:1287–92. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000856
    1. U.S. Census Bureau . QuickFacts United States, 2019. Available:
    1. Shapiro J. Illness narratives: reliability, authenticity and the empathic witness. Med Humanit 2011;37:68–72. 10.1136/jmh.2011.007328
    1. van Giezen AE, Arensman E, Spinhoven P, et al. . Consistency of memory for emotionally arousing events: a review of prospective and experimental studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2005;25:935–53. 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.011
    1. Celi AC, Seely EW, Wang P, et al. . Caring for women after hypertensive pregnancies and beyond: implementation and integration of a postpartum transition clinic. Matern Child Health J 2019;23:1459–66. 10.1007/s10995-019-02768-7
    1. Seely EW, Celi AC, Chausmer J, et al. . Cardiovascular health after preeclampsia: patient and provider perspective. J Womens Health 2021;30:305–13. 10.1089/jwh.2020.8384
    1. Benschop L, Duvekot JJ, Versmissen J, et al. . Blood pressure profile 1 year after severe preeclampsia. Hypertension 2018;71:491–8. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10338
    1. Smith GN, Pudwell J, Roddy M. The maternal health clinic: a new window of opportunity for early heart disease risk screening and intervention for women with pregnancy complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013;35:831–9. 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30841-0

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren