Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study

Lucia Gavalova, Mary Halter, Helen Snooks, Chris P Gale, Clive Weston, Alan Watkins, Scott Munro, Glenn Davies, Chelsey Hampton, Timothy Driscoll, Andy Rosser, Nigel Rees, Sarah Black, Tom Quinn, Lucia Gavalova, Mary Halter, Helen Snooks, Chris P Gale, Clive Weston, Alan Watkins, Scott Munro, Glenn Davies, Chelsey Hampton, Timothy Driscoll, Andy Rosser, Nigel Rees, Sarah Black, Tom Quinn

Abstract

Introduction: Use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found that although PHECG use was associated with improved 30-day survival, a third of patients (typically women, the elderly and those with comorbidities) under EMS care did not receive a PHECG.The overall aim of the PHECG2 study is to update evidence on care and outcomes for patients eligible for PHECG, specifically addressing the following research questions: (1) Is there a difference in 30-day mortality, and in reperfusion rate, between those who do and those who do not receive PHECG? (2) Has the proportion of eligible patients who receive PHECG changed since the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary intervention networks? (3) Are patients that receive PHECG different from those that do not in terms of social and demographic factors, or prehospital clinical presentation? (4) What factors influence EMS clinicians' decisions to perform PHECG?

Methods and analysis: This is an explanatory, mixed-method study comprising four work packages (WPs). WP1 is a population-based, linked-data analysis of a national ACS registry (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project). WP2 is a retrospective chart review of patient records from three large regional EMS. WP3 comprises focus groups of EMS personnel. WP4 will synthesise findings from WP1-3 to inform the development of an intervention to increase PHECG uptake.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (ref: 18LO1679). Findings will be disseminated through feedback to participating EMS, conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: NCT03699137.

Keywords: 12 lead ECG; acute coronary syndrome; emergency medicine; quality of care and outcomes.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CW is clinical lead for MINAP. CPG and TQ are members of the MINAP domain expert group within NICOR.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. . 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Nikolaou NI, Arntz HR, Bellou A, et al. . European resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015 section 8. Initial management of acute coronary syndromes. Resuscitation 2015;95:264–77. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.030
    1. Schiele F, Gale CP, Bonnefoy E, et al. . Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the acute cardiovascular care association. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017;6:34–59. 10.1177/2048872616643053
    1. Tubaro M, Danchin N, Goldstein P, et al. . Pre-Hospital treatment of STEMI patients. A scientific statement of the Working group acute cardiac care of the European Society of cardiology. Acute Card Care 2011;13:56–67. 10.3109/17482941.2011.581292
    1. Quinn T, Johnsen S, Gale CP, et al. . Effects of pre-hospital 12-lead ECG on processes of care and mortality in acute coronary syndrome: a linked cohort study from the myocardial ischaemia national audit project. Heart 2014;100:944–50. 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304599
    1. Curtis JP, Portnay EL, Wang Y, et al. . The pre-hospital electrocardiogram and time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 2000-2002: findings from the National Registry of myocardial Infarction-4. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1544–52. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.077
    1. Diercks DB, Kontos MC, Chen AY, et al. . Utilization and impact of pre-hospital electrocardiograms for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from the NCDR (national cardiovascular data registry) ACTION (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:161–6. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.030
    1. Ducas RA, Labos C, Allen D, et al. . Association of pre-hospital ECG administration with clinical outcomes in ST-segment myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 2016;32:1531–41. 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.06.004
    1. Klerdal K, Varenhorst C, James S, et al. . Sex as a determinant of prehospital ECG in ST- and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients. Heart 2014;100:1817–8. 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306412
    1. Coventry LL, Finn J, Bremner AP. Sex differences in symptom presentation in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung 2011;40:477–91. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.05.001
    1. Cioffi J. A study of the use of past experiences in clinical decision making in emergency situations. Int J Nurs Stud 2001;38:591–9. 10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00096-1
    1. Croskerry P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:1184–204. 10.1197/aemj.9.11.1184
    1. Hall KH. Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education. Med Educ 2002;36:216–24. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01140.x
    1. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185:1124–31. 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
    1. Porter A, Snooks H, Youren A, et al. . "Covering our backs": ambulance crews' attitudes towards clinical documentation when emergency (999) patients are not conveyed to hospital. Emerg Med J 2008;25:292–5. 10.1136/emj.2007.050443
    1. Snooks HA, Kearsley N, Dale J, et al. . Gaps between policy, protocols and practice: a qualitative study of the views and practice of emergency ambulance staff concerning the care of patients with non-urgent needs. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:251–7. 10.1136/qshc.2004.012195
    1. O'Hara R, Johnson M, Siriwardena AN, et al. . A qualitative study of systemic influences on paramedic decision making: care transitions and patient safety. J Health Serv Res Policy 2015;20:45–53. 10.1177/1355819614558472
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: acute management. Clinical guideline [CG167], 2013.
    1. Medical Research Council Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance, 2006. Available: [Accessed June 2017].
    1. Creswell J, Clark PV. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd edn Sage, 2006.
    1. Herrett E, Smeeth L, Walker L, et al. . The myocardial ischaemia national audit project (MINAP). Heart 2010;96:1264–7. 10.1136/hrt.2009.192328
    1. Kaji AH, Schriger D, Green S. Looking through the retrospectoscope: reducing bias in emergency medicine chart review studies. Ann Emerg Med 2014;64:292–8. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.025
    1. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CMN. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, 2013.
    1. NVIVO Available: [Accessed 30 July 2019].

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren