Mini-open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Suture Anchor

Christopher Arena, Aman Dhawan, Christopher Arena, Aman Dhawan

Abstract

The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is a potential source of shoulder pain encountered by orthopaedic surgeons. A multitude of approaches to addressing LHB tendinopathy have been described. These include various surgical techniques such as tenodesis versus tenotomy, an arthroscopic versus an open approach, and differing methods of tenodesis fixation. Our preferred approach to addressing LHB tendinopathy is through a mini-open approach using a double-loaded 4.5-mm suture anchor. This Technical Note with accompanying video describes our technique for performing this procedure, as well as supporting clinical evidence and technical pearls.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
The patient is in the beach-chair position with the operative extremity secured distally in a sterile limb-positioning device. The left anterior shoulder is depicted and relevant surface anatomy highlighted. A 3-cm longitudinal incision is made over the anterior arm at the level of the pectoralis major tendon.
Fig 2
Fig 2
The left anterior shoulder is depicted with the patient in the beach chair position. The fascia immediately inferior to the pectoralis major (PM) tendon is incised 2 cm proximally and distally. The PM tendon is bluntly separated from the biceps brachii and retracted superiorly. Next, the tenotomized long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is retrieved from the incision as shown.
Fig 3
Fig 3
The left anterior shoulder is depicted with the patient in the beach chair position. Two double-bent Homan retractors are placed both laterally and medially across the humerus subperiosteally. A long head of the biceps tendon docking point is selected over the midline anterior humerus 2 cm distal to the pectoralis major tendon along the bicipital groove. A 3.5-mm drill is used to make a unicortical pilot hole in the anterior humerus, followed by a 4.5-mm tap and hand placement of a 4.5-mm Healicoil open-architecture PEEK (polyether ether ketone) double-loaded suture anchor.
Fig 4
Fig 4
The long head of the biceps tendon retrieved from the wound of the anterior shoulder (left is depicted) is evaluated and marked at the proximal and distal borders of the musculotendinous junction (MTJ) with a sterile marking pen.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Intraoperative and artist depictions of a left anterior shoulder. The previously marked borders of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon musculotendinous junction (MTJ) serve as the boundaries for suture location. A free needle is used to pass 3 running Krackow stitches of suture A through the lateral aspect of the LHB tendon from the anatomic anterior-to-posterior direction, progressing from proximally to distally. Suture B is passed in a similar locking Krackow fashion over the medial LHB tendon, thus securing both strands of the double-loaded suture anchor to the MTJ of the LHB tendon.
Fig 6
Fig 6
The ends of sutures A and B are tied together and cut after both Krackow stitches are completed to form knot 1, as shown at the anatomic posterior and distal portion of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon musculotendinous junction. The remaining ends of the corresponding suture strands of sutures A and B of the double-loaded suture anchor are passed through the Krackow running stitches from the anatomic posterior-to-anterior direction in the LHB tendon.
Fig 7
Fig 7
The left anterior shoulder is depicted with the patient in the beach chair position. The diseased proximal portion of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is excised with scissors at the proximal aspect of the musculotendinous junction border.
Fig 8
Fig 8
The left anterior shoulder is depicted with the patient in the beach chair position. The remaining suture ends of sutures A and B are used to parachute the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon into the wound back into the anatomic position and secured to the suture anchor docking site by tying the previously passed sutures on the anterior surface of the LHB tendon, creating knot 2.

References

    1. Churgay C.A. Diagnosis and treatment of biceps tendinitis and tendinosis. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80:470–476.
    1. Mazzocca A.D., Noerdlinger M.A., Romeo A.A. Mini open and sub pectoral biceps tenodesis. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2003;11:24–31.
    1. Scully W.F., Wilson D.J., Grassbaugh J.A., Branstetter J.G., Marchant B.G., Arrington E.D. A simple surgical technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a double-loaded suture anchor. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2:e191–e196.
    1. Romeo AA, Mazzocca AD, Provencher MT. Surgical technique: Arthroscopic and subpectoral long head of biceps tenodesis. Orthop Today. . Published November 2007. Accessed February 1, 2017.
    1. Scheibel M., Schroder R., Chen J., Bartsch M. Arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis versus bony fixation anchor tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1046–1052.
    1. Mazzocca A.D., Rios C.G., Romeo A.A., Arciero R.A. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:896.e1–896.e7.
    1. Mazzocca A.D., Bicos J., Santangel S., Romeo A.A., Arciero R.A. The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1296–1306.
    1. Millett P.J., Sanders B., Gobezie R., Braun S., Warner J.J. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: Does it matter? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:121.
    1. Tashjian R.Z., Henninger H.B. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: Dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:1408–1412.
    1. Dein E.J., Huri G., Gordon J.C., McFarland E.G. A humerus fracture in a baseball pitcher after biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:877–879.
    1. LaFrance R., Madsen W., Yaseen Z., Giordano B., Maloney M., Voloshin I. Relevant anatomic landmarks and measurements for biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1395–1399.
    1. Sethi P.M., Vadasdi K., Greene R.T., Vitale M.A., Duong M., Miller S.R. Safety of open suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis: An anatomic assessment of risk for neurologic injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:138–142.
    1. Arrigoni P., Brady P.C., Burkhart S.S. The double-pulley technique for double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:675.e1–675.e4.
    1. Werner B.C., Pehlivan H.C., Hart J.M. Increased incidence of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic compared with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:1075–1084.
    1. Snir N., Hamula M., Wolfson T., Laible C., Sherman O. Long head of biceps tenodesis with cortical button technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2:e95–e97.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren