Evaluation of a Physical health plan for people with psychosis: a protocol for a quality improvement study

Julie Williams, Nick Sevdalis, Fiona Gaughran, Julie Williams, Nick Sevdalis, Fiona Gaughran

Abstract

Background: People with serious mental illness (SMI) have poorer physical health and reduced lifespans compared to the general population. Reasons for this are complex, but one important area is the identification and treatment of physical health conditions. In England, services are structured into primary and secondary care; physical and mental secondary health services are separate. This often leads to a lack of co-ordination of care, with people missing the screening and treatment they need. People with SMI may find accessing physical health services more difficult due to the impact of their symptoms and/or a lack of social support. When they do access physical care, there may be 'diagnostic overshadowing' where physical health concerns are put down to a mental health diagnosis. Creating tools to support people with SMI to assume more control of their physical health may help to ameliorate some of these problems. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of a service user-held Physical health plan (PHP) for secondary mental health service users to determine whether its use increases uptake of physical health services.

Methods: We will undertake a pilot quality improvement (QI) study to test the use of the PHP. The development of the PHP is described. A Theory of Change (ToC) has been developed which we will test to understand how the PHP is used, using focus groups at the beginning of the study. We will then pilot the use of the PHP for 6 months in two community mental health teams to find out how people use it, what actions are taken, and if it increases uptake of physical health care. We will use the RE-AIM implementation framework to guide the evaluation. After the pilot, we will undertake interviews with service users and clinical staff to elicit their views on using the PHP.

Discussion: This study uses QI methodology and an implementation framework to test a novel intervention for people with SMI. If successful, the intervention will support people with SMI to access physical health services. The study will inform the design of a larger-scale definitive RCT.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03178279. Registered date: 05/06/2017.

Keywords: Mental health services; Physical health; Psychotic disorders; Quality improvement.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval for this study has been given by the Westminster Research Ethics Committee, ref: 17/LO/0831. Participants will be asked to give written informed consent by a researcher after being given time to read the patient information sheet and being given time to ask any questions.Not applicableNS is the director of London Safety and Training Solutions Ltd, which provides training and advisory services to healthcare organisations and training programmes globally. FG has received support or honoraria for CME, has advisory work and lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Roche, and Sunovion, and has a family member with professional links to Lilly and GSK, including shares. FG is in part funded by the National Institute for Health Research’s (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, by the South London Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Funding scheme, and by the Maudsley Charity.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PHP process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Theory of Change for the present study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PHP study schedule of enrolment and assessments

References

    1. Baxter A, Harris M, Khatib Y, Brugha T, Bien H, Bhui K. Reducing excess mortality due to chronic disease in people with severe mental illness: meta-review of health interventions. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:322–329. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.163170.
    1. Cunningham C, Peters K, Mannix J. Physical health inequities in people with severe mental illness: identifying initiatives for practice change. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2013;34(12):855–862.SSS
    1. Crawford MJ, Jayakumar S, Lemmey SJ, Zalewska K, Patel MX, Cooper SJ, et al. Assessment and treatment of physical health problems among people with schizophrenia: national cross-sectional study. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 2014;205(6):473–477. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142521.
    1. Lawrence D, Kisely S. Inequalities in healthcare provision for people with severe mental illness. J Psychopharmacol. 2010;24(11):61–68. doi: 10.1177/1359786810382058.
    1. Shefer G, Henderson C, Howard L, Murray J, Thornicroft G. Diagnostic overshadowing and other challenges involved in the diagnostic process of patients with mental illness who present in emergency departments with physical symptoms – a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111682.
    1. De Hert M, Corell C, Bobes J, Cetkovich-Bakmas M, Cohen D, Asai I, et al. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(1):52–77. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00014.x.
    1. Geiss M, Chamberlain M, Weaver T, McCormick C, Raufer A, Scoggins L, et al. Diagnostic overshadowing of the psychiatric population in the emergency department: physiological factors identified for an early warning system. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2017;1(5):1–5.
    1. Happell B, Platania-Phung C, Scott D. What determines whether nurses provide physica health care to consumers with serious mental illness? Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014;28:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.11.001.
    1. Yeomans D, Dale K, Beedle K. Systematic computerised cardiovascular health screening for people with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Bull (2014) 2014;38(6):280–284. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045955.
    1. Blythe J, White J. Role of the mental health nurse towards physical health care in serious mental illness: an integrative review of 10 years of UK literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2012;21(3):193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00792.x.
    1. Happell B, Scott D, Platania-Phung C. Perceptions of barriers to physical health care for people with serious mental illness: a review of the international literature. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012;33(11):752–761. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2012.708099.
    1. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Report of the second round of the National Audit of Schizophrenia. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2014.
    1. McGuinness H, Follan M. Severe mental illness and physical health care. J Ment Health Nurs. 2016;5(2):81. doi: 10.12968/bjmh.2016.5.2.81.
    1. Kemp V, Fisher C, Lawn S, Battersby M, Isaac M. Small steps: barriers and facilitators to physical health self-management by people living with mental illness. Int J Ment Health Promot. 2014;16(4):216–230. doi: 10.1080/14623730.2014.931069.
    1. Naylor C, Imison C, Addicott R, Buck D, Goodwin N, Harrison T, et al. Transforming our health care system: ten priorities for commissioners. London: King’s Fund; 2015.
    1. Cook J, Copeland M, Jonikas J, Hamilton M, Razzano L, Grey D, et al. Results of a randomized controlled trial of mental illness self-management using wellness recovery action planning. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:12. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr012.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337(1655):a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
    1. Campbell J, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmouth A, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J. 2000;321(7262):694–695. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.
    1. Rethink. Physical Health Check. 2014. Available at: .
    1. Rayner, L. Matcham, F. Hutton, J. Stringer, C. Dobson, J. Steer, S. Hotopf, M. Embedding integrated mentla health assessment and management in general hospital settings: feasibility, acceptability and the prevalence of common mental disorder. General Hospital Psychitry. 2014;36(3)318–24.
    1. De Silva M, Breuer E, Lee L, Asher L, Chowdhary N, Lund C, et al. Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials. 2014;15(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-267.
    1. Glasgow R, Vogt V, Boles S. Evaluating the public health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.
    1. Milat, A. Li, B. Narrative review of frameworks for translating research evidence into policy and practice. Public Helath Research and Practice. 2017;27(1)e2711704.
    1. Department of Health . Caring for people. The Care Programme Approach for people with a mental illness referred to specialist mental health services. London: Department of Health; 1990.
    1. Breuer E, De Silva M, Fekuda A, Luitel N, Murhar L, Nakku J, Petersen I, Lund C. Using workshops to develop theories of change in five low and middle income countires: lessons from the programme for improving mental health care (PRIME). Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2014;8(15):1-13.
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 1):1918–1930. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
    1. Robson D, Haddad M. Mental health nurses’ attitudes towards the physical health care of people with severe and enduring mental illness: the development of a measurement tool. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(1):72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.011.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Liu N, Daumit G, Dua T, Aquila R, Charlson F, Cuijpers P, et al. Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:30–40. doi: 10.1002/wps.20384.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren