Water-Holding and Transport Properties of Skin Stratum Corneum of Infants and Toddlers Are Different from Those of Adults: Studies in Three Geographical Regions and Four Ethnic Groups

Mary Catherine Mack, Melissa R Chu, Neena K Tierney, Eduardo Ruvolo Jr, Georgios N Stamatas, Nikiforos Kollias, Kamlesh Bhagat, Lin Ma, Katharine M Martin, Mary Catherine Mack, Melissa R Chu, Neena K Tierney, Eduardo Ruvolo Jr, Georgios N Stamatas, Nikiforos Kollias, Kamlesh Bhagat, Lin Ma, Katharine M Martin

Abstract

Background/objective: Epidermal structure, function, and composition are different in white infants and adults. We investigated whether ethnicity and location contribute to differences in functional and clinical measurements of skin barrier function during the first years of life and in adults.

Methods: Children (n = 397, ages 3-49 mos) and women (n = 117, mean age 31 yrs) were enrolled at independent centers in Beijing, China (ethnic Chinese), Skillman, New Jersey (white, African American), and Mumbai, India (ethnic South Asian). Water barrier properties of the stratum corneum were assessed using high-frequency conductance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) on the dorsal forearm and upper inner arm. Digital imaging was used to evaluate facial erythema and scaling.

Results: Despite differences in local climate, TEWL was similar in adults. In children, conductance and TEWL decreased monotonically from age 3 months to 4 years. In children from Beijing, TEWL values were higher in both arm locations than in children in Mumbai and Skillman. No significant differences were observed in TEWL or conductance between the white and African American groups.

Conclusion: In general, TEWL and conductance were greater on the upper inner arm than the dorsal forearm. Erythema and scaling were observed most often in subjects from Beijing and most infrequently in subjects from Mumbai. Stratum corneum water barrier properties were different in children and adults. Although there may be differences in these properties between ethnic groups in childhood, TEWL values were similar in adults across the three geographic locations and four ethnicities.

© 2016 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. Pediatric Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL; mean ± standard error of the mean) decreased in children as a function of age at the (A) upper inner arm and (B) dorsal forearm, independent of region or ethnicity. For clarity, the age axis is shown as the log. *p < 0.05 versus adults from the same geographic region and ethnic group. Color of the asterisk indicates appropriate ethnic group comparison. No subjects from Beijing were recruited in the 37‐ to 48‐month age group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Skin conductance (mean ± standard error of the mean) decreased in children as a function of age at the (A) upper inner arm and (B) dorsal forearm, independent of region or ethnicity. For clarity, the age axis is shown as the log. *p < 0.05 versus adults from the same geographic region and ethnic group. Color of the asterisk indicates appropriate ethnic group comparison. No subjects from Beijing were recruited in the 37‐ to 48‐month age group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative facial images of infants and children from (left to right) Beijing, Mumbai, and Skillman (white, African American) under (A) visible light, (B) cross‐polarized visible light, and (C) ultraviolet excitation fluorescence mode. Cross‐polarized images revealed erythema on the faces of white and Beijing infants and adults, but not African Americans or those from Mumbai. Scaling was observed through ultraviolet imaging in infants and adults from Beijing and two infants from Mumbai. Glasses were used for the ultraviolet excitation fluorescence images to protect the eyes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of subjects with (A) erythema and (B) scaling. No subjects from Mumbai exhibited erythema and no subjects from Skillman exhibited scaling. In Mumbai, only 2 of 30 (6.7%) infants ages 3 to 12 months showed evidence of scaling. No subjects from China were recruited in the 37‐ to 48‐month age group. W, white; AA, African American.

References

    1. Nikolovski J, Stamatas GN, Kollias N et al. Barrier function and water‐holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128:1728–1736.
    1. Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Luedtke MA et al. Infant skin microstructure assessed in vivo differs from adult skin in organization and at the cellular level. Pediatr Dermatol 2010;27:125–131.
    1. Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Mack MC et al. Infant skin physiology and development during the first years of life: a review of recent findings based on in vivo studies. Int J Cosmet Sci 2011;33:17–24.
    1. Rawlings AV. Ethnic skin types: are there differences in skin structure and function? Int J Cosmet Sci 2006;28:79–93.
    1. Chiou YB, Blume‐Peytavi U. Stratum corneum maturation. A review of neonatal skin function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2004;17:57–66.
    1. Stamatas GN, Zerweck C, Grove G et al. Documentation of impaired epidermal barrier in mild and moderate diaper dermatitis in vivo using noninvasive methods. Pediatr Dermatol 2011;28:99–107.
    1. Mancini AJ, Kaulback K, Chamlin SL. The socioeconomic impact of atopic dermatitis in the United States: a systematic review. Pediatr Dermatol 2008;25:1–6.
    1. Chu M, Kollias N. Documentation of normal stratum corneum scaling in an average population: features of differences among age, ethnicity and body site. Br J Dermatol 2011;164:497–507.
    1. Egawa M, Tagami H. Comparison of the depth profiles of water and water‐binding substances in the stratum corneum determined in vivo by Raman spectroscopy between the cheek and volar forearm skin: effects of age, seasonal changes and artificial forced hydration. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:251–260.
    1. Machado M, Hadgraft J, Lane ME. Assessment of the variation of skin barrier function with anatomic site, age, gender and ethnicity. Int J Cosmet Sci 2010;32:397–409.
    1. Pratchyapruit W, Kikuchi K, Gritiyarangasan P et al. Functional analyses of the eyelid skin constituting the most soft and smooth area on the face: contribution of its remarkably large superficial corneocytes to effective water‐holding capacity of the stratum corneum. Skin Res Technol 2007;13:169–175.
    1. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function. Arch Dermatol 1995;131:1134–1138.
    1. Wesley NO, Maibach HI. Racial (ethnic) differences in skin properties: the objective data. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4:843–860.
    1. Boireau‐Adamezyk E, Baillet‐Guffroy A, Stamatas GN. Age‐dependent changes in stratum corneum barrier function. Skin Res Technol 2014;20:409–415.
    1. Voegeli R, Rawlings AV, Summers B. Facial skin pigmentation is not related to stratum corneum cohesion, basal transepidermal water loss, barrier integrity and barrier repair. Int J Cosmet Sci 2015;37:241–252.
    1. Tagami H, Kobayashi H, Kikuchi K. A portable device using a closed chamber system for measuring transepidermal water loss: comparison with the conventional method. Skin Res Technol 2002;8:7–12.
    1. Tagami H. Quantitative measurements of water concentration of the stratum corneum in vivo by high‐frequency current. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1994;185:29–33.
    1. Fotoh C, Elkhyat A, Mac S et al. Cutaneous differences between black, African or Caribbean mixed‐race and Caucasian women: biometrological approach of the hydrolipidic film. Skin Res Technol 2008;14:327–335.
    1. Grimes P, Edison BL, Green BA et al. Evaluation of inherent differences between African American and white skin surface properties using subjective and objective measures. Cutis 2004;73:392–396.
    1. Jungersted JM, Høgh JK, Hellgren LI et al. Ethnicity and stratum corneum ceramides. Br J Dermatol 2010;163:1169–1173.
    1. Muizzuddin N, Hellemans L, Van Overloop L et al. Structural and functional differences in barrier properties of African American, Caucasian and East Asian skin. J Dermatol Sci 2010;59:123–128.
    1. Yosipovitch G, Goon ATJ, Chan YH et al. Are there any differences in skin barrier function, integrity and skin blood llow between different subpopulations of Asians and Caucasians? Exog Dermatol 2002;1:302–306.
    1. Plewig G. Regional differences of cell sizes in the human stratum corneum. II. Effects of sex and age. J Invest Dermatol 1970;54:19–23.
    1. van Logtestijn MD, Dominguez‐Huttinger E, Stamatas GN et al. Resistance to water diffusion in the stratum corneum is depth‐dependent. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117292.
    1. Kelleher M, Dunn‐Galvin A, Hourihane JO et al. Skin barrier dysfunction measured by transepidermal water loss at 2 days and 2 months predates and predicts atopic dermatitis at 1 year. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;135:930–935.e931.
    1. Katagiri C, Sato J, Nomura J et al. Changes in environmental humidity affect the water‐holding property of the stratum corneum and its free amino acid content, and the expression of filaggrin in the epidermis of hairless mice. J Dermatol Sci 2003;31:29–35.
    1. Sato J, Katagiri C, Nomura J et al. Drastic decrease in environmental humidity decreases water‐holding capacity and free amino acid content of the stratum corneum. Arch Dermatol Res 2001;293:477–480.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren