Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial

Scott S Tykodi, Lucio N Gordan, Robert S Alter, Edward Arrowsmith, Michael R Harrison, Ivor Percent, Rakesh Singal, Peter Van Veldhuizen, Daniel J George, Thomas Hutson, Joshua Zhang, Jesus Zoco, Jennifer L Johansen, Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty, Scott S Tykodi, Lucio N Gordan, Robert S Alter, Edward Arrowsmith, Michael R Harrison, Ivor Percent, Rakesh Singal, Peter Van Veldhuizen, Daniel J George, Thomas Hutson, Joshua Zhang, Jesus Zoco, Jennifer L Johansen, Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty

Abstract

Background: CheckMate 920 (NCT02982954) is a multicohort, phase 3b/4 clinical trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment in predominantly US community-based patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clinical features mostly excluded from phase 3 trials. We report safety and efficacy results from the advanced non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) cohort of CheckMate 920.

Methods: Patients with previously untreated advanced/metastatic nccRCC, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and any International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk received up to four doses of nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for ≤2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS; both investigator-assessed), time to response (TTR), and duration of response (DOR), all using RECIST V.1.1. Overall survival (OS) was exploratory.

Results: Fifty-two patients with nccRCC (unclassified histology, 42.3%; papillary, 34.6%; chromophobe, 13.5%; translocation-associated, 3.8%; collecting duct, 3.8%; renal medullary, 1.9%) received treatment. With 24.1 months minimum study follow-up, median duration of therapy (range) was 3.5 (0.0-25.8) months for nivolumab and 2.1 (0.0-3.9) months for ipilimumab. Median (range) number of doses received was 4.5 (1-28) for nivolumab and 4.0 (1-4) for ipilimumab. Grade 3-4 immune-mediated AEs were diarrhea/colitis (7.7%), rash (5.8%), nephritis and renal dysfunction (3.8%), hepatitis (1.9%), adrenal insufficiency (1.9%), and hypophysitis (1.9%). No grade 5 immune-mediated AEs occurred. ORR (n=46) was 19.6% (95% CI 9.4 to 33.9). Two patients achieved complete response (papillary, n=1; unclassified, n=1), seven achieved partial response (papillary, n=4; unclassified, n=3), and 17 had stable disease. Median TTR was 2.8 (range 2.1-14.8) months. Median DOR was not reached (range 0.0+-27.8+); eight of nine responders remain without reported progression. Median PFS (n=52) was 3.7 (95% CI 2.7 to 4.6) months. Median OS (n=52) was 21.2 (95% CI 16.6 to not estimable) months.

Conclusions: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced nccRCC showed no new safety signals and encouraging antitumor activity.

Trial registration number: NCT02982954.

Keywords: combination; drug therapy; immunotherapy; kidney neoplasms; urologic neoplasms.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. SST reports consulting or advisory role from Merck, Intellisphere, Natera, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and Exelixis; patent pending (institution); and research funding (all institution) from Genentech, BMS, Merck, Calithera Biosciences, Pfizer, Jounce Therapeutics, Nektar, Exelixis, and Clinigen Group. LNG reports employment from Florida Medical Clinic; leadership from Florida Cancer Specialists; honoraria from Ameris Pharma; consulting or advisory role from Janssen Oncology; and speakers bureau from Myriad Genetics. RSA reports consulting or advisory role from Eisai, Bayer, Janssen Biotech, EMD Serono; and speakers bureau from Astellas Pharma, Janssen Oncology, Bayer, and Pfizer. EA reports employment from Tennessee Oncology; travel accommodation, expenses from Flatiron Health, OneOncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute; other relationship from Sarah Cannon Research Institute; stock or other ownership interests from OneOncology; and research funding (all institution) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Cephalon, Chorus, Cougar Biotechnology, Eisai, EMD Serono, Evelo Biosciences, Exelixis, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Merck, Millennium, Modra Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, OncoGenex, Onyx, Pelton Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Takeda, Clovis Oncology, Lilly, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Research & Development. MRH reports consulting or advisory role from Bayer, Exelixis, Genentech, Fujifilm, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and BMS; speakers bureau from Genentech and Exelixis; and research funding (all institution) from BMS, Genentech, Pfizer, Merck, Clovis Oncology, Acerta Pharma, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Exelixis, and Seattle Genetics. IP has nothing to disclose. RS reports consulting or advisory role from Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Scientific Affairs, and Dendreon. PVV reports honoraria from Sanofi. DJG reports consulting or advisory role from Bayer, Exelixis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, BMS, Genentech, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Myovant Sciences, AstraZeneca, Michael J Hennessy Associates, Propella Therapeutics (formerly Vizuri), Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Flatiron, Modra Pharmaceuticals, Physician Education Resource, and RevHealth; leadership from Capio Biosciences; speakers bureau from Sanofi, Bayer, and Exelixis; travel, accommodations, expenses from Bayer, Exelixis, Sanofi, UroToday; honoraria from Sanofi, Bayer, Exelixis, EMD Serono, OncLive, Pfizer, UroToday, American Association for Cancer Research, Axess Oncology, Janssen Oncology, Millennium Medical Publication, Ipsen, and UroGPO; and research funding (all institution) from Exelixis, Janssen Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, BMS, Calithera Biosciences, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi/Aventis. TH reports employment from Texas Oncology; consulting or advisory role from Bayer/Onyx, Pfizer, Novartis, Astellas Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Eisai, and Exelixis; speakers bureau from Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Eisai, Exelixis, Astella Pharma, and BMS; honoraria from Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, BMS, Exelixis, Eisai, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, and Bayer/Onyx; and research funding (all institution) from Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Exelixis, Eisai, and BMS. JZh reports employment and stock ownership from BMS. JZo reports employment and consulting or advisory role from Syneos Health. JLJ reports employment and stock ownership from BMS. ARK reports remuneration for a consulting or advisory role from Exelixis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, BMS, and EMD Serono; speakers bureau from Janssen, Astellas Medivation, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, Genentech/Roche, Eisai, AstraZeneca, BMS, Amgen, Exelixis, EMD Serono, Merck, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, Gilead, and Myovant; travel, accommodations and expenses from Genentech, Prometheus, Astellas Medivation, Janssen, Eisai, Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis, Exelixis, and AstraZeneca; stock ownership from ECOM Medical; and research funding (all institution) from Genentech, Exelixis, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, MacroGenics, Astellas Pharma, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, BioClin Therapeutics, Clovis Oncology, Bavarian Nordic, Seattle Genetics, Immunomedics, and Epizyme.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier plot of PFS per investigator assessment in all treated patients. PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plot of OS in all treated patients. NE, not estimable; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Lipworth L, Morgans AK, Edwards TL, et al. . Renal cell cancer histological subtype distribution differs by race and sex. BJU Int 2016;117:260–5. 10.1111/bju.12950
    1. Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Crispen PL, et al. . Histological subtype is an independent predictor of outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2010;183:1309–16. 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.035
    1. Moch H, Gasser T, Amin MB, et al. . Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: a Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 2000;89:604–14. 10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<604::AID-CNCR16>;2-Q
    1. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, et al. . The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 2016;70:93–105. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029
