Effects of ambient air pollution on symptoms of asthma in Seattle-area children enrolled in the CAMP study

O Yu, L Sheppard, T Lumley, J Q Koenig, G G Shapiro, O Yu, L Sheppard, T Lumley, J Q Koenig, G G Shapiro

Abstract

We observed a panel of 133 children (5-13 years of age) with asthma residing in the greater Seattle, Washington, area for an average of 58 days (range 28-112 days) during screening for enrollment in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) study. Daily self-reports of asthma symptoms were obtained from study diaries and compared with ambient air pollution levels in marginal repeated measures logistic regression models. We defined days with asthma symptoms as any day a child reported at least one mild asthma episode. All analyses were controlled for subject-specific variables [age, race, sex, baseline height, and FEV(1) PC(20) concentration (methacholine provocative concentration required to produce a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec)] and potential time-dependent confounders (day of week, season, and temperature). Because of variable observation periods for participants, we estimated both between- and within-subject air pollutant effects. Our primary interest was in the within-subject effects: the effect of air pollutant excursions from typical levels in each child's observation period on the odds of asthma symptoms. In single-pollutant models, the population average estimates indicated a 30% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11-52%] increase for a 1-ppm increment in carbon monoxide lagged 1 day, an 18% (95% CI, 5-33%) increase for a 10-microg/m(3) increment in same-day particulate matter < 1.0 microm (PM(1.0)), and an 11% (95% CI, 3-20%) increase for a 10-microg/m(3) increment in particulate matter < 10 microm (PM(10)) lagged 1 day. Conditional on the previous day's asthma symptoms, we estimated 25% (95% CI, 10-42%), 14% (95% CI, 4-26%), and 10% (95% CI, 3-16%) increases in the odds of asthma symptoms associated with increases in CO, PM(1.0), and PM(10), respectively. We did not find any association between sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) and the odds of asthma symptoms. In multipollutant models, the separate pollutant effects were smaller. The overall effect of an increase in both CO and PM(1. 0) was a 31% (95% CI, 11-55%) increase in the odds of symptoms of asthma. We conclude that there is an association between change in short-term air pollution levels, as indexed by PM and CO, and the occurrence of asthma symptoms among children in Seattle. Although PM effects on asthma have been found in other studies, it is likely that CO is a marker for vehicle exhaust and other combustion by-products that aggravate asthma.

References

    1. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1999 Nov;49(11):1280-91
    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Oct;104(4 Pt 1):717-22
    1. Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30
    1. Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1049-60
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Sep;144(3 Pt 1):668-74
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Apr;147(4):826-31
    1. Environ Res. 1993 Oct;63(1):26-38
    1. Eur Respir J. 1995 May;8(5):723-8
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):300-7
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Sep 15;144(6):570-81
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;155(6):2105-8
    1. Eur Respir J. 1997 Oct;10(10):2275-8
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;157(4 Pt 1):1034-43
    1. Eur Respir J. 1998 Mar;11(3):677-85
    1. Biometrics. 1998 Jun;54(2):638-45
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Nov;106(11):751-61
    1. Eur Respir J. 1998 Oct;12(4):900-5
    1. Epidemiology. 1999 Jan;10(1):23-30
    1. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Nov;55(11):771-8
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):489-93
    1. Am J Public Health. 1980 Jul;70(7):687-96

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren