Validation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score

Manne Andersson, Blanka Kolodziej, Roland E Andersson, Manne Andersson, Blanka Kolodziej, Roland E Andersson

Abstract

Background: Patients with suspicion of appendicitis present with a wide range of severity. Score-based risk stratification can optimise the management of these patients. This prospective study validates the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score in patients with suspicion of appendicitis.

Method: Consecutive patients over the age of five with suspicion of appendicitis presenting at 25 Swedish hospital's emergency departments were prospectively included. The diagnostic properties of the AIR score are estimated.

Results: Some 3878 patients were included, 821 with uncomplicated and 724 with complicated appendicitis, 1986 with non-specific abdominal pain and 347 with other diagnoses. The score performed better in detecting complicated appendicitis (ROC area 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-0.90) versus 0.83 (CI 0.82-0.84) for any appendicitis, p < 0.001), in patients below age 15 years and in patients with >47 h duration of symptoms (ROC area 0.93, CI 0.90-0.95 for complicated and 0.87, CI 0.84-0.90 for any appendicitis in both categories). Complicated appendicitis is unlikely at AIR score <4 points (Negative Predictive Value 99%, CI 98-100%). Appendicitis is likely at AIR score >8 points, especially in young patients (positive predictive value (PPV) 96%, CI 90-100%) and men (PPV 89%, CI 84-93%).

Conclusions: The AIR score has high sensitivity for complicated appendicitis and identifies subgroups with low probability of complicated appendicitis or high probability of appendicitis. The discriminating capacity is high in children and patients with long duration of symptoms. It performs equally well in both sexes. This verifies the AIR score as a valid decision support. Trial registration number https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00971438.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proposed algorithm with risk-stratification based on the AIR-score. Compared to the original the low cutoff point is changed to

Fig. 2

STARD-diagram of the flow of…

Fig. 2

STARD-diagram of the flow of participants in the study

Fig. 2
STARD-diagram of the flow of participants in the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
STARD-diagram of the flow of participants in the study

References

    1. Bhangu A. Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2020;107:73–86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11440.
    1. Andersson RE. RIFT study and management of suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2020;107:e207. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11553.
    1. Van RA, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, et al. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and purpose: methods: results: conclusion. Radiology. 2008;249:97–106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071652.
    1. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:537–546. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011.
    1. Giljaca V, Nadarevic T, Poropat G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2017;41:693–700. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3792-7.
    1. Power SP, Moloney F, Twomey M, et al. Computed tomography and patient risk: facts, perceptions and uncertainties. World J Radiol. 2016;8:902. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902.
    1. Rud B, Vejborg TS, Rappeport ED, et al. Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2.
    1. Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE, et al. Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology. 2011;259:231–239. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100984.
    1. Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008 doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.
    1. Andersson M, Kolodziej B, Andersson RE, STRAPPSCORE Study Group Randomized clinical trial of appendicitis inflammatory response score-based management of patients with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1451–1461. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10637.
    1. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. National Swedish Patient Register No Title. . Accessed 30 Jun 2012
    1. Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:1198–1202. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.
    1. Schuetz CG. Using neuroimaging to predict relapse to smoking: role of possible moderators and mediators. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(Suppl 1):S78–S82. doi: 10.1002/mpr.
    1. Weston AR, Jackson TJ, Blamey S. Diagnosis of appendicitis in adults by ultrasonography or computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:368–379. doi: 10.1017/S0266462305050488.
    1. Jennings R, Guo H, Goldin A, Wright DR. Cost-effectiveness of imaging protocols for suspected appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2020 doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1352.
    1. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:1–42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
    1. Kularatna M, Lauti M, Haran C, Macfater W. Clinical prediction rules for appendicitis in adults: which is best? World J Surg. 2017;41:1769–1781. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3926-6.
    1. Castro SMMD, Ünlü Ç, Steller EP, et al. Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2012;36:1540–1545. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1521-4.
    1. Kollár D, McCartan DP, Bourke M, et al. Predicting acute appendicitis? A comparison of the alvarado score, the appendicitis inflammatory response score and clinical assessment. World J Surg. 2015;39:104–109. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2794-6.
    1. Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppäniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis—a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.
    1. Malyar A, Singh B, Dar H, et al. A comparative study of appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score with Alvarado score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Balk Mil Med Rev. 2015;18:72. doi: 10.5455/bmmr.180876.
    1. Gudelis M, Lacasta Garcia JD, Trujillano Cabello JJ. Diagnosis of pain in the right Iliac Fossa. A new diagnostic score based on decision-tree and artificial neural network methods. Cirugía Española (English Ed) 2019;97:329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2019.06.002.
    1. Karami MY, Niakan H, Zadebagheri N, et al. Which one is better? Comparison of the acute inflammatory response, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and Alvarado scoring systems. Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33:227–231. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.227.
    1. Yeşiltaş M, Karakaş DÖ, Gökçek B, et al. Can alvarado and appendicitis inflammatory response scores evaluate the severity of acute appendicitis? Ulus Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018;24:557–562. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.72318.
    1. Macco S, Vrouenraets BC, de Castro SMM. Evaluation of scoring systems in predicting acute appendicitis in children. Surg (United States) 2016;160:1599–1604. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.023.
    1. Gudjonsdottir J, Marklund E, Hagander L, Salö M. Clinical prediction scores for pediatric appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2020 doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710534.
    1. Scott AJ, Mason SE, arunakirinathan M, et al. risk stratification by the appendicitis inflammatory response score to guide decision-making in patients with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102:563–572. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9773.
    1. Andersson M, Rubér M, Ekerfelt C, et al. Can new inflammatory markers improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis? World J Surg. 2014;38:2777–2783. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2708-7.
    1. Di Saverio S, Sibilio A, Giorgini E, et al. The NOTA study (non operative treatment for acute appendicitis): Prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conser. Ann Surg. 2014;260:109–117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000560.
    1. March B, Leigh L, Brussius-Coelho M, et al. Can CRP velocity in right iliac fossa pain identify patients for intervention? A prospective observational cohort study. Surgeon. 2019;17:284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.08.007.
    1. Andersson RE. The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg. 2007;31:86–92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0056-y.
    1. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;339:157–160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren