Randomised masked clinical trial of the MGDRx EyeBag for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction-related evaporative dry eye
Paramdeep Singh Bilkhu, Shehzad Anjam Naroo, James Stuart Wolffsohn, Paramdeep Singh Bilkhu, Shehzad Anjam Naroo, James Stuart Wolffsohn
Abstract
Background/aims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the MGDRx EyeBag (The Eyebag Company, Halifax, UK) eyelid warming device.
Methods: Twenty-five patients with confirmed meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related evaporative dry eye were enrolled into a randomised, single masked, contralateral clinical trial. Test eyes received a heated device; control eyes a non-heated device for 5 min twice a day for 2 weeks. Efficacy (ocular symptomology, non-invasive break-up time, lipid layer thickness, osmolarity, meibomian gland dropout and function) and safety (visual acuity, corneal topography, conjunctival hyperaemia and staining) measurements were taken at baseline and follow-up. Subsequent patient device usage and ocular comfort was ascertained at 6 months.
Results: Differences between test and control eyes at baseline were not statistically significant for all measurements (p>0.05). After 2 weeks, statistically significant improvements occurred in all efficacy measurements in test eyes (p<0.05). Visual acuity and corneal topography were unaffected (p>0.05). All patients maintained higher ocular comfort after 6 months (p<0.05), although the benefit was greater in those who continued usage 1-8 times a month (p<0.001).
Conclusions: The MGDRx EyeBag is a safe and effective device for the treatment of MGD-related evaporative dry eye. Subjective benefit lasts at least 6 months, aided by occasional retreatment.
Trial registration number: NCT01870180.
Keywords: Ocular surface; Tears; Treatment other.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Figures
References
- Geerling G, Tauber J, Baudouin C, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:2050–64.
- Goto E, Monden Y, Takano Y, et al. Treatment of non-inflamed obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction by an infrared warm compression device. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1403–7.
- Olson MC, Korb DR, Greiner JV. Increase in tear film lipid layer thickness following treatment with warm compresses in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:96–9.
- Mori A, Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, et al. Disposable eyelid-warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003;47:578–86.
- Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Goto E, et al. Efficacy of a new warm moist air device on tear functions of patients with simple meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea 2006;25:644–50.
- Ishida R, Matsumoto Y, Onguchi T, et al. Tear Film with “Orgahexa EyeMasks” in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:684–91.
- Friedland BR, Fleming CP, Blackie CA, et al. A novel thermodynamic treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction. Curr Eye Res 2011;6:79–87.
- Greiner JV. A single LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System treatment improves meibomian gland function and reduces dry eye symptoms for 9 months. Curr Eye Res 2012;37:272–8.
- Lane SS, DuBiner HB, Epstein RJ, et al. A new system, the LipiFlow, for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea 2012;31:396–404.
- Greiner JV. Long-term (12-month) improvement in meibomian gland function and reduced dry eye symptoms with a single thermal pulsation treatment. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;41:524–30.
- Blackie CA, Solomon JD, Greiner JV, et al. Inner eyelid surface temperature as a function of warm compress methodology. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:675–83.
- Bilkhu PS, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS. Effect of a commercially available warm compress on eyelid temperature and tear film in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci 2014;91:163–70.
- Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:2006–49.
- Tomlinson A, McCann LC, Pearce EI. Comparison of human tear film osmolarity measured by electrical impedance and freezing point depression techniques. Cornea 2010;29:1036–41.
- Guillon JP. Non-invasive tearscope plus routine for contact lens fitting. Contact Lens Ant Eye 1998;21:31–40.
- Wolffsohn JS, Purslow C. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2003;26:27–35.
- Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea 2003;22:640–50.
- Mathers WD, Shields WJ, Sachdev MS, et al. Meibomian gland dysfunction in chronic blepharitis. Cornea 1991;10:277–85.
- Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:1938–78.
- Foulks GN. The correlation between the tear film lipid layer and dry eye disease. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:369–74.
- Isreb MA, Greiner JV, Korb DR, et al. Correlation of lipid layer thickness measurements with fluorescein tear film break-up time and Schirmer's test. Eye 2003;17:79–83.
- Mathers W. Evaporation from the ocular surface. Exp Eye Res 2004;78:389–94.
- Purslow C. Evaluation of the ocular tolerance of a novel eyelid-warming device used for meibomian gland dysfunction. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2013;36:226–31.
- McMonnies CW, Korb DR, Blackie CA. The role of heat in rubbing and massage-related corneal deformation. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2012;35:148–54.
- Solomon JD, Case CL, Greiner JV, et al. Warm compress induced visual degradation and Fischer-Schweitzer polygonal reflex. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:580–7.
Source: PubMed