    1. Ahrens M, Scheich S, Hartmann A, et al. . Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma - pathology and treatment options. Oncol Res Treat 2019;42:128–35. 10.1159/000495366
    1. Gulati S, Philip E, Salgia S, et al. . Evolving treatment paradigm in metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020;23:100172. 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100172
    1. Vera-Badillo FE, Templeton AJ, Duran I, et al. . Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015;67:740–9. 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.010
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . Kidney cancer version 3, 2022. Available: [Accessed 5 Nov 2021].
    1. Kroeger N, Xie W, Lee J-L, et al. . Metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy agents: characterization of survival outcome and application of the International mRCC database consortium criteria. Cancer 2013;119:2999–3006. 10.1002/cncr.28151
    1. Hutson TE, Michaelson MD, Kuzel TM, et al. . A single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study of lenvatinib plus everolimus in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2021;80:162–70. 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.015
    1. Vogelzang NJ, Olsen MR, McFarlane JJ, et al. . Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 374 study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020;18:461–8. 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.006
    1. Koshkin VS, Barata PC, Zhang T, et al. . Clinical activity of nivolumab in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6:9. 10.1186/s40425-018-0319-9
    1. McDermott DF, Lee J-L, Ziobro M, et al. . Open-label, single-arm, phase II study of pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:1029–39. 10.1200/JCO.20.02365
    1. McGregor BA, McKay RR, Braun DA, et al. . Results of a multicenter phase II study of atezolizumab and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with variant histology and/or sarcomatoid features. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:63–70. 10.1200/JCO.19.01882
    1. Powles T, Larkin JMG, Patel P, et al. . A phase II study investigating the safety and efficacy of savolitinib and durvalumab in metastatic papillary renal cancer (CALYPSO). J Clin Oncol 2019;37:545. 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.545
    1. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1277–90. 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126
    1. Motzer RJ, Rini BI, McDermott DF, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:1370–85. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30413-9
    1. Albiges L, Tannir NM, Burotto M, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial. ESMO Open 2020;5:e001079. 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-001079
    1. OPDIVO (nivolumab) [package insert]. Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 2021.
    1. European Medicines Agency . OPDIVO, summary of product characteristics. Available: [Accessed 27 Jul 2021].
    1. McKay RR, Bossé D, Xie W, et al. . The clinical activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Res 2018;6:758–65. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0475
    1. Gupta R, Ornstein MC, Li H, et al. . Clinical activity of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020;18:429–35. 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.012
    1. Emamekhoo H, Olsen MR, Carthon BC, et al. . Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases: CheckMate 920. Cancer 202110.1002/cncr.34016
    1. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 1934;26:404–13. 10.1093/biomet/26.4.404
    1. Brookmeyer R, Crowley J. A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics 1982;38:29–41. 10.2307/2530286
    1. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81. 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
    1. Escudier B, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. . CheckMate 214: efficacy and safety of nivolumab + ipilimumab (N+I) V sunitinib (S) for treatment-naïve advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), including IMDC risk and PD-L1 expression subgroups. Annals of Oncology 2017;28:v621–2. 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.029
    1. Buonerba C, Dolce P, Iaccarino S, et al. . Outcomes associated with first-line anti-PD-1/ PD-L1 agents vs. sunitinib in patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers 2020;1210.3390/cancers12020408
    1. Armstrong AJ, Halabi S, Eisen T, et al. . Everolimus versus sunitinib for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ASPEN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:378–88. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00515-X
    1. Tannir NM, Jonasch E, Albiges L, et al. . Everolimus versus sunitinib prospective evaluation in metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ESPN): a randomized multicenter phase 2 trial. Eur Urol 2016;69:866–74. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.049
    1. Martín A, Puente J, Pinto A, et al. . Real-world outcome of 173 metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) cases: the experience of the center group for genitourinary tumors. Kidney Cancer 2019;3:41–50. 10.3233/KCA-180045
    1. Chahoud J, Msaouel P, Campbell MT, et al. . Nivolumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): a single-institutional experience and literature meta-analysis. Oncologist 2020;25:252–8. 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0372
    1. Tannir NM, Arén Frontera O, Hammers HJ, et al. . Thirty-month follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial of first-line nivolumab + ipilimumab (N+I) or sunitinib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). J Clin Oncol 2019;37:547. 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.547
    1. Pal SK, Tangen C, Thompson IM, et al. . A comparison of sunitinib with cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2021;397:695–703. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00152-5

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren