Lessons from the mixed-meal tolerance test: use of 90-minute and fasting C-peptide in pediatric diabetes

Rachel E J Besser, Beverley M Shields, Rosaura Casas, Andrew T Hattersley, Johnny Ludvigsson, Rachel E J Besser, Beverley M Shields, Rosaura Casas, Andrew T Hattersley, Johnny Ludvigsson

Abstract

Objective: Mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) area under the curve C-peptide (AUC CP) is the gold-standard measure of endogenous insulin secretion in type 1 diabetes but is intensive and invasive to perform. The 90-min MMTT-stimulated CP ≥0.2 nmol/L (90CP) is related to improved clinical outcomes, and CP ≥0.1 nmol/L is the equivalent fasting measure (FCP). We assessed whether 90CP or FCP are alternatives to a full MMTT.

Research design and methods: CP was measured during 1,334 MMTTs in 421 type 1 diabetes patients aged <18 years at 3, 9, 18, 48, and 72 months duration. We assessed: 1) correlation between mean AUC CP and 90CP or FCP; 2) sensitivity and specificity of 90CP ≥0.2 nmol/L and FCP ≥ 0.1 nmol/L to detect peak CP ≥0.2 nmol/L and the equivalent AUC CP; and 3) how the time taken to reach the CP peak varied with age of diagnosis and diabetes duration.

Results: AUC CP was highly correlated to 90CP (r(s) = 0.96; P < 0.0001) and strongly correlated to FCP (r(s) = 0.84; P < 0.0001). AUC CP ≥23 nmol/L/150 min was the equivalent cutoff for peak CP ≥0.2 nmol/L (98% sensitivity/97% specificity). A 90CP ≥0.2 nmol/L correctly classified 96% patients using AUC or peak CP, whereas FCP ≥0.1 nmol/L classified 83 and 85% patients, respectively. There was only a small difference seen between peak and 90CP (median 0.02 nmol/L). The CP peak occurred earlier in patients with longer diabetes duration (6.1 min each 1-year increase in duration) and younger age (2.5 min each 1-year increase).

Conclusions: 90CP is a highly sensitive and specific measure of AUC and peak CP in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and offers a practical alternative to a full MMTT.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between mean AUC CP and mean 90-min–stimulated serum CP (rs = 0.96) (A) and mean FCP (rs = 0.84) (B) during a 150-min MMTT (n = 421).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timing and magnitude of the CP peak during 150-min MMTT, split by age of diagnosis tertiles (n = 141; 10–13 years [light gray bar], n = 139; and ≥13 years [dark gray bar], n = 141). A: The CP peak occurs earlier with increasing diabetes duration and younger age of diagnosis (1,334 MMTTs in 421 patients). B: Peak CP values reduce with increasing diabetes duration and are lower in younger patients (1,334 MMTTs in 421 patients).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival plots to show the impact of FCP (A) and age at diagnosis (B) on the time taken for patients to become insulin deficient (peak CP <0.2 nmol/L). A: FCP is divided by tertiles, in which dashed black line refers to FCP <0.17 nmol/L, solid black line refers to FCP 0.17–0.29 nmol/L, and dashed gray line refers to FCP ≥0.29 nmol/L. Current duration is used in the cases of censored data (+) in which last recorded peak CP is >0.2 nmol/L). B: Age of diagnosis is divided by tertiles, in which dashed black line refers to age <10 years, solid black line refers to age 10–13 years, and dashed gray line refers to age ≥13 years. Current duration is used in the cases of censored data (+) in which last recorded peak CP is >0.2 nmol/L).

References

    1. Greenbaum CJ, Harrison LC, Immunology of Diabetes Society Guidelines for intervention trials in subjects with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2003;52:1059–1065
    1. Palmer JP, Fleming GA, Greenbaum CJ, et al. C-peptide is the appropriate outcome measure for type 1 diabetes clinical trials to preserve beta-cell function: report of an ADA workshop, 21-22 October 2001. Diabetes 2004;53:250–264
    1. Greenbaum CJ, Mandrup-Poulsen T, McGee PF, et al. Type 1 Diabetes Trial Net Research Group. European C-Peptide Trial Study Group Mixed-meal tolerance test versus glucagon stimulation test for the assessment of beta-cell function in therapeutic trials in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1966–1971
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trial. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:517–523
    1. The DCCT Research Group Effects of age, duration and treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus on residual beta-cell function: observations during eligibility testing for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987;65:30–36
    1. Daneman D, Clarson C. Residual beta-cell function in children with type 1 diabetes: measurement and impact on glycemic control. Clin Invest Med 1987;10:484–487
    1. Gjessing HJ, Matzen LE, Frøland A, Faber OK. Correlations between fasting plasma C-peptide, glucagon-stimulated plasma C-peptide, and urinary C-peptide in insulin-treated diabetics. Diabetes Care 1987;10:487–490
    1. Hendriksen C, Faber OK, Drejer J, Binder C. Prevalence of residual B-cell function in insulin-treated diabetics evaluated by the plasma C-etide response to intravenous glucagon. Diabetologia 1977;13:615–619
    1. Faber OK, Binder C. C-peptide response to glucagon. A test for the residual beta-cell function in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1977;26:605–610
    1. Garcia-Webb P, Bonser A, Welborn TA. Correlation between fasting serum C-peptide and B cell insulin secretory capacity in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1982;22:296.
    1. Heding LG. Radioimmunological determination of human C-peptide in serum. Diabetologia 1975;11:541–548
    1. Greenbaum CJ, Anderson AM, Dolan LM, et al. SEARCH Study Group Preservation of beta-cell function in autoantibody-positive youth with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1839–1844
    1. Komulainen J, Kulmala P, Savola K, et al. Clinical, autoimmune, and genetic characteristics of very young children with type 1 diabetes. Childhood Diabetes in Finland (DiMe) Study Group. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1950–1955
    1. Mortensen HB, Swift PG, Holl RW, et al. Hvidoere Study Group on Childhood Diabetes Multinational study in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: association of age, ketoacidosis, HLA status, and autoantibodies on residual beta-cell function and glycemic control 12 months after diagnosis. Pediatr Diabetes 2010;11:218–226
    1. Lazar L, Ofan R, Weintrob N, et al. Heat-shock protein peptide DiaPep277 treatment in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind phase II study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2007;23:286–291
    1. Raz I, Avron A, Tamir M, et al. Treatment of new-onset type 1 diabetes with peptide DiaPep277 is safe and associated with preserved beta-cell function: extension of a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2007;23:292–298
    1. Ludvigsson J, Faresjö M, Hjorth M, et al. GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1909–1920
    1. Steele C, Hagopian WA, Gitelman S, et al. Insulin secretion in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2004;53:426–433
    1. Bonfanti R, Bazzigaluppi E, Calori G, et al. Parameters associated with residual insulin secretion during the first year of disease in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1998;15:844–850
    1. Wallensteen M, Dahlquist G, Persson B, et al. Factors influencing the magnitude, duration, and rate of fall of B-cell function in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic children followed for two years from their clinical diagnosis. Diabetologia 1988;31:664–669
    1. Ludvigsson J, Heding LG, Larsson Y, Leander E. C-peptide in juvenile diabetics beyond the postinitial remission period. Relation to clinical manifestations at onset of diabetes, remission and diabetic control. Acta Paediatr Scand 1977;66:177–184
    1. Greenbaum C, Seidel K, Pihoker C. The case for intravenous arginine stimulation in lieu of mixed-meal tolerance tests as outcome measure for intervention studies in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1202–1204
    1. Madsbad S, Sauerbrey N, Møller-Jensen B, Krarup T, Kühl C. Outcome of the glucagon test depends upon the prevailing blood glucose concentration in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Acta Med Scand 1987;222:71–74
    1. Ludvigsson J. Methodological aspects on C-peptide measurements. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1983;671:53–59
    1. Gjessing HJ, Reinholdt B, Faber OK, Pedersen O. The effect of acute hyperglycemia on the plasma C-peptide response to intravenous glucagon or to a mixed meal in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1991;124:556–562
    1. Arnold-Larsen S, Madsbad S, Kühl C. Reproducibility of the glucagon test. Diabet Med 1987;4:299–303
    1. Rönnemaa T. Practical aspects in performing the glucagon test in the measurement of C-peptide secretion in diabetic patients. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1986;46:345–349
    1. Mirel RD, Ginsberg-Fellner F, Horwitz DL, Rayfield EJ. C-Peptide reserve in insulin-dependent diabetes. Comparative responses to glucose, glucagon and tolbutamide. Diabetologia 1980;19:183–188
    1. Törn C, Landin-Olsson M, Lernmark A, et al. Prognostic factors for the course of beta cell function in autoimmune diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:4619–4623
    1. Schiffrin A, Suissa S, Weitzner G, Poussier P, Lalla D. Factors predicting course of beta-cell function in IDDM. Diabetes Care 1992;15:997–1001
    1. Knip M, Ilonen J, Mustonen A, Akerblom HK. Evidence of an accelerated B-cell destruction in HLA-Dw3/Dw4 heterozygous children with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetologia 1986;29:347–351
    1. Decochez K, Keymeulen B, Somers G, et al. Belgian Diabetes Registry Use of an islet cell antibody assay to identify type 1 diabetic patients with rapid decrease in C-peptide levels after clinical onset. Belgian Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1072–1078
    1. Peig M, Gomis R, Ercilla G, Casamitjana R, Bottazzo GF, Pujol-Borrell R. Correlation between residual beta-cell function and islet cell antibodies in newly diagnosed type I diabetes. Follow-up study. Diabetes 1989;38:1396–1401
    1. Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Tennill AL, et al. Standardization of C-peptide measurements. Clin Chem 2008;54:1023–1026

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren