System-agnostic clinical decision support services: benefits and challenges for scalable decision support

Kensaku Kawamoto, Guilherme Del Fiol, Charles Orton, David F Lobach, Kensaku Kawamoto, Guilherme Del Fiol, Charles Orton, David F Lobach

Abstract

System-agnostic clinical decision support (CDS) services provide patient evaluation capabilities that are independent of specific CDS systems and system implementation contexts. While such system-agnostic CDS services hold great potential for facilitating the widespread implementation of CDS systems, little has been described regarding the benefits and challenges of their use. In this manuscript, the authors address this need by describing potential benefits and challenges of using a system-agnostic CDS service. This analysis is based on the authors' formal assessments of, and practical experiences with, various approaches to developing, implementing, and maintaining CDS capabilities. In particular, the analysis draws on the authors' experience developing and leveraging a system-agnostic CDS Web service known as SEBASTIAN. A primary potential benefit of using a system-agnostic CDS service is the relative ease and flexibility with which the service can be leveraged to implement CDS capabilities across applications and care settings. Other important potential benefits include facilitation of centralized knowledge management and knowledge sharing; the potential to support multiple underlying knowledge representations and knowledge resources through a common service interface; improved simplicity and componentization; easier testing and validation; and the enabling of distributed CDS system development. Conversely, important potential challenges include the increased effort required to develop knowledge resources capable of being used in many contexts and the critical need to standardize the service interface. Despite these challenges, our experiences to date indicate that the benefits of using a system-agnostic CDS service generally outweigh the challenges of using this approach to implementing and maintaining CDS systems.

Keywords: Clinical decision support; SEBASTIAN; Web service; decision support service; service-oriented architecture..

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Sample CDS system architectures using system-agnostic CDS services. Letters and numbers refer to system components and processes referenced in the text.

References

    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.
    1. Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Middleton B, Steen EB, Wright A, Detmer DE. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(2):141–5.
    1. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):765–8.
    1. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Design, implementation, use, and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standards-based Web service for clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:380–4.
    1. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. roadmap for national action on decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:146–55.
    1. Pryor TA, Hripcsak G. The Arden syntax for medical logic modules. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1993;10(4):215–24.
    1. Sordo M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, Greenes RA. Description and status update on GELLO: a proposed standardized object-oriented expression language for clinical decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):164–8.
    1. Boxwala AA, Peleg M, Tu S, et al. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. J Biomed Inform. 2004;37(3):147–61.
    1. Erl T. SOA: principles of service design. Crawfordsville, IN: Prentice Hall; 2008.
    1. Krafzig D, Banke K, Slama D. Enterprise SOA: service-oriented architecture best practices. Indianapolis, IN: Prentice Hall PTR; 2004.
    1. Heffner R, Leaver S, An M. Insights for CIOs: SOA and beyond. Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. First DataBank. First DataBank Drug Information Framework. Available from: [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Cerner Multum. addVantageRx. Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. He H. What is service-oriented architecture? O'Reilly [article on the Internet] Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Lobach DF, Kawamoto K, Anstrom KJ, Russel ML, Woods P, Smith D. Development, deployment and usability of a point-of-care decision support system for chronic disease management using the recently-approved HL7 Decision Support Service standard. Medinfo. 2007:861–5.
    1. Lobach DF, Kawamoto K, Anstrom KJ, et al. Proactive population health management in the context of a regional health information exchange using standards-based decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007:473–7.
    1. Borbolla D, Otero C, Lobach DF, et al. Evaluación de la sensibilidad y especificidad de un sistema de ayuda a la toma de decisiones como modelo de servicio. Infolac 2008. Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina: . 2008.
    1. Health Level 7. HL7 Decision Support Service specification (Draft Standard for Trial Use) Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Object Management Group. OMG Clinical Decision Support Service standard (adopted beta specification) Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Kawamoto K, Honey A, Rubin K. The HL7-OMG Healthcare Services Specification Project: motivation, methodology, and deliverables for enabling a semantically interoperable service-oriented architecture for healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(6):874–81.
    1. Health Level 7. HL7 Context-aware Information Retrieval (Infobutton) standard. Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Hulse NC, Rocha RA, Del Fiol G, Bradshaw RL, Hanna TP, Roemer LK. KAT: a flexible XML-based knowledge authoring environment. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(4):418–30.
    1. Kawamoto K. Integration of knowledge resources into applications to enable clinical decision support: architectural considerations. In: Greenes RA, editor. Clinical Decision Support: the road ahead. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press; 2007. pp. 503–38.
    1. National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System. Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) Available from: [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Available from: [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Health Level 7. HL7 Common Terminology Services 2 Service Functional Model (Draft Standard for Trial Use) Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Health Level 7. HL7 Retrieve, Locate, and Update Service specification (Draft Standard for Trial Use) Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Object Management Group. Retrieve, Locate, and Update Service: specification for joint final OMG submission, version 1.07. Available from: . [cited 2010 Jun 14].
    1. Health Level 7. HL7 Virtual Medical Record (vMR) Project Wiki. Available from: [cited 2010 Jun 14].

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren