Feasibility of data linkage in the PARAMEDIC trial: a cluster randomised trial of mechanical chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Chen Ji, Tom Quinn, Lucia Gavalova, Ranjit Lall, Charlotte Scomparin, Jessica Horton, Charles D Deakin, Helen Pocock, Michael A Smyth, Nigel Rees, Samantha J Brace-McDonnell, Simon Gates, Gavin D Perkins, Chen Ji, Tom Quinn, Lucia Gavalova, Ranjit Lall, Charlotte Scomparin, Jessica Horton, Charles D Deakin, Helen Pocock, Michael A Smyth, Nigel Rees, Samantha J Brace-McDonnell, Simon Gates, Gavin D Perkins

Abstract

Objectives: There is considerable interest in reducing the cost of clinical trials. Linkage of trial data to administrative datasets and disease-specific registries may improve trial efficiency, but it has not been reported in resuscitation trials conducted in the UK. To assess the feasibility of using national administrative and clinical datasets to follow up patients transported to hospital following attempted resuscitation in a cluster randomised trial of a mechanical chest compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods: Hospital data on trial participants were requested from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, and Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project and National Audit of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions, using unique patient identifiers. Linked data were received between June 2014 and June 2015.

Results: Of 4471 patients randomised in the pre-hospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC) trial, 2398 (53.6%) were not known to be deceased at emergency department arrival and were eligible for linkage. We achieved an overall match rate of 86.7% in the combined HES accident and emergency, inpatient and critical care dataset, with variable match rates (4.2%-80.4%) in individual datasets. Patient demographics, cardiac arrest-related characteristics and major outcomes were predominantly similar between HES matched and unmatched groups, in the linkage apart from location, response time and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at handover.

Conclusions: This study shows that it is feasible to track patients from the prehospital setting through to hospital admission using routinely available administrative datasets with a moderate to high degree of success. This approach has the potential to complement the trial data with the demographic and clinical management information about the studied cohort, as well as to improve the efficiency and reduce the costs of follow-up in cardiac arrest trials.

Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN08233942; Post-results.

Keywords: adult cardiology; cardiac arrest; clinical trials; data linkage.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: GDP, RL, TQ, CDD and SG report grants from NIHR HTA Programme during the conduct of the study. The other authors declare no competing interests.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Linkage match rate and flowchart of patients retrieving HES or CMP data. A&E, accident and emergency; CMP, Case Mix Programme; ED, emergency department; HES, Hospital Episodes Statistics; ICNARC, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre; ICU, intensive care unit.

References

    1. Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. . Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S315–67. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000252
    1. Whitehead L, Perkins GD, Clarey A, et al. . A systematic review of the outcomes reported in cardiac arrest clinical trials: the need for a core outcome set. Resuscitation 2015;88:150–7. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.013
    1. Lauer MS, Bonds D. Eliminating the "expensive" adjective for clinical trials. Am Heart J 2014;167:419–20. 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.003
    1. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. . Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1587–97. 10.1056/NEJMoa1308789
    1. James S, Rao SV, Granger CB. Registry-based randomized clinical trials--a new clinical trial paradigm. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015;12:312–6. 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.33
    1. Lauer MS, D’Agostino RB. The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med 2013;369:1579–81. 10.1056/NEJMp1310102
    1. Rao SV, Hess CN, Barham B, et al. . A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:857–67. 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.007
    1. Hofmann R, James SK, Svensson L, et al. . DETermination of the role of OXygen in suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. Am Heart J 2014;167:322–8. 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.022
    1. Perkins GD, Woollard M, Cooke MW, et al. . Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2010;18:58 10.1186/1757-7241-18-58
    1. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, et al. . Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385:947–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9
    1. Ji C, Lall R, Quinn T, et al. . Post-admission outcomes of participants in the PARAMEDIC trial: A cluster randomised trial of mechanical or manual chest compressions. Resuscitation 2017;118:82–8. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.026
    1. Marti J, Hulme C, Ferreira Z, et al. . The cost-effectiveness of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2017;117:1–7. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.04.036
    1. Rajagopal S, Kaye CR, Lall R, et al. . Characteristics of patients who are not resuscitated in out of hospital cardiac arrests and opportunities to improve community response to cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2016;109:110–5. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.014
    1. Herrett E, Smeeth L, Walker L, et al. . The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Heart 2010;96:1264–7. 10.1136/hrt.2009.192328
    1. Ludman PF, de Belder MA, McLenachan JM, et al. . The importance of audit to monitor applications of procedures and improve primary angioplasty results. EuroIntervention 2012;8 Suppl P:P62–P70. 10.4244/EIJV8SPA11
    1. Harrison DA, Brady AR, Rowan K. Case mix, outcome and length of stay for admissions to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care 2004;8:R99–111. 10.1186/cc2834
    1. Boyle MJ. The experience of linking Victorian emergency medical service trauma data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:52 10.1186/1472-6947-8-52
    1. Seymour CW, Kahn JM, Martin-Gill C, et al. . Creating an infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research in emergency medical services. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:599–607. 10.1111/acem.12370
    1. Mears GD, Rosamond WD, Lohmeier C, et al. . A link to improve stroke patient care: a successful linkage between a statewide emergency medical services data system and a stroke registry. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:1398–404. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00925.x
    1. Hettinger AZ, Cushman JT, Shah MN, et al. . Emergency medical dispatch codes association with emergency department outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care 2013;17:29–37. 10.3109/10903127.2012.710716
    1. Barry SJ, Dinnett E, Kean S, et al. . Are routinely collected NHS administrative records suitable for endpoint identification in clinical trials? Evidence from the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. PLoS One 2013;8:e75379 10.1371/journal.pone.0075379
    1. Li G, Sajobi TT, Menon BK, et al. . Registry-based randomized controlled trials- what are the advantages, challenges, and areas for future research? J Clin Epidemiol 2016;80:16–24. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.003
    1. McCowan C; Using routinely collected clinical data to support clinical trials: a view from Scotland. Proceedings from the Clinical Trials Ontario 2015 Clinical Trials Conference 04-05 March. 2015. (accessed 29 Nov 2017).
    1. Filippon J. Slow and costly access to anonymised patient data impedes academic research. BMJ 2015;351:h5087 10.1136/bmj.h5087
    1. Bohensky MA, Jolley D, Sundararajan V, et al. . Data linkage: a powerful research tool with potential problems. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:346 10.1186/1472-6963-10-346

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren