Deucravacitinib in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in a Phase 2 Trial

Diamant Thaçi, Bruce Strober, Kenneth B Gordon, Peter Foley, Melinda Gooderham, Akimichi Morita, Kim A Papp, Lluís Puig, M Alan Menter, Matthew J Colombo, Yedid Elbez, Renata M Kisa, June Ye, Andrew A Napoli, Lan Wei, Subhashis Banerjee, Joseph F Merola, Alice B Gottlieb, Diamant Thaçi, Bruce Strober, Kenneth B Gordon, Peter Foley, Melinda Gooderham, Akimichi Morita, Kim A Papp, Lluís Puig, M Alan Menter, Matthew J Colombo, Yedid Elbez, Renata M Kisa, June Ye, Andrew A Napoli, Lan Wei, Subhashis Banerjee, Joseph F Merola, Alice B Gottlieb

Abstract

Introduction: Deucravacitinib is an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor that demonstrated therapeutic benefit in a Phase 2 clinical trial of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This analysis was designed to evaluate the effect of deucravacitinib on additional clinical and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes and assess the relationship between these outcomes in adults with psoriasis.

Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a 12-week Phase 2 trial was conducted for the three most efficacious dosage groups (3 mg twice daily, 6 mg twice daily, 12 mg once daily) and placebo. Investigator assessments for efficacy included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA) involvement, and static Physician's Global Assessment; QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Treatment responses and their associations were evaluated over time.

Results: Deucravacitinib elicited improvement versus placebo as early as Week 4 for most efficacy measures (including changes in absolute PASI and BSA), with efficacy trends observed from Week 2 to Week 12. Improvements in QoL, assessed by achievement of a DLQI overall score of 0/1 (no effect at all on patient's life), followed a pattern similar to deucravacitinib-related clinical outcomes over 12 weeks. Overall, patients with greater improvements in psoriasis-related clinical signs and symptoms also reported greater improvement in QoL. However, complete skin clearance was not required for achieving DLQI 0/1.

Conclusion: Deucravacitinib treatment produced early response and similar trends in improvements across multiple efficacy assessments and QoL in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Deucravacitinib has the potential to become a promising new oral therapy for this condition.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT02931838.

Keywords: Body surface area; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of life; TYK2.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean percentage change from baseline in PASI scores over time for placebo and the deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, and 12 mg QD dosage groups. BID twice daily; PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PBO placebo; QD once daily
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean absolute change from baseline in BSA percentage over time for placebo and the deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, and 12 mg QD dosage groups. BID twice daily; BSA body surface area; PBO placebo; QD once daily
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Response rates at Week 12 for a PASI 90, b PASI 100, c sPGA 0/1, d absolute PASI ≤ 5, e absolute PASI ≤ 3, f absolute PASI ≤ 1, g BSA (≤ 1% and ≤ 3%), and h sPGA × BSA 75 for placebo and the deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, and 12 mg QD dosage groups. BID twice daily; BSA, body surface area; PASI 75 at least 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 90 at least 90% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 100 100% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PBO placebo; QD every day; sPGA × BSA 75 at least 75% improvement from baseline in the product of the static Physician’s Global Assessment and body surface area involvement
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage of patients with a DLQI overall score of 0/1, which reflects no impact on patient’s life, for placebo and the deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, and 12 mg QD dosage groups. BID twice daily; DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index; QD every day; QoL quality of life
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Time course of PASI 75, PASI 90, sPGA 0/1, and DLQI overall score of 0/1 response rates for the combined deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, and 12 mg QD dosage groups. BID twice daily; DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index; PASI 75 at least 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 90 at least 90% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; QD every day; sPGA static Physician’s Global Assessment
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
DLQI 0/1 at Week 12 by absolute PASI (a), PASI response band (b), and BSA response band (c) for the combined patient groups of deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, and 12 mg QD dosage groups. BID twice daily; BSA body surface area; DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index; PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI < 25 < 25% improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 25 to < 50 25% to < 50% improvement; PASI 50 to < 75 50% to < 75% improvement; PASI 75 to < 90 75% to < 90% improvement; PASI 90 to < 100 90% to < 100% improvement; PASI 100 100% improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; QD once daily

References

    1. Spuls PI, Lecluse LL, Poulsen ML, Bos JD, Stern RS, Nijsten T. How good are clinical severity and outcome measures for psoriasis? Quantitative evaluation in a systematic review. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(4):933–943.
    1. Feldman SR, Krueger GG. Psoriasis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii65–ii68.
    1. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, Van Voorhees AS, Leonardi CL, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):826–850.
    1. Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis–oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238–244.
    1. Papp K, Gordon K, Thaçi D, Morita A, Gooderham M, Foley P, et al. Phase 2 trial of selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibition in psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(14):1313–1321.
    1. Armstrong AW, Siegel MP, Bagel J, Boh EE, Buell M, Cooper KD, et al. From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: treatment targets for plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(2):290–298.
    1. Weisman S, Pollack CR, Gottschalk RW. Psoriasis disease severity measures: comparing efficacy of treatments for severe psoriasis. J Dermatol Treat. 2003;14(3):158–165.
    1. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)–a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210–216.
    1. Katugampola RP, Lewis VJ, Finlay AY. The Dermatology Life Quality Index: assessing the efficacy of biological therapies for psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(5):945–950.
    1. Nogueira M, Puig L, Torres T. JAK inhibitors for treatment of psoriasis: focus on selective TYK2 inhibitors. Drugs. 2020;80(4):341–351.
    1. Burke JR, Cheng L, Gillooly KM, Strnad J, Zupa-Fernandez A, Catlett IM, et al. Autoimmune pathways in mice and humans are blocked by pharmacological stabilization of the TYK2 pseudokinase domain. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(502):1–16.
    1. Walsh JA, McFadden M, Woodcock J, Clegg DO, Helliwell P, Dommasch E, et al. Product of the Physician Global Assessment and body surface area: a simple static measure of psoriasis severity in a longitudinal cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):931–937.
    1. Chow C, Simpson MJ, Luger TA, Chubb H, Ellis CN. Comparison of three methods for measuring psoriasis severity in clinical studies (Part 1 of 2): change during therapy in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Static Physician's Global Assessment and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(7):1406–1414.
    1. Simpson MJ, Chow C, Morgenstern H, Luger TA, Ellis CN. Comparison of three methods for measuring psoriasis severity in clinical studies (part 2 of 2): use of quality of life to assess construct validity of the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and static Physician's Global Assessment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(7):1415–1420.
    1. Stein Gold L, Hansen JB, Patel D, Veverka KA, Strober B. PGAxBSA composite versus PASI: comparison across disease severities and as therapeutic response measure for Cal/BD foam in plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):131–138.
    1. Strober B, Gottlieb AB, Thaçi D, Puig L, Colombo MJ, Kundu S, et al. An oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib (BMS-986165), reduced absolute psoriasis area and severity index in a phase 2 trial in psoriasis [poster]. Presented at: the Spring Symposium of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology; 2020.
    1. Hongbo Y, Thomas CL, Harrison MA, Salek MS, Finlay AY. Translating the science of quality of life into practice: what do dermatology life quality index scores mean? J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125(4):659–664.
    1. Treat to target: National Psoriasis Foundation, 2021. . Accessed 13 Jul 2021.
    1. Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Chen R, Levi E, Duffin KC. Assessing clinical response and defining minimal disease activity in plaque psoriasis with the Physician Global Assessment and body surface area (PGA × BSA) composite tool: an analysis of apremilast phase 3 ESTEEM data. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(6):1178–1180.
    1. Gottlieb AB, Germino R, Herrera V, Meng X, Merola JF. Exploration of the product of the 5-point Investigator's Global Assessment and Body Surface Area (IGA × BSA) as a practical minimal disease activity goal in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Dermatology. 2019;235(4):348–354.
    1. Merola JF, Amato DA, See K, Burge R, Mallinckrodt C, Ojeh CK, et al. Evaluation of sPGA × BSA as an outcome measure and treatment target for clinical practice. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(9):1955–1961.
    1. Armstrong AW, Schupp C, Wu J, Bebo B. Quality of life and work productivity impairment among psoriasis patients: findings from the National Psoriasis Foundation survey data 2003–2011. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52935.
    1. Armstrong AW, Villanueva Quintero DG, Echeverría CM, Gu Y, Karunaratne M, Reyes SO. Body region involvement and quality of life in psoriasis: analysis of a randomized controlled trial of adalimumab. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17(6):691–699.
    1. Hrehorow E, Salomon J, Matusiak L, Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Patients with psoriasis feel stigmatized. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92(1):67–72.
    1. Lacour JP, Bewley A, Hammond E, Hansen JB, Horne L, Paul C, et al. Association between patient- and physician-reported outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with biologics in real life (PSO-BIO-REAL) Dermatol Ther. 2020;10(5):1099–1109.
    1. Revicki DA, Willian MK, Menter A, Saurat JH, Harnam N, Kaul M. Relationship between clinical response to therapy and health-related quality of life outcomes in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Dermatology. 2008;216(3):260–270.
    1. Dubertret L, Mrowietz U, Ranki A, van de Kerkhof PC, Chimenti S, Lotti T, et al. European patient perspectives on the impact of psoriasis: the EUROPSO patient membership survey. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155(4):729–736.
    1. Puig L, Dossenbach M, Berggren L, Ljungberg A, Zachariae C. Absolute and relative psoriasis area and severity indices (PASI) for comparison of the efficacy of ixekizumab to etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: an integrated analysis of UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 outcomes. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(11):971–977.
    1. Papp KA, Barber K, Bissonnette R, Bourcier M, Lynde CW, Poulin Y, et al. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis receiving etanercept plus topical therapies: results from REFINE. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(8):1555–1561.
    1. Takeshita J, Callis Duffin K, Shin DB, Krueger GG, Robertson AD, Troxel AB, et al. Patient-reported outcomes for psoriasis patients with clear versus almost clear skin in the clinical setting. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(4):633–641.
    1. Gordon KB, Kimball AB, Chau D, Viswanathan HN, Li J, Revicki DA, et al. Impact of brodalumab treatment on psoriasis symptoms and health-related quality of life: use of a novel patient-reported outcome measure, the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(3):705–715.
    1. Leonardi C, Reich K, Foley P, Torii H, Gerdes S, Guenther L, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 5 years in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: long-term results from the UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 phase-3 randomized controlled trials. Dermatol Ther. 2020;10(3):431–447.
    1. Nakamura M, Lee K, Jeon C, Sekhon S, Afifi L, Yan D, et al. Guselkumab for the treatment of psoriasis: A review of phase III trials. Dermatol Ther. 2017;7(3):281–292.
    1. Poulin Y, Sheth P, Gu Y, Teixeira HD. Health-related quality of life worsens disproportionately to objective signs of psoriasis after withdrawal of adalimumab therapy. Dermatol Ther. 2014;4(1):33–42.
    1. Strand V, Sharp V, Koenig AS, Park G, Shi Y, Wang B, et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis and effects of etanercept treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(7):1143–1150.
    1. Kwan Z, Bong YB, Tan LL, Lim SX, Yong AS, Ch'ng CC, et al. Socioeconomic and sociocultural determinants of psychological distress and quality of life among patients with psoriasis in a selected multi-ethnic Malaysian population. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(2):184–195.
    1. Kaufman BP, Alexis AF. Psoriasis in skin of color: insights into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetics, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis in non-white racial/ethnic groups. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(3):405–423.
    1. Jung S, Lee SM, Suh D, Shin HT, Suh DC. The association of socioeconomic and clinical characteristics with health-related quality of life in patients with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):180.
    1. Martin G, Young M, Aldredge L. Recommendations for initiating systemic therapy in patients with psoriasis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019;12(4):13–26.
    1. Greb JE, Goldminz AM, Elder JT, Lebwohl MG, Gladman DD, Wu JJ, et al. Psoriasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16082.
    1. Helmick CG, Lee-Han H, Hirsch SC, Baird TL, Bartlett CL. Prevalence of psoriasis among adults in the US: 2003–2006 and 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(1):37–45.
    1. Langley RG, Krueger GG, Griffiths CE. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii18–23.
    1. Baker EL, Coleman CI, Reinhart KM, Phung OJ, Kugelman L, Chen W, et al. Effect of biologic agents on non-PASI outcomes in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: systematic review and meta-analyses. Dermatol Ther. 2012;2(1):9.
    1. Armstrong A, Gooderham M, Warren R, Papp K, Strober B, Thaçi D, et al. Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, compared with placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from the POETYK PSO-1 study [abstract]. Presented at: the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; 2021.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren