Required dose of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of vecuronium-induced shallow residual neuromuscular block at a train-of-four ratio of 0.3

Jing He, Huan He, Xing Li, Mei Sun, Zhihao Lai, Bo Xu, Jing He, Huan He, Xing Li, Mei Sun, Zhihao Lai, Bo Xu

Abstract

Residual shallow neuromuscular block (NMB) is potentially harmful and contributes to critical respiratory events. Evidence for the optimal dose of sugammadex required to reverse vecuronium-induced shallow NMB is scarce. The aims of the present study were to find suitable doses of sugammadex and neostigmine to reverse a residual vecuronium-induced NMB from a time of flight (TOF) ratio of 0.3-0.9 and evaluate their safety and efficacy. In total, 121 patients aged 18-65 years were randomly assigned to 11 groups to receive placebo, sugammadex (doses of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg), or neostigmine (doses of 10, 25, 40, 55, or 70 μg/kg). The reversal time of sugammadex and neostigmine to antagonize a vecuronium-induced shallow residual NMB (i.e., TOF ratio of 0.3) and related adverse reactions were recorded. Several statistical models were tested to find an appropriate statistical model to explore the suitable doses of sugammadex and neostigmine required to reverse a residual vecuronium-induced NMB. Based on a monoexponential model with the response variable on a logarithmic scale, sugammadex 0.56 mg/kg may be sufficient to reverse vecuronium-induced shallow residual NMB at a TOF ratio of 0.3 under anesthesia maintained with propofol. Neostigmine may not provide prompt and satisfactory antagonism as sugammadex, even in shallow NMB.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03656614.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no competing interests for this work.

© 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sugammadex and neostigmine dose estimation with a monoexponential model. Recovery time on a linear scale (a and c) or a logarithmic scale (b and d). The points of intersection indicate the dose necessary to reverse a time of flight (TOF) ratio of 0.3–0.9 within 5 min (the lower horizontal line, ln5 = 1.6) and 10 min (the upper horizontal line, ln10 = 2.3) in 95% of patients (red arrow) or in 50% of patients (blue arrow) in both groups. The disadvantage of the linear scale models is evident; the upper 95% curve is too flat to allow an estimation. The prediction formulas are lnΔtdose=0.69+3.0·e‐3.8·dose (sugammadex) and lnΔtdose=1.3+2.5·e‐0.079·dose (neostigmine)

References

    1. Kumar GV, Nair AP, Murthy HS, et al. Residual neuromuscular blockade affects postoperative pulmonary function. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:1234‐1244.
    1. Raval AD, Uyei J, Karabis A, Bash LD, Brull SJ. Incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade and use of neuromuscular blocking agents with or without antagonists: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2020;64:109818.
    1. Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1042‐1048.
    1. Hunter JM. Reversal of residual neuromuscular block: complications associated with perioperative management of muscle relaxation. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:i53‐i62.
    1. Bowman WC. Neuromuscular block. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(Suppl 1):S277‐S286.
    1. Keating GM. Sugammadex: a review of neuromuscular blockade reversal. Drugs. 2016;76:1041‐1052.
    1. Zwiers A, van den Heuvel M, Smeets J, Rutherford S. Assessment of the potential for displacement interactions with sugammadex: a pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic modelling approach. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31:101‐111.
    1. Lee C. Structure, conformation, and action of neuromuscular blocking drugs. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:755‐769.
    1. Raval AD, Anupindi VR, Ferrufino CP, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of residual neuromuscular blockade: A systematic review of observational studies. J Clin Anesth. 2020;66: 109962.
    1. McLean DJ, Diaz‐Gil D, Farhan HN, et al. Dose‐dependent association between intermediate‐acting neuromuscular‐blocking agents and postoperative respiratory complications. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:1201‐1213.
    1. Sasaki N, Meyer MJ, Malviya SA, et al. Effects of neostigmine reversal of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents on postoperative respiratory outcomes: a prospective study. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:959‐968.
    1. Pühringer FK, Gordon M, Demeyer I, et al. Sugammadex rapidly reverses moderate rocuronium‐ or vecuronium‐induced neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a dose‐response relationship. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:610‐619.
    1. Schaller SJ, Fink H, Ulm K, Blobner M. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose‐finding study for reversal of shallow residual neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1054‐1060.
    1. Kaufhold N, Schaller SJ, Stäuble CG, et al. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose‐finding study for reversal of residual neuromuscular block at a train‐of‐four ratio of 0.2 (SUNDRO20). Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:233‐240.
    1. Fuchs‐Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, et al. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789‐808.
    1. Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:W1‐73.
    1. Royston P. Model selection for univariable fractional polynomials. Stata J. 2017;17:619‐629.
    1. Schaller SJ, Lewald H. Clinical pharmacology and efficacy of sugammadex in the reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12:1097‐1108.
    1. Núñez E, Steyerberg EW, Núñez J. Regression modeling strategies. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:501‐507.
    1. Asztalos L, Szabó‐Maák Z, Gajdos A, et al. Reversal of vecuronium‐induced neuromuscular blockade with low‐dose sugammadex at train‐of‐four count of four: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2017;127:441‐449.
    1. Pongrácz A, Szatmári S, Nemes R, Fülesdi B, Tassonyi E. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex at the reappearance of four twitches to train‐of‐four stimulation. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:36‐42.
    1. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, et al. Residual neuromuscular block in the elderly: incidence and clinical implications. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:1322‐1336.
    1. Kent NB, Liang SS, Phillips S, et al. Therapeutic doses of neostigmine, depolarising neuromuscular blockade and muscle weakness in awake volunteers: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomised volunteer study. Anaesthesia. 2018;73: 1079‐1089.
    1. Martyn JA, Fagerlund MJ, Eriksson LI. Basic principles of neuromuscular transmission. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(Suppl 1):1‐9.
    1. Lee S, Ro YJ, Koh WU, Nishiyama T, Yang HS. The neuromuscular effects of rocuronium under sevoflurane‐remifentanil or propofol‐remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized clinical comparative study in an Asian population. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16:65.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren