Effect of Psychiatric Advance Directives Facilitated by Peer Workers on Compulsory Admission Among People With Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Aurélie Tinland, Sandrine Loubière, Frederic Mougeot, Emmanuelle Jouet, Magali Pontier, Karine Baumstarck, Anderson Loundou, Nicolas Franck, Christophe Lançon, Pascal Auquier, DAiP Group, Lee Antoine, Elsa Castot, Nicolas Grand Ordener, Julien Grard, Juliette Robert, Antoine Simon, Aurélien Troisoeufs, Aurélie Tinland, Sandrine Loubière, Frederic Mougeot, Emmanuelle Jouet, Magali Pontier, Karine Baumstarck, Anderson Loundou, Nicolas Franck, Christophe Lançon, Pascal Auquier, DAiP Group, Lee Antoine, Elsa Castot, Nicolas Grand Ordener, Julien Grard, Juliette Robert, Antoine Simon, Aurélien Troisoeufs

Abstract

Importance: Reducing the use of coercion in mental health care is crucial from a human rights and public health perspective. Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are promising tools that may reduce compulsory admissions. Assessments of PADs have included facilitation by health care agents but not facilitation by peer workers.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of PADs facilitated by peer workers (PW-PAD) in people with mental disorders.

Design, setting, and participants: A multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 7 French mental health facilities. Adults with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, or schizoaffective disorder who had a compulsory admission in the past 12 months and the capacity to consent were enrolled between January 2019 and June 2020 and followed up for 12 months.

Interventions: The PW-PAD group was invited to fill out a PAD form and meet a peer worker who was trained to assist in completing and sharing the form with relatives and psychiatrists.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the rate of compulsory admission at 12 months after randomization. The overall psychiatric admission rate, therapeutic alliance, quality of life, mental health symptoms, empowerment, and recovery outcomes were also investigated.

Results: Among 394 allocated participants (median age, 39 years; 39.3% female; 45% with schizophrenia, 36% bipolar I disorder, and 19% schizoaffective disorder), 196 were assigned to the PW-PAD group and 198 to the control group. In the PW-PAD group, 27.0% had compulsory admissions compared with 39.9% in the control group (risk difference, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.04; P = .007). No significant differences were found in the rate of overall admissions, therapeutic alliance score, and quality of life. Participants in the PW-PAD group exhibited fewer symptoms (effect size, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.40 to 0.00), greater empowerment (effect size, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.50), and a higher recovery score (effect size, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.65), compared with those in the control group.

Conclusions and relevance: Peer worker-facilitated PADs are effective in decreasing compulsory hospital admissions and increasing some mental health outcomes (self-perceived symptoms, empowerment, and recovery). Involving peer workers in the completion of PADs supports the current shift of mental health care from substitute decision-making to supported decision-making.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03630822.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Tinland, Loubière, and Jouet reported grants from the French Ministry of Health Directorate General of Health Care Services (DGOS) during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. CONSORT Flow Diagram for the DAiP…
Figure.. CONSORT Flow Diagram for the DAiP Trial (Peer Worker–Facilitated Psychiatric Advance Directive Study)
ITT indicates intention to treat; PADs, psychiatric advance directives.

References

    1. Barber H. Seclusion, restraint and coercion: abuse “far too common” in mental health services across the world. The Telegraph. Published June 10, 2021. Accessed October 14, 2021.
    1. World Health Organization . Guidance on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. Accessed October 14, 2021.
    1. Rodrigues M, Hermann H, Galderisi S, Allan J. Implementing alternatives to coercion: a key component of improving mental health care. World Psychiatric Association. Published October 2020. Accessed November 1, 2021.
    1. de Jong MH, Kamperman AM, Oorschot M, et al. . Interventions to reduce compulsory psychiatric admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(7):657-664. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0501
    1. Molyneaux E, Turner A, Candy B, Landau S, Johnson S, Lloyd-Evans B. Crisis-planning interventions for people with psychotic illness or bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analyses. BJPsych Open. 2019;5(4):e53. doi:10.1192/bjo.2019.28
    1. Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Elbogen EB, et al. . Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1943-1951. doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1943
    1. Szmukler G. Treatment pressures, coercion and compulsion in mental health care. J Ment Health. 2008;17(3):229-231. doi:10.1080/09638230802156731
    1. Hem MH, Gjerberg E, Husum TL, Pedersen R. Ethical challenges when using coercion in mental healthcare: a systematic literature review. Nurs Ethics. 2018;25(1):92-110. doi:10.1177/0969733016629770
    1. Larsen IB, Terkelsen TB. Coercion in a locked psychiatric ward: perspectives of patients and staff. Nurs Ethics. 2014;21(4):426-436. doi:10.1177/0969733013503601
    1. Scheyett AM, Kim MM, Swanson JW, Swartz MS. Psychiatric advance directives: a tool for consumer empowerment and recovery. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007;31(1):70-75. doi:10.2975/31.1.2007.70.75
    1. Papageorgiou A, King M, Janmohamed A, Davidson O, Dawson J. Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental illness: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;181(6):513-519. doi:10.1192/bjp.181.6.513
    1. Ruchlewska A, Wierdsma AI, Kamperman AM, et al. . Effect of crisis plans on admissions and emergency visits: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91882. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091882
    1. Davidson L, Bellamy C, Guy K, Miller R. Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry. 2012;11(2):123-128. doi:10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.009
    1. Easter MM, Swanson JW, Robertson AG, Moser LL, Swartz MS. Facilitation of psychiatric advance directives by peers and clinicians on Assertive Community Treatment teams. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(7):717-723. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201600423
    1. Belden CM, Gilbert AR, Easter MM, Swartz MS, Swanson JW. Appropriateness of psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer support specialists and clinicians on Assertive Community Treatment teams. J Ment Health. 2022;31(2):239-245. doi:10.1080/09638237.2021.1952946
    1. Tinland A, Leclerc L, Loubière S, et al. . Psychiatric advance directives for people living with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorders, or schizoaffective disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: DAiP study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):422. doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2416-9
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. Law Hum Behav. 1995;19(2):105-126. doi:10.1007/BF01499321
    1. Misdrahi D, Verdoux H, Lançon C, Bayle F. The 4-Point ordinal Alliance Self-report: a self-report questionnaire for assessing therapeutic relationships in routine mental health. Compr Psychiatry. 2009;50(2):181-185. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.06.010
    1. Auquier P, Simeoni MC, Sapin C, et al. . Development and validation of a patient-based health-related quality of life questionnaire in schizophrenia: the S-QoL. Schizophr Res. 2003;63(1-2):137-149. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00355-9
    1. EuroQol Group . EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208. doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
    1. Conrad KJ, Yagelka JR, Matters MD, Rich AR, Williams V, Buchanan M. Reliability and validity of a modified Colorado Symptom Index in a national homeless sample. Ment Health Serv Res. 2001;3(3):141-153. doi:10.1023/A:1011571531303
    1. Rogers ES, Chamberlin J, Ellison ML, Crean T. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(8):1042-1047. doi:10.1176/ps.48.8.1042
    1. Labbé É, Moulin JJ, Guéguen R, Sass C, Chatain C, Gerbaud L. Un indicateur de mesure de la précarité et de la santé sociale: le score EPICES. La Revue de l’Ires. 2007;53(1):3-49.
    1. Thornicroft G, Farrelly S, Szmukler G, et al. . Clinical outcomes of Joint Crisis Plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1634-1641. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60105-1
    1. Henderson C, Flood C, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Sutherby K, Szmukler G. Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2004;329(7458):136. doi:10.1136/bmj.38155.585046.63
    1. Plancke L, Amariei A, Flament C, Dumesnil C. Psychiatric readmissions: individual and organizational factors. Article in French. Sante Publique. 2017;29(6):829-836. doi:10.3917/spub.176.0829
    1. van Buuren S. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007;16(3):219-242. doi:10.1177/0962280206074463
    1. Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(2):147-177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147
    1. Chieze M, Hurst S, Kaiser S, Sentissi O. Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:491. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491
    1. Tingleff EB, Bradley SK, Gildberg FA, Munksgaard G, Hounsgaard L. “Treat me with respect”: a systematic review and thematic analysis of psychiatric patients’ reported perceptions of the situations associated with the process of coercion. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017;24(9-10):681-698. doi:10.1111/jpm.12410
    1. Nyttingnes O, Ruud T, Rugkåsa J. ‘It’s unbelievably humiliating’: patients’ expressions of negative effects of coercion in mental health care. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;49(pt A):147-153. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.08.009
    1. Sheridan Rains L, Zenina T, Dias MC, et al. . Variations in patterns of involuntary hospitalisation and in legal frameworks: an international comparative study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(5):403-417. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30090-2
    1. Lay B, Kawohl W, Rössler W. Outcomes of a psycho-education and monitoring programme to prevent compulsory admission to psychiatric inpatient care: a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2018;48(5):849-860. doi:10.1017/S0033291717002239
    1. Barrenger SL, Stanhope V, Miller E. Capturing the value of peer support: measuring recovery-oriented services. J Public Ment Health. 2019;18(3):180-187. doi:10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0022
    1. Pitt V, Lowe D, Hill S, et al. . Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD004807. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2
    1. White S, Foster R, Marks J, et al. . The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):534. doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3
    1. Lloyd-Evans B, Mayo-Wilson E, Harrison B, et al. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:39. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-39
    1. Bellamy C, Schmutte T, Davidson L. An update on the growing evidence base for peer support. Ment Health Soc Incl. 2017;21(3):161-167. doi:10.1108/MHSI-03-2017-0014

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren