Randomized trial of radiofrequency ablation versus conventional surgery for superficial venous insufficiency: if you don't tell, they won't know

Cynthia de Almeida Mendes, Alexandre de Arruda Martins, Juliana Maria Fukuda, José Ben-Hur Ferraz Parente, Marco Antonio Soares Munia, Alexandre Fioranelli, Marcelo Passos Teivelis, Andrea Yasbek Monteiro Varella, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Sergio Kuzniec, Nelson Wolosker, Cynthia de Almeida Mendes, Alexandre de Arruda Martins, Juliana Maria Fukuda, José Ben-Hur Ferraz Parente, Marco Antonio Soares Munia, Alexandre Fioranelli, Marcelo Passos Teivelis, Andrea Yasbek Monteiro Varella, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Sergio Kuzniec, Nelson Wolosker

Abstract

Objectives:: This study compared radiofrequency ablation versus conventional surgery in patients who had not undergone previous treatment for bilateral great saphenous vein insufficiency, with each patient serving as his own control.

Method:: This was a randomized controlled trial that included 18 patients and was carried out between November 2013 and May 2015. Each of the lower limbs of each patient was randomly assigned to undergo either radiofrequency ablation or conventional surgery. Clinical features (hyperpigmentation, hematoma, aesthetics, pain, skin burn, nerve injury, and thrombophlebitis) were evaluated at one week, one month, and six months postoperatively. Hemodynamic assessments (presence of resection or occlusion of the great saphenous vein and recurrent reflux in the sapheno-femoral junction and in the great saphenous vein) were performed at one month, six months, and 12 months postoperatively. The independent observer (a physician not involved in the original operation), patient, and duplex ultrasonographer were not made aware of the treatment done in each case. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02588911.

Results:: Among the clinical variables analyzed, only the aesthetic evaluation by the physicians was significant, with radiofrequency ablation being considered better than conventional surgery (average, 0.91 points higher: standard deviation: 0.31; 95% confidence interval: -1.51, -0.30; p=0.003). However, in our study, we observed primary success rates of 80% for radiofrequency ablation and 100% for conventional surgery.

Conclusions:: If the physician is not required to inform the patient as to the technique being performed, the patient will not be able to identify the technique based on the signs and symptoms. Our study revealed that both techniques led to high levels of patient satisfaction, but our results favor the choice of conventional surgery over radiofrequency ablation, as patients who underwent conventional surgery had better hemodynamic assessments.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

References

    1. Wittens C, Davies AH, Bækgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S, et al. Editor's Choice - Management of Chronic Venous Disease: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49((6)):678–737. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.02.007.
    1. Campbell B. New evidence on treatments for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2014;101((9)):1037–9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9612.
    1. Ruckley CV, Evans CJ, Allan PL, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG. Chronic venous insufficiency: clinical and duplex correlations. The Edinburgh Vein Study of venous disorders in the general population. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36((3)):520–5. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.126547.
    1. Carroll C, Hummel S, Leaviss J, Ren S, Stevens JW, Everson-Hock E, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17((48)):i–xvi. doi: 10.3310/hta17480. 1–141.
    1. Perkins JM. Standard varicose vein surgery. Phlebology. 2009;24(Suppl 1):34–41. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2009.09s004.
    1. Gohel MS, Davies AH. Radiofrequency ablation for uncomplicated varicose veins. Phlebology. 2009;24(Suppl 1):42–9. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2009.09s005.
    1. Darwood RJ, Gough MJ. Endovenous laser treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins. Phlebology. 2009;24(Suppl 1):50–61. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2009.09s006.
    1. Coleridge Smith P. Foam and liquid sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Phlebology. 2009;24(Suppl 1):62–72. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2009.09s007.
    1. Eidson JL, Atkins MD, Bohannon WT, Marrocco CJ, Buckley CJ, Bush RL. Economic and outcomes-based analysis of the care of symptomatic varicose veins. J Surg Res. 2011;168((1)):5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.12.027.
    1. Gohel MS, Epstein DM, Davies AH. Cost-effectiveness of traditional and endovenous treatments for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2010;97((12)):1815–23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7256.
    1. Sarin S, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Assessment of stripping the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1992;79((9)):889–93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790911.
    1. Dwerryhouse S, Davies B, Harradine K, Earnshaw JJ. Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29((4)):589–92. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70302-2.
    1. Christenson JT, Gueddi S, Gemayel G, Bounameaux H. Prospective randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and surgery for treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins with a 2-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52((5)):1234–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.104.
    1. Perälä J, Rautio T, Biancari F, Ohtonen P, Wiik H, Heikkinen T, et al. Radiofrequency endovenous obliteration versus stripping of the long saphenous vein in the management of primary varicose veins: 3-year outcome of a randomized study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19((5)):669–72. doi: 10.1007/s10016-005-6613-2.
    1. Siribumrungwong B, Noorit P, Wilasrusmee C, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous ablation and surgical intervention in patients with varicose vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44((2)):214–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.017.
    1. Hinchliffe RJ, Ubhi J, Beech A, Ellison J, Braithwaite BD. A prospective randomised controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31((2)):212–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.07.005.
    1. Helmy ElKaffas K, ElKashef O, ElBaz W. Great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation versus standard stripping in the management of primary varicose veins-a randomized clinical trial. Angiology. 2011;62((1)):49–54. doi: 10.1177/0003319710380680.
    1. Subramonia S, Lees T. Radiofrequency ablation vs conventional surgery for varicose veins - a comparison of treatment costs in a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39((1)):104–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.09.012.
    1. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, Kistner RL, Pichot O, et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study) J Vasc Surg. 2003;38((2)):207–14. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00228-3.
    1. Pichot O, Kabnick LS, Creton D, Merchant RF, Schuller-Petroviae S, Chandler JG. Duplex ultrasound scan findings two years after great saphenous vein radiofrequency endovenous obliteration. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39((1)):189–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.07.015.
    1. Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D, Cooke S, Earnshaw JJ. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12((4)):442–5. doi: 10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80011-6.
    1. Nyamekye I, Shephard NA, Davies B, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. Clinicopathological evidence that neovascularisation is a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15((5)):412–5. doi: 10.1016/S1078-5884(98)80202-5.
    1. Winterborn RJ, Foy C, Earnshaw JJ. Causes of varicose vein recurrence: late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40((4)):634–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.003.
    1. Egan B, Donnelly M, Bresnihan M, Tierney S, Feeley M. Neovascularization: an “innocent bystander” in recurrent varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44((6)):1279–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.017.
    1. Joshi D, Sinclair A, Tsui J, Sarin S. Incomplete removal of great saphenous vein is the most common cause for recurrent varicose veins. Angiology. 2011;62((2)):198–201. doi: 10.1177/0003319710375090.
    1. Kostas TT, Ioannou CV, Veligrantakis M, Pagonidis C, Katsamouris AN. The appropriate length of great saphenous vein stripping should be based on the extent of reflux and not on the intent to avoid saphenous nerve injury. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46((6)):1234–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.055.
    1. de Medeiros CA. Comparison of endovenous laser therapy vs. conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein: midterm results. J Vasc Bras. 2006;5((4)):277–87. doi: 10.1590/S1677-54492006000400007.
    1. Goode SD, Chowdhury A, Crockett M, Beech A, Simpson R, Richards T, et al. Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm) Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40((2)):246–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.026.
    1. Merchant RF, Pichot O, Closure Study Group Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42((3)):502–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.007.
    1. Merchant RF, DePalma RG, Kabnick LS. Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35((6)):1190–6. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.124231.
    1. Weiss RA, Weiss MA. Controlled radiofrequency endovenous occlusion using a unique radiofrequency catheter under duplex guidance to eliminate saphenous varicose vein reflux: a 2-year follow-up. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28((1)):38–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01188.x.
    1. Morrison C, Dalsing MC. Signs and symptoms of saphenous nerve injury after greater saphenous vein stripping: prevalence, severity, and relevance for modern practice. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38((5)):886–90. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00790-0.
    1. Miller FG. Sham surgery: an ethical analysis. Sci Eng Ethics. 2004;10((1)):157–66. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0073-x.
    1. Wolf BR, Buckwalter JA. Randomized surgical trials and “sham” surgery: relevance to modern orthopaedics and minimally invasive surgery. Iowa Orthop J. 2006;26:107–11.
    1. Welch HJ. Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44((3)):601–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.003.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren