Undifferentiated connective tissue disease: a seven-center cross-sectional study of 184 patients

C C Vaz, M Couto, D Medeiros, L Miranda, J Costa, P Nero, R Barros, M J Santos, E Sousa, A Barcelos, L Inês, C C Vaz, M Couto, D Medeiros, L Miranda, J Costa, P Nero, R Barros, M J Santos, E Sousa, A Barcelos, L Inês

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical and serological features of a large cohort of patients with antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). Consecutive patients with UCTD, followed up at the Rheumatology Clinic of the participating centers, were included. Data from these patients were obtained by clinical evaluation and chart review. All patients were diagnosed as having UCTD on basis of the following criteria: positive ANA plus at least one clinical feature of connective tissue disease, but not fulfilling classification criteria for any differentiated connective tissue disease. One hundred eighty-four patients were studied (female patients-94.5%; mean age at time of evaluation-47 years). The most prevalent manifestations were arthralgia (66%), arthritis (32%), Raynaud's phenomenon (30%), sicca symptoms (30%), and leukopenia (19%). The prevalence of ANA was 100%, anti-SSA 20%, anti-dsDNA 14%, and anti-SSB 7%. Patients with anti-dsDNA/anti-Sm, anticentromere/anti-Scl70, or anti-SSA/anti-SSB antibodies more frequently presented a set of manifestations close to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, or Sjögren syndrome, respectively. We analyze a large cohort of UCTD. Seventy-two percent of these UCTD patients present lupus-, scleroderma-, or Sjögren-like features but do not fulfill classification criteria and mostly present a mild disease.

References

    1. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2005 May;31(2):245-54, vi
    1. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003 May-Jun;21(3):313-20
    1. J Rheumatol. 2001 Jul;28(7):1573-6
    1. Scand J Rheumatol. 1999;28(1):33-7
    1. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999 Sep-Oct;17(5):615-20
    1. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 16;349(16):1526-33
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 May;23(5):581-90
    1. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999 Sep-Oct;17(5):585-91
    1. J Rheumatol. 1991 Sep;18(9):1340-3
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Mar;36(3):340-7
    1. Lupus. 2000;9(2):110-5
    1. J Rheumatol. 2005 Feb;32(2):213-5
    1. J Rheumatol. 2002 Nov;29(11):2345-9
    1. Clin Rheumatol. 1998;17(3):195-201
    1. J Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;34(9):1855-63
    1. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Jun;4(6):328-32
    1. Lupus. 1998;7(2):95-100
    1. J Rheumatol. 1991 Sep;18(9):1332-9
    1. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1011-23
    1. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001 Jul-Aug;19(4):403-9
    1. J Rheumatol. 1996 Mar;23(3):469-75
    1. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(5):R123
    1. Lupus. 2007;16(6):401-9
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep;40(9):1725
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Jun;61(6):554-8
    1. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Jan;40(1):89-94

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